Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as an interdisciplinary field that harnesses the potential of quantum computing to revolutionize classical machine learning paradigms. This paper presents a benchmarking study focused on four quantum classifier algorithms: Quantum Support Vector Classifier (QSVC), Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC), Quantum Neural Network Classifier (QNNC) and Pegasos Quantum Support Vector Classifier (PegasosQSVC). These quantum classifiers hold promise for unlocking quantum advantages in classification tasks. However, a systematic assessment of their performance across diverse datasets is yet to be fully explored. In this research study, we evaluate and compare the classification performance of quantum machine learning classifiers on various datasets (Breast Cancer, Diabetes, and Titanic) and compare them to a classical model. Our findings revealed that PegasosQSVC consistently maintained high performance across all datasets with the highest average accuracy, recall, and F1-score values of 0.81, 0.72, and 0.71, respectively, followed by VQC, followed by VQC, while QSVC and QNNC perform variably. Nevertheless, QSVC was found to balance performance and training time, achieving an average accuracy of 0.81 and a training time of 177 seconds. Overall, the classical model surpassed QML models as it was up to 10% higher in average accuracy.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as an interdisciplinary field that harnesses the potential of quantum computing to revolutionize classical machine learning paradigms. This paper presents a benchmarking study focused on four quantum classifier algorithms: Quantum Support Vector Classifier (QSVC), Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC), Quantum Neural Network Classifier (QNNC) and Pegasos Quantum Support Vector Classifier (PegasosQSVC). These quantum classifiers hold promise for unlocking quantum advantages in classification tasks. However, a systematic assessment of their performance across diverse datasets is yet to be fully explored. In this research study, we evaluate and compare the classification performance of quantum machine learning classifiers on various datasets (Breast Cancer, Diabetes, and Titanic) and compare them to a classical model. Our findings revealed that PegasosQSVC consistently maintained high performance across all datasets with the highest average accuracy, recall, and F1-score values of 0.81, 0.72, and 0.71, respectively, followed by VQC, followed by VQC, while QSVC and QNNC perform variably. Nevertheless, QSVC was found to balance performance and training time, achieving an average accuracy of 0.81 and a training time of 177 seconds. Overall, the classical model surpassed QML models as it was up to 10% higher in average accuracy.
A potential path forward is Quantum Machine Learning (QML), which aims to leverage quantum computing in conjunction with classical machine learning to enhance computing efficiency and the expressiveness of models. In this paper, two different quantum classifiers - Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC) and Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machine (QSVM) - are compared with three classical classifiers as baseline classifiers - Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) - on the Breast Cancer Wisconsin dataset. The quantum circuits were created in the PennyLane framework and simulated on a classical backend. However, in terms of accuracy, classical Logistic Regression performed better with an accuracy of 97.8%, classical SVM and QSVM with an accuracy of 95.6% each, although the Quantum VQC achieved a lower accuracy of 88.9% and had a recall of 100% for the benign class, though it correctly identified only 12 of the 17 malignant cases (a malignant-class recall of approximately 70.6%). The drawback of quantum models is the higher training time; however, since the quantum circuit needs to be classically simulated, the quantum SVM took 23.29 seconds compared to less than 0.01 seconds for the classical linear models. These results indicate that for small structured datasets, classifiers based on quantum computing have not yet surpassed well-tuned classical counterparts. In some respects (e.g., benign-class recall), they perform competitively, though not on malignant-class recall, where the VQC in particular performed worse than the classical baselines, which is worth further investigation on real quantum computers.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as a paradigm that combines the computational advantages of quantum computing with the predictive capabilities of machine learning to address complex data classification problems. As data dimensionality increases rapidly and classical learning algorithms face scalability constraints, QML leverages quantum parallelism, entanglement, and high-dimensional Hilbert space representations to enhance learning performance. This paper reviews and analyses advanced QML algorithms, including Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM), Variational Quantum Circuits (VQC), Quantum Neural Networks (QNN), and Quantum Kernel Estimation, for optimizing both binary and multi-class classification tasks under high-complexity conditions. The proposed QML framework is evaluated on benchmark datasets like MNIST, the Breast Cancer Wisconsin (BCW) dataset, and synthetic nonlinear datasets, and is compared against classical machine learning baselines, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forests (RF), and Deep Neural Networks (DNN). The results demonstrate notable improvements in classification accuracy (up to 96.8%), decision margins, and computational efficiency in quantum-suitable data regimes, while also highlighting current limitations related to noise, circuit depth, and hardware constraints. Overall, the study presents a unified QML framework, theoretical formulations, and experimental evaluations that illustrate the potential of quantum algorithms for next-generation classification tasks.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) integrates principles of quantum computation with statistical learning to address classification tasks. This paper conducts a comparative study of three paradigms—classical Support Vector Classification (SVC), Quantum Support Vector Classification (QSVC) using quantum kernels, and QSVC enhanced via the Pegasos stochastic algorithm. We benchmark classification accuracy on a SARS-CoV-2 dataset, analyzing model robustness and resource requirements. Our results indicate that while classical SVC maintains superior scalability and stability for large datasets, QSVC variants show competitive accuracy across simulator backends (Central Processing Units or CPUs and Graphical Processor Units or GPUs) and may achieve quantum advantage as hardware matures. Implications for hybrid workflows and future research directions are discussed.
