Quantum algorithms for topological data analysis (TDA) seem to provide an exponential advantage over the best classical approach while remaining immune to dequantization procedures and the data-loading problem.In this paper, we give complexity-theoretic evidence that the central task of TDA-estimating Betti numbers-is intractable even for quantum computers.Specifically, we prove that the problem of computing Betti numbers exactly is #P-hard, while the problem of approximating Betti numbers up to multiplicative error is NP-hard.Moreover, both problems retain their hardness if restricted to the regime where quantum algorithms for TDA perform best.Because quantum computers are not expected to solve #P-hard or NP-hard problems in subexponential time, our results imply that quantum algorithms for TDA offer only a polynomial advantage in the worst case.We support our claim by showing that the seminal quantum algorithm for TDA developed by Lloyd, Garnerone, and Zanardi achieves a quadratic speedup over the best-known classical approach in asymptotically almost all cases.Finally, we argue that an exponential quantum advantage can be recovered if the input data is given as a specification of simplices rather than as a list of vertices and edges.
Quantum algorithms for topological data analysis (TDA) seem to provide an exponential advantage over the best classical approach while remaining immune to dequantization procedures and the data-loading problem. In this paper, we give complexity-theoretic evidence that the central task of TDA -- estimating Betti numbers -- is intractable even for quantum computers. Specifically, we prove that the problem of computing Betti numbers exactly is #P-hard, while the problem of approximating Betti numbers up to multiplicative error is NP-hard. Moreover, both problems retain their hardness if restricted to the regime where quantum algorithms for TDA perform best. Because quantum computers are not expected to solve #P-hard or NP-hard problems in subexponential time, our results imply that quantum algorithms for TDA offer only a polynomial advantage in the worst case. We support our claim by showing that the seminal quantum algorithm for TDA developed by Lloyd, Garnerone and Zanardi achieves a quadratic speedup over the best known classical approach in asymptotically almost all cases. Finally, we argue that an exponential quantum advantage can be recovered if the input data is given as a specification of simplices rather than as a list of vertices and edges.
Prior work has explored quantum algorithms for topological data analysis (TDA), revealing the possibility of exponential quantum speedups in estimating the ratios of Betti numbers to the dimension of the combinatorial Laplacian. However, this quantity is only non-vanishing and efficient-to-quantumly-estimate when Betti numbers are exponentially large, a case for which concrete examples are rarely known. Furthermore, certain randomized classical algorithms are sometimes efficient in this regime. Thus, the prospect of achieving quantum advantage in conventional TDA appears fairly narrow. Here, we address these challenges to the quantum advantage in TDA by developing quantum algorithms for Mayer homology, which generalize simplicial homology to
N-nilpotent boundary operators (
∂N=0) and have recently been successfully applied to real-world TDA contexts. We introduce an efficient quantum algorithm for estimating Mayer Betti numbers and their persistent counterparts. We then prove that for high-order simplices, Mayer Betti numbers are often exponentially large in the dense regime, which ameliorates the normalization bottleneck of conventional quantum TDA. In the same regime, we argue that existing dequantization algorithms developed for conventional TDA, when applied to Mayer homology, generally lose theoretical guaranties, facing certain structural barriers that prevent their practical utilities. We also provide logical resource estimates revealing that a quantum computer with roughly a few hundred qubits and sixty million Toffoli gates could solve Mayer homology problems beyond the capabilities of known classical approaches. Finally, we discuss real-world applications of Mayer homology in genomics, supersymmetry, drug discovery, and neuroscience, revealing the potential of our quantum algorithm to deliver real-world impacts via Mayer homology.
