Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics states that the wave function is not a real object, opposed to Schrödinger's electron cloud idea.Roger Boudet's theory shown that it is possible to represent electromagnetic radiation from a single electronic transition via the classical electromagnetism and the quantum transition currents between states, based on single electron (Schrödinger) wave function.This mathematically consistent theory can be seen as a potential concurrent to QED with accurate results for spontaneous emission coefficient but above all: it describes the photon electromagnetic field as we can observe it in laboratory.We want to extend this idea to multi-electronic system using 3D wave functions to describe electrons in atoms.The variational principle and the electron cloud model, we will show that we can represent quantum mechanics in real space using the Hartree equation, in a first approximation.We will provide an application for the determination of the ground state of the first five atoms.
Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics states that the wave function is not a real object, opposed to Schrödinger's electron cloud idea.Roger Boudet's theory shown that it is possible to represent electromagnetic radiation from a single electronic transition via the classical electromagnetism and the quantum transition currents between states, based on single electron (Schrödinger) wave function.This mathematically consistent theory can be seen as a potential concurrent to QED with accurate results for spontaneous emission coefficient but above all: it describes the photon electromagnetic field as we can observe it in laboratory.We want to extend this idea to multi-electronic system using 3D wave functions to describe electrons in atoms.The variational principle and the electron cloud model, we will show that we can represent quantum mechanics in real space using the Hartree equation, in a first approximation.We will provide an application for the determination of the ground state of the first five atoms.
Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics states that the wave function is not a real object, opposed to Schrödinger's electron cloud idea.Roger Boudet's theory shown that it is possible to represent electromagnetic radiation from a single electronic transition via the classical electromagnetism and the quantum transition currents between states, based on single electron (Schrödinger) wave function.This mathematically consistent theory can be seen as a potential concurrent to QED with accurate results for spontaneous emission coefficient or Lamb shifts but above all: it describes the photon electromagnetic field as we can observe it in laboratory.We want to extend this idea to multi-electronic system using 3D wave functions to describe electrons in atoms.Using the method of Frank Rioux based on variational principle and the electron cloud model, we will show that we can find equivalent result to Hartree-Fock theory, at least for the five first atoms, and in a much simpler way.
Quantum mechanics describes multi-electronic system by using non-relativistic probabilistic theories (non-relativistic many-body Hamiltonian, Bethe-Salpeter equation, Breit equation, density functional theory and so on).All of these theories are approximations and provide a probabilistic conception of quantum mechanics, which prevents it to be compatible with general relativity (or "macro scale" physics).Indeed, the real observable world (or Minkowski space) is for us a 3D+time space but quantum mechanics is expressed in multi-dimensional Hilbert space, which is not physical but purely mathematical.In this article we try to make a relativistic equation that gives a correct description of atomic physics in the real three-dimensional space for N ≥ 2 electrons systems: i.e a N-electrons Dirac equation.The starting point is to use the wave mechanics concept of De Broglie and Schrödinger: considering the electron as a mini oscillating cloud or matter-wave.For this we start from the Hartree equation, which gives already a 3D space description of each electron wave function.Then we jump into Hartree-Fock theory, that takes into account the electron exchange and can be also expressed in 3D, thanks to Slater-Condon rules.By extending the concept of exchange potential to a relativistic 4-exchange potential, and doing the same for the electron-electron repulsion potential, we have obtained a relativistic N electrons Dirac equation, in 3D+time space, including new relativistic interactions.The non-relativistic equivalence to Hartree-Fock equations will be demonstrated, which shows that the equation is already correct to describe light atoms.
Quantum mechanics describes multi-electronic systems by using probabilistic theories (non-relativistic many-body Hamiltonian, Bethe-Salpeter equation, Breit equation, density functional theory and so on).All of these theories are approximations and provide a probabilistic conception of quantum mechanics, which prevents it to be compatible with general relativity (or "macro scale" physics).Indeed, the real observable world (or Minkowski space) is for us a 3D+time space but quantum mechanics is expressed in multi-dimensional Hilbert space, which is not physical but purely mathematical.In this article we try to make a relativistic equation that gives a correct description of atomic physics in the real space for N ≥ 2 electrons systems: i.e a N-electrons Dirac equation.The starting point is to use the wave mechanics concept of De Broglie and Schrödinger: considering the electron as a matter-wave.For this we start from the Hartree equation, which gives already a 3D space description of each electron wave function.Then we jump into Hartree-Fock theory, that takes into account the electron exchange and can be also expressed in 3D, thanks to Slater-Condon rules.By extending the concept of exchange potential to a relativistic 4-exchange potential, and doing the same for the electron-electron repulsion, kinetic and rest mass energy: we obtain a relativistic N electrons Dirac equation, in 3D+time space that takes into account relativistic and correlation effects.The non-relativistic, stationary, uncorrelated and scalar approximation will show the reduction of the N-electrons Dirac equation into Hartree-Fock equation.