This study explores the performance of Quantum Support Vector Classifiers (QSVCs) and Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) in comparison to classical models for machine learning tasks. By evaluating these models on the Iris and MNIST-PCA datasets, we find that quantum models tend to outperform classical approaches as the problem complexity increases. While QSVCs generally provide more consistent results, QNNs exhibit superior performance in higher-complexity tasks due to their increased quantum load. Additionally, we analyze the impact of hyperparameter tuning, showing that feature maps and ansatz configurations significantly influence model accuracy. We also compare the PennyLane and Qiskit frameworks, concluding that Qiskit provides better optimization and efficiency for our implementation. These findings highlight the potential of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) for complex classification problems and provide insights into model selection and optimization strategies
Intrusion detection systems (IDS) are essential for identifying cyber threats in complex digital environments. Machine learning (ML) is widely used to improve IDS by detecting anomalies, but classical ML methods often struggle with high-dimensional data and evolving threats. Quantum machine learning (QML) has been proposed as a potential paradigm to overcome some of these limitations, but is constrained by noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) challenges, affecting quality. This study systematically evaluates three QML models, Pegasos Quantum Support Vector Classifier (QSVC), Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC), and a Hybrid Quantum–Classical Neural Network (HQNN), for network anomaly detection. The models were optimized and tested on the ToN_IoT and NSL-KDD datasets using IBM quantum simulators under both ideal and noisy conditions. Performance was analyzed through the F1-score distribution as a function of circuit complexity, revealing how entanglement and noise affect robustness across different backends. Comparisons with classical models contextualize the current maturity of QML for cybersecurity, while computational time was used as an indicator of model complexity to explore accuracy–efficiency trade-offs. Among all configurations, Pegasos-QSVC achieved the best results, with 94.60% accuracy and an F1-score of 94.13%. The findings provide practical guidelines for designing noise-resilient QML models and highlight their potential for reliable intrusion detection under realistic quantum conditions.
Advancements in quantum computing have sparked a systematic evaluation of quantum machine learning (QML) models, focusing on their behavior and performance across diverse learning tasks such as classification, regression, generative modeling, and feature compression. The primary focus is on assessing the performance and behavior of various QML architectures-including Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs), Quantum Support Vector Classifiers (QSVCs), Quantum Generative Adversarial Networks (QGANs), Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNNs), and Quantum Autoencoders (QAEs)-implemented using Qiskit's machine learning library. This evaluation is conducted using an existing benchmarking framework that ensures consistent experimental conditions and supports flexible evaluation strategies. To provide additional context and insight, these quantum models are compared against classical counterparts using widely adopted implementations. Experiments are carried out on a range of datasets, including structured and low-dimensional examples like Bars and Stripes, as well as more complex datasets like Downscaled MNIST and synthetic Hyperplanes. By providing a standardized evaluation of these models within the Qiskit framework, this study establishes a reproducible performance baseline and highlights key challenges for QML systems in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era.