Lloyd [Nat. Commun. , 10138 (2016)] were first to demonstrate the promise of quantum algorithms for computing Betti numbers, a way to characterize topological features of data sets. Here, we propose, analyze, and optimize an improved quantum algorithm for topological data analysis (TDA) with reduced scaling, including a method for preparing Dicke states based on inequality testing, a more efficient amplitude estimation algorithm using Kaiser windows, and an optimal implementation of eigenvalue projectors based on Chebyshev polynomials. We compile our approach to a fault-tolerant gate set and estimate constant factors in the Toffoli complexity. Our analysis reveals that superquadratic quantum speedups are only possible for this problem when targeting a multiplicative error approximation and the Betti number grows asymptotically. Further, we propose a dequantization of the quantum TDA algorithm that shows that having exponentially large dimension and Betti number are necessary, but insufficient conditions, for superpolynomial advantage. We then introduce and analyze specific problem examples which have parameters in the regime where superpolynomial advantages may be achieved, and argue that quantum circuits with tens of billions of Toffoli gates can solve seemingly classically intractable instances. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Recent advances have revealed an interplay between quantum computing and topological data analysis (TDA). Most quantum TDA has focused on Betti numbers, which characterize the connectivity and ``holes'' of a dataset. Homology, however, contains additional information in the form of torsion: a nontrivial cycle can become trivial after being repeated finitely, revealing global constraints on how cycles combine and wrap around one another. Beyond applications in biomolecular studies, torsion appears in physical settings including homological quantum rotor codes, discrete charges, and gauge sectors. We study torsion from both classical and quantum perspectives. Given a graph
G and its clique complex
K=Cl(G), we first prove that, for fixed
r and prime
p, deciding whether
Hr(K,Z) contains
p-torsion is NP-hard. As a corollary, when a homological rotor code is specified by
G, deciding whether the code has a finite-dimensional logical sector of a given order is NP-hard. We discuss related problems, including the Bockstein homomorphism, Smith normal form, lattice saturation, and cohomology. Second, for a finite set of primes
P, we develop a quantum algorithm that serves as a one-sided torsion witness. For fixed
r, it outputs WITNESS or INCONCLUSIVE, i.e. WITNESS certifies that either
Hr(K,Z) or
Hr−1(K,Z) contains
p-torsion for some
p∈P while INCONCLUSIVE makes no claim about its presence or absence. We identify a regime in which the algorithm achieves a near-quadratic quantum speedup over the corresponding classical algorithm under the same input model. Our NP-hardness result complements recent hardness results for estimating Betti numbers, adding a complexity-theoretic perspective to quantum TDA. Together, these results demonstrate that integral homology, beyond its Betti numbers, can be computationally challenging.
Even after decades of quantum computing development, examples of generally useful quantum algorithms with exponential speedups over classical counterparts are scarce. Recent progress in quantum algorithms for linear-algebra positioned quantum machine learning (QML) as a potential source of such useful exponential improvements. Yet, in an unexpected development, a recent series of "dequantization" results has equally rapidly removed the promise of exponential speedups for several QML algorithms. This raises the critical question whether exponential speedups of other linear-algebraic QML algorithms persist. In this paper, we study the quantum-algorithmic methods behind the algorithm for topological data analysis of Lloyd, Garnerone and Zanardi through this lens. We provide evidence that the problem solved by this algorithm is classically intractable by showing that its natural generalization is as hard as simulating the one clean qubit model – which is widely believed to require superpolynomial time on a classical computer – and is thus very likely immune to dequantizations. Based on this result, we provide a number of new quantum algorithms for problems such as rank estimation and complex network analysis, along with complexity-theoretic evidence for their classical intractability. Furthermore, we analyze the suitability of the proposed quantum algorithms for near-term implementations. Our results provide a number of useful applications for full-blown, and restricted quantum computers with a guaranteed exponential speedup over classical methods, recovering some of the potential for linear-algebraic QML to become one of quantum computing's killer applications.
We establish the average-case hardness of Betti number estimation on random clique complexes via a reduction from the planted clique problem. We further show that our reduction implies a series of hardness results for many problems in both classical and quantum Topological Data Analysis (qTDA). Under the classical planted clique conjecture, no randomized polynomial-time Betti number estimator achieves additive error below
21 with constant advantage. Under a new quantum planted clique conjecture that we introduce, the same conclusion holds for quantum polynomial-time algorithms. We also obtain related conditional hardness results for homology vanishing, additive approximations with larger error tolerances, preparation of simplex and harmonic states, cycle recovery, and counting eigenvalues at low energy. Our reduction clarifies the structural requirements for quantum advantage in TDA and provides a new lens to investigate the classical and quantum complexity of related problems.