Even after decades of quantum computing development, examples of generally useful quantum algorithms with exponential speedups over classical counterparts are scarce. Recent progress in quantum algorithms for linear-algebra positioned quantum machine learning (QML) as a potential source of such useful exponential improvements. Yet, in an unexpected development, a recent series of "dequantization" results has equally rapidly removed the promise of exponential speedups for several QML algorithms. This raises the critical question whether exponential speedups of other linear-algebraic QML algorithms persist. In this paper, we study the quantum-algorithmic methods behind the algorithm for topological data analysis of Lloyd, Garnerone and Zanardi through this lens. We provide evidence that the problem solved by this algorithm is classically intractable by showing that its natural generalization is as hard as simulating the one clean qubit model – which is widely believed to require superpolynomial time on a classical computer – and is thus very likely immune to dequantizations. Based on this result, we provide a number of new quantum algorithms for problems such as rank estimation and complex network analysis, along with complexity-theoretic evidence for their classical intractability. Furthermore, we analyze the suitability of the proposed quantum algorithms for near-term implementations. Our results provide a number of useful applications for full-blown, and restricted quantum computers with a guaranteed exponential speedup over classical methods, recovering some of the potential for linear-algebraic QML to become one of quantum computing's killer applications.
Even after decades of quantum computing development, examples of generally useful quantum algorithms with exponential speedups over classical counterparts are scarce. Recent progress in quantum algorithms for linear-algebra positioned quantum machine learning (QML) as a potential source of such useful exponential improvements. Yet, in an unexpected development, a recent series of "dequantization" results has equally rapidly removed the promise of exponential speedups for several QML algorithms. This raises the critical question whether exponential speedups of other linear-algebraic QML algorithms persist. In this paper, we study the quantum-algorithmic methods behind the algorithm for topological data analysis of Lloyd, Garnerone and Zanardi through this lens. We provide evidence that the problem solved by this algorithm is classically intractable by showing that its natural generalization is as hard as simulating the one clean qubit model – which is widely believed to require superpolynomial time on a classical computer – and is thus very likely immune to dequantizations. Based on this result, we provide a number of new quantum algorithms for problems such as rank estimation and complex network analysis, along with complexity-theoretic evidence for their classical intractability. Furthermore, we analyze the suitability of the proposed quantum algorithms for near-term implementations. Our results provide a number of useful applications for full-blown, and restricted quantum computers with a guaranteed exponential speedup over classical methods, recovering some of the potential for linear-algebraic QML to become one of quantum computing's killer applications.
A particularly promising line of quantum machine leaning (QML) algorithms with the potential to exhibit exponential speedups over their classical counterparts has recently been set back by a series of dequantization results, that is, quantum-inspired classical algorithms which perform equally well in essence. This raises the important question whether other QML algorithms are susceptible to such dequantization, or whether it can be formally argued that they are out of reach of classical computers. In this paper, we study the quantum algorithm for topological data analysis by Lloyd, Garnerone and Zanardi (LGZ). We provide evidence that certain crucial steps in this algorithm solve problems that are classically intractable by closely relating them to the one clean qubit model, a restricted model of quantum computation whose power is strongly believed to lie beyond that of classical computation. While our results do not imply that the topological data analysis problem solved by the LGZ algorithm (i.e., Betti number estimation) is itself DQC1-hard, our work does provide the first steps towards answering the question of whether it is out of reach of classical computers. Additionally, we discuss how to extend the applicability of this algorithm beyond its original aim of estimating Betti numbers and demonstrate this by looking into quantum algorithms for spectral entropy estimation. Finally, we briefly consider the suitability of the LGZ algorithm for near-term implementations.
Quantum computing offers the potential of exponential speedups for certain classical computations. Over the last decade, many quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms have been proposed as candidates for such exponential improvements. However, two issues unravel the hope of exponential speedup for some of these QML algorithms: the data-loading problem and, more recently, the stunning dequantization results of Tang et al. A third issue, namely the fault-tolerance requirements of most QML algorithms, has further hindered their practical realization. The quantum topological data analysis (QTDA) algorithm of Lloyd, Garnerone and Zanardi was one of the first QML algorithms that convincingly offered an expected exponential speedup. From the outset, it did not suffer from the data-loading problem. A recent result has also shown that the generalized problem solved by this algorithm is likely classically intractable, and would therefore be immune to any dequantization efforts. However, the QTDA algorithm of Lloyd et~al. has a time complexity of O(n4/(ε2δ)) (where n is the number of data points, ε is the error tolerance, and δ is the smallest nonzero eigenvalue of the restricted Laplacian) and requires fault-tolerant quantum computing, which has not yet been achieved. In this paper, we completely overhaul the QTDA algorithm to achieve an improved exponential speedup and depth complexity of O(nlog(1/(δε))). Our approach includes three key innovations: (a) an efficient realization of the combinatorial Laplacian as a sum of Pauli operators; (b) a quantum rejection sampling approach to restrict the superposition to the simplices in the complex; and (c) a stochastic rank estimation method to estimate the Betti numbers. We present a theoretical error analysis, and the circuit and computational time and depth complexities for Betti number estimation.