Abstract Quantum mechanics describes multi-electronic systems by using probabilistic theories. All of these theories provide a probabilistic conception of quantum mechanics, with an astonishing accuracy (for instance the Helium atom ground state is computed with more than 20 digits of accuracy) but unfortunately seems to be a bit “disconnected” with macro-scale physics. Indeed, the real observable world is for us a 3D+time Minkowski space but quantum mechanics is expressed in multi-dimensional Hilbert space: which is not intuitively physical but seems to be purely mathematical. In this article we try to construct a relativistic equation that gives an approximately correct description of atomic physics in the spacetime (i.e the “real space”) for 2 electrons systems: i.e a 2-electrons Dirac equation. The starting point is to use the wave mechanics concept of De Broglie and Schrödinger: considering the electron as a matter-wave. For this we start from the Hartree equation, which gives already a spacetime description of each electron wave function. Then, we switch to Hartree-Fock representation, which gives birth to the exchange potential, that can be also expressed in spacetime. By extending the concept of exchange potential to the relativistic 4-exchange: we obtain a relativistic 2-electrons spacetime Dirac-Hartree-Fock (STDHF) equation (i.e in Minkowski space). That equation takes into account relativistic effects but not correlation effects, which is the difficulty of this study. Then we will show the equivalence of the 2-electrons STDHF equation with the Hartree-Fock equation in non-relativistic, stationary and scalar regime. Electron correlation issues will be discussed as well.
Quantum mechanics is a theory to explain and predict the behavior of particles such as electrons, protons, neutrons, atomic nuclei, atoms, and molecules, as well as the photon–the particle associated with electromagnetic radiation or light. From quantum theory we obtain the laws of chemistry as well as explanations for the properties of materials, such as crystals, semiconductors, superconductors, and superfluids. Applications of quantum behavior give us transistors, computer chips, lasers, and masers. The relatively new field of molecular biology, which leads to our better understanding of biological structures and life processes, derives from quantum considerations. Thus, quantum behavior encompasses a large fraction of modern science and technology. Quantum theory was developed during the first half of the twentieth century through the efforts of many scientists. In 1926, E. Schrödinger interjected wave mechanics into the array of ideas, equations, explanations, and theories that were prevalent at the time to explain the growing accumulation of observations of quantum phenomena. His theory introduced the wave function and the differential wave equation that it obeys. Schrödinger's wave mechanics is now the backbone of our current conceptional understanding and our mathematical procedures for the study of quantum phenomena. Our presentation of the basic principles of quantum mechanics is contained in the first three chapters. Chapter 1 begins with a treatment of plane waves and wave packets, which serves as background material for the subsequent discussion of the wave function for a free particle.
Quantum mechanics (QM) and quantum electrodynamics (QED) are often touted as the most successful theories ever. In this paper, this claim is critically evaluated by a test of internal consistency for the ability to calculate the conjugate observables of the nature of the free electron, ionization energy, elastic electron scattering, and the excited states of the helium atom using the same solution for each of the separate experimental measurements. It is found that in some cases quantum gives good numbers, but the solutions are meaningless numbers since each has no relationship to providing an accurate physical model. Rather, the goal is to mathematically reproduce an experimental or prior theoretical number using adjustable parameters including arbitrary wave functions in computer algorithms with precision that is often much greater (e.g. 8 significant figures greater) than possible based on the propagation of errors in the measured fundamental constants implicit in the physical problem. Given the constraints of adherence to physical laws and internal consistency, an extensive literature search indicates that quantum mechanics has never solved a single physical problem correctly including the hydrogen atom and the next member of the periodic chart, the helium atom. Rather than using postulated unverifiable theories that treat atomic particles as if they were not real, physical laws are now applied to the same problem. In an attempt to provide some physical insight into atomic problems and starting with the same essential physics as Bohr of − e moving in the Coulombic field of the proton and the wave equation as modified after Schrodinger, a classical approach is explored which yields a model which is remarkably accurate and provides insight into physics on the atomic level. The proverbial view deeply seated in the wave-particle duality notion that there is no large-scale physical counterpart to the nature of the electron is shown not to be correct. Physical laws and intuition may be restored when dealing with the wave equation and quantum atomic problems. Specifically, a theory of classical quantum mechanics (CQM) was derived from first principles as reported previously [1-7] that successfully applied physical laws to the solution of atomic problems that has its basis in a breakthrough in the understanding of the stability of the bound electron to radiation. Rather than using the postulated Schrodinger boundary condition: “ 0 Ψ→ as →∞ r ,” which leads to a purely mathematical model of the electron, the constraint is based on experimental observation. Using Maxwell’s equations, the classical wave equation is solved with the constraint that the bound 1 = n -state electron cannot radiate energy. Although it is well known that an accelerated point particle radiates, an extended distribution, modeled as a superposition of accelerating charges, does not have to radiate. A simple invariant physical model arises naturally wherein the predicted results are extremely straightforward and internally consistent requiring minimal math as in the case of the most famous equations of Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, de Broglie, and Planck on which the model is based. No new physics is needed; only the known physical laws based on direct observation are used. The accurate solution of the helium atom is confirmed by the agreement of predicted and observed conjugate parameters using the same unique physical model in all cases.