Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica C Superconductivity

Attractive Hubbard model in the strong-coupling regime

T. Schneider, H. Beck, Dierk Bormann, Thomas Meintrup, Sandra Schafroth, Alex A. Schmidt

Published Nov 1, 1993• 15 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0921-4534(93)90085-5

Related papers

Strong Coupling Regime in the Hubbard Model at Low Densities

Alberto Parola, Sandro Sorella, Michele Parrinello +1 more

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

Strong coupling regime in the two-dimensional Hubbard model

Ian P. McCulloch, M. Gulácsi

Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials•May 1, 1998•0 citations

16pBA-8 Hidden fermionic excitation present in the strong-coupling regime of the attractive Hubbard model

志朗 酒井, Marcello Civelli, Yusuke Nomura +1 more

日本物理学会講演概要集•Sep 16, 2015•0 citations

From sudden quench to adiabatic dynamics in the attractive Hubbard model

Giacomo Mazza

We study the crossover between the sudden quench limit and the adiabatic dynamics of superconducting states in the attractive Hubbard model. We focus on the dynamics induced by the change of the attractive interaction during a finite ramp time. The ramp time is varied in order to track the evolution of the dynamical phase diagram from the sudden quench to the equilibrium limit. Two different dynamical regimes are realized for quenches towards weak and strong coupling interactions. At weak coupling the dynamics depends only on the energy injected into the system, whereas a dynamics retaining memory of the initial state takes place at strong coupling. We show that this is related to a sharp transition between a weak and a strong coupling quench dynamical regime, which defines the boundaries beyond which a dynamics independent from the initial state is recovered. Comparing the dynamics in the superconducting and nonsuperconducting phases, we argue that this is due to the lack of an adiabatic connection to the equilibrium ground state for nonequilibrium superconducting states in the strong coupling quench regime.

arXiv:1708.01096•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Nov 7, 2017•24 citations

Correlated pairs in the attractive Hubbard model

Philip A. Pincus, Paul M. Chaikin, Cornelius F. Coll

Solid State Communications•Jun 1, 1973•49 citations

Superconductivity in the extended two-dimensional Hubbard model: Strong-coupling regime and hybridization effects

E.S. Caixeiro, A. Troper

In this work we have considered a two-dimensional two-band Hubbard model (extended Hubbard model) to study the effect of the nonlocal hybridization ${V}_{\mathbf{k}}$ on the superconductivity. In the strong-coupling regime and for a $d$-wave superconducting gap, we have obtained the superconducting critical temperature ${T}_{c}$ and the zero-temperature superconducting gap ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{0}$ for different hybridizations. We have adopted hopping parameters suitable to describe the high-temperature superconductor materials. The results show that for a fixed value of the hybridization and the intraband $d\text{\ensuremath{-}}d$ attractive potential $U$, the gap increases for low temperatures and diminishes as the temperatures increase toward ${T}_{c}$. As the hybridization increases both, ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{0}$ and ${T}_{c}$, diminish. For each hybridization, the quantity $2{\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{0}/{k}_{B}{T}_{c}$ increases and saturates in a particular value as $U$ increases. The relation between applied pressure $P$ and hybridization in the strong-coupling regime is also discussed.

Physical Review B•Jul 1, 2010•8 citations
We study the crossover between the sudden quench limit and the adiabatic dynamics of superconducting states in the attractive Hubbard model. We focus on the dynamics induced by the change of the attractive interaction during a finite ramp time. The ramp time is varied in order to track the evolution of the dynamical phase diagram from the sudden quench to the equilibrium limit. Two different dynamical regimes are realized for quenches towards weak and strong coupling interactions. At weak coupling the dynamics depends only on the energy injected into the system, whereas a dynamics retaining memory of the initial state takes place at strong coupling. We show that this is related to a sharp transition between a weak and a strong coupling quench dynamical regime, which defines the boundaries beyond which a dynamics independent from the initial state is recovered. Comparing the dynamics in the superconducting and nonsuperconducting phases, we argue that this is due to the lack of an adiabatic connection to the equilibrium ground state for nonequilibrium superconducting states in the strong coupling quench regime.
In this work we have considered a two-dimensional two-band Hubbard model (extended Hubbard model) to study the effect of the nonlocal hybridization Vk{V}_{\mathbf{k}}Vk​ on the superconductivity. In the strong-coupling regime and for a ddd-wave superconducting gap, we have obtained the superconducting critical temperature Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ and the zero-temperature superconducting gap ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{0}$ for different hybridizations. We have adopted hopping parameters suitable to describe the high-temperature superconductor materials. The results show that for a fixed value of the hybridization and the intraband $d\text{\ensuremath{-}}d$ attractive potential UUU, the gap increases for low temperatures and diminishes as the temperatures increase toward Tc{T}_{c}Tc​. As the hybridization increases both, ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{0}$ and Tc{T}_{c}Tc​, diminish. For each hybridization, the quantity $2{\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{0}/{k}_{B}{T}_{c}$ increases and saturates in a particular value as UUU increases. The relation between applied pressure PPP and hybridization in the strong-coupling regime is also discussed.