Quantum algorithms for topological data analysis (TDA) seem to provide an exponential advantage over the best classical approach while remaining immune to dequantization procedures and the data-loading problem.In this paper, we give complexity-theoretic evidence that the central task of TDA-estimating Betti numbers-is intractable even for quantum computers.Specifically, we prove that the problem of computing Betti numbers exactly is #P-hard, while the problem of approximating Betti numbers up to multiplicative error is NP-hard.Moreover, both problems retain their hardness if restricted to the regime where quantum algorithms for TDA perform best.Because quantum computers are not expected to solve #P-hard or NP-hard problems in subexponential time, our results imply that quantum algorithms for TDA offer only a polynomial advantage in the worst case.We support our claim by showing that the seminal quantum algorithm for TDA developed by Lloyd, Garnerone, and Zanardi achieves a quadratic speedup over the best-known classical approach in asymptotically almost all cases.Finally, we argue that an exponential quantum advantage can be recovered if the input data is given as a specification of simplices rather than as a list of vertices and edges.
Prior work has explored quantum algorithms for topological data analysis (TDA), revealing the possibility of exponential quantum speedups in estimating the ratios of Betti numbers to the dimension of the combinatorial Laplacian. However, this quantity is only non-vanishing and efficient-to-quantumly-estimate when Betti numbers are exponentially large, a case for which concrete examples are rarely known. Furthermore, certain randomized classical algorithms are sometimes efficient in this regime. Thus, the prospect of achieving quantum advantage in conventional TDA appears fairly narrow. Here, we address these challenges to the quantum advantage in TDA by developing quantum algorithms for Mayer homology, which generalize simplicial homology to N-nilpotent boundary operators (∂N=0) and have recently been successfully applied to real-world TDA contexts. We introduce an efficient quantum algorithm for estimating Mayer Betti numbers and their persistent counterparts. We then prove that for high-order simplices, Mayer Betti numbers are often exponentially large in the dense regime, which ameliorates the normalization bottleneck of conventional quantum TDA. In the same regime, we argue that existing dequantization algorithms developed for conventional TDA, when applied to Mayer homology, generally lose theoretical guaranties, facing certain structural barriers that prevent their practical utilities. We also provide logical resource estimates revealing that a quantum computer with roughly a few hundred qubits and sixty million Toffoli gates could solve Mayer homology problems beyond the capabilities of known classical approaches. Finally, we discuss real-world applications of Mayer homology in genomics, supersymmetry, drug discovery, and neuroscience, revealing the potential of our quantum algorithm to deliver real-world impacts via Mayer homology.
Quantum algorithms for topological data analysis (TDA) seem to provide an exponential advantage over the best classical approach while remaining immune to dequantization procedures and the data-loading problem. In this paper, we give complexity-theoretic evidence that the central task of TDA -- estimating Betti numbers -- is intractable even for quantum computers. Specifically, we prove that the problem of computing Betti numbers exactly is #P-hard, while the problem of approximating Betti numbers up to multiplicative error is NP-hard. Moreover, both problems retain their hardness if restricted to the regime where quantum algorithms for TDA perform best. Because quantum computers are not expected to solve #P-hard or NP-hard problems in subexponential time, our results imply that quantum algorithms for TDA offer only a polynomial advantage in the worst case. We support our claim by showing that the seminal quantum algorithm for TDA developed by Lloyd, Garnerone and Zanardi achieves a quadratic speedup over the best known classical approach in asymptotically almost all cases. Finally, we argue that an exponential quantum advantage can be recovered if the input data is given as a specification of simplices rather than as a list of vertices and edges.
Lloyd [Nat. Commun. , 10138 (2016)] were first to demonstrate the promise of quantum algorithms for computing Betti numbers, a way to characterize topological features of data sets. Here, we propose, analyze, and optimize an improved quantum algorithm for topological data analysis (TDA) with reduced scaling, including a method for preparing Dicke states based on inequality testing, a more efficient amplitude estimation algorithm using Kaiser windows, and an optimal implementation of eigenvalue projectors based on Chebyshev polynomials. We compile our approach to a fault-tolerant gate set and estimate constant factors in the Toffoli complexity. Our analysis reveals that superquadratic quantum speedups are only possible for this problem when targeting a multiplicative error approximation and the Betti number grows asymptotically. Further, we propose a dequantization of the quantum TDA algorithm that shows that having exponentially large dimension and Betti number are necessary, but insufficient conditions, for superpolynomial advantage. We then introduce and analyze specific problem examples which have parameters in the regime where superpolynomial advantages may be achieved, and argue that quantum circuits with tens of billions of Toffoli gates can solve seemingly classically intractable instances. Published by the American Physical Society 2024