Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials

Bound state attraction threshold in the layered Hubbard model

M. Bąk

Published Jan 21, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.171756

Related papers

Two-Particle Bound States in the Layered Hubbard Model

M. Bąk

•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Increasing superconducting T c by layering in the attractive Hubbard model

Rodrigo A. Fontenele, Natanael C. Costa, Thereza Paiva +1 more

The attractive Hubbard model has become a model readily realizable with ultracold atoms on optical lattices. However, the superconducting (superfluid) critical temperatures ${T}_{c}$'s are still somewhat smaller than the lowest temperatures achieved in experiments. Here, we consider two possible routes, generically called layering, to increase ${T}_{c}$: a bilayer and a simple cubic lattice, both with tunable hopping ${t}_{z}$ between attractive Hubbard planes. We have performed minus-sign--free determinant quantum Monte Carlo simulations to calculate response functions such as pairing correlation functions, uniform spin susceptibility, and double occupancy, through which we map out some physical properties. We have found that by a judicious choice of fillings and intensity of on-site attraction, a bilayer can exhibit ${T}_{c}$'s between 1.5 and 1.7 times those of the single layer; for the simple-cubic lattice the enhancement can be 30% larger than the maximum for the single layer. We also check the accuracy of both a BCS-like estimate for ${T}_{c}$ in the attractive Hubbard model as well as of an upper bound for ${T}_{c}$ based on the superfluid density.

arXiv:2408.17405•Physical Review A•Nov 18, 2024•5 citations

Scattering resonances and two-particle bound states of the extended Hubbard model

Manuel Valiente, David Petrosyan

We present a complete derivation of two-particle states of the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model involving attractive or repulsive on-site and nearest-neighbour interactions. We find that this system possesses scattering resonances and two families of energy-dependent interaction-bound states which are not present in the Hubbard model with the on-site interaction alone.

arXiv:0903.4574•Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Jun 1, 2009•73 citations

Resonance state in the 2D attractive Hubbard model

Bumsoo Kyung

Physica B Condensed Matter•Oct 1, 1999•0 citations

Superfluid stiffness renormalization and critical temperature enhancement in a composite superconductor

Gideon Wachtel, Assaf Bar-Yaacov, Dror Orgad

We study a model of a composite system constructed from a ``pairing layer'' of disconnected attractive-$U$ Hubbard sites that is coupled by single-particle tunneling, ${t}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}$, to a disordered metallic layer. For small interlayer tunneling the system is described by an effective long-range $XY$ phase model whose critical temperature, ${T}_{c}$, is essentially insensitive to the disorder and is exponentially suppressed by quantum fluctuations. ${T}_{c}$ reaches a maximum for intermediate values of ${t}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}$, which we calculate using a combination of mean-field, classical, and quantum Monte Carlo methods. The maximal ${T}_{c}$ scales as a fraction of the zero-temperature gap of the attractive sites when $U$ is smaller than the metallic bandwidth, and is bounded by the maximal ${T}_{c}$ of the two-dimensional attractive Hubbard model for large $U$. Our results indicate that a thin, rather than a thick, metallic coating is better suited for the enhancement of ${T}_{c}$ at the surface of a phase fluctuating superconductor.

arXiv:1205.4737•Physical Review B•Oct 31, 2012•14 citations

Attractive Hubbard model in the strong-coupling regime

T. Schneider, H. Beck, Dierk Bormann +3 more

Physica C Superconductivity•Nov 1, 1993•15 citations
The attractive Hubbard model has become a model readily realizable with ultracold atoms on optical lattices. However, the superconducting (superfluid) critical temperatures Tc{T}_{c}Tc​'s are still somewhat smaller than the lowest temperatures achieved in experiments. Here, we consider two possible routes, generically called layering, to increase Tc{T}_{c}Tc​: a bilayer and a simple cubic lattice, both with tunable hopping tz{t}_{z}tz​ between attractive Hubbard planes. We have performed minus-sign--free determinant quantum Monte Carlo simulations to calculate response functions such as pairing correlation functions, uniform spin susceptibility, and double occupancy, through which we map out some physical properties. We have found that by a judicious choice of fillings and intensity of on-site attraction, a bilayer can exhibit Tc{T}_{c}Tc​'s between 1.5 and 1.7 times those of the single layer; for the simple-cubic lattice the enhancement can be 30% larger than the maximum for the single layer. We also check the accuracy of both a BCS-like estimate for Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ in the attractive Hubbard model as well as of an upper bound for Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ based on the superfluid density.
We study a model of a composite system constructed from a ``pairing layer'' of disconnected attractive-UUU Hubbard sites that is coupled by single-particle tunneling, ${t}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}$, to a disordered metallic layer. For small interlayer tunneling the system is described by an effective long-range XYXYXY phase model whose critical temperature, Tc{T}_{c}Tc​, is essentially insensitive to the disorder and is exponentially suppressed by quantum fluctuations. Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ reaches a maximum for intermediate values of ${t}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}$, which we calculate using a combination of mean-field, classical, and quantum Monte Carlo methods. The maximal Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ scales as a fraction of the zero-temperature gap of the attractive sites when UUU is smaller than the metallic bandwidth, and is bounded by the maximal Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ of the two-dimensional attractive Hubbard model for large UUU. Our results indicate that a thin, rather than a thick, metallic coating is better suited for the enhancement of Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ at the surface of a phase fluctuating superconductor.