Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)

Robust Quantum Control for Set-Membership Hamiltonian Uncertainty

Robert L. Kosut, HERSCHEL A. RABITZ

Published Sep 17, 2023• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

We provide a brief review of a recently proposed approach to robust quantum control which rests on three theoretical foundations: the classic method of averaging, set-membership uncertainty modeling, and the known topological properties of the quantum control landscape. Application of the method of averaging directly results in a multi-criterion optimization problem consisting of the uncertainty-free fidelity competing with a generic robustness measure, the latter being a norm of a time-domain product of a function of the uncertainty-free system and the character of the uncertainty set. If this term is sufficiently small, then at most, only fourth order error effects can accrue. Lastly, the topological features promote a two-stage algorithm: in stage-1 the uncertainty-free fidelity is set to a high threshold, then in stage-2 the robustness measure is minimized while maintaing the threshold. Each stage-2 control update is found by solving a convex optimization problem.

DOI
10.1109/qce57702.2023.00147

Related papers

Robust Quantum Control: Analysis & Synthesis via Averaging

Robert L. Kosut, Gaurav Bhole, HERSCHEL A. RABITZ

An approach is presented for robustness analysis and quantum (unitary) control synthesis based on the classic method of averaging. The result is a multicriterion optimization competing the nominal (uncertainty-free) fidelity with a well known robustness measure: the size of an interaction (error) Hamiltonian, essentially the first term in the Magnus expansion of an interaction unitary. Combining this with the fact that the topology of the control landscape at high fidelity is determined by the null space of the nominal fidelity Hessian, we arrive at a new two-stage algorithm. Once the nominal fidelity is sufficiently high, we approximate both the nominal fidelity and robustness measure as quadratics in the control increments. An optimal solution is obtained by solving a convex optimization for the control increments at each iteration to keep the nominal fidelity high and reduce the robustness measure. Additionally, by separating fidelity from the robustness measure, more flexibility is available for uncertainty modeling.

arXiv:2208.14193•Aug 30, 2022•6 citations

Robust control of quantum dynamics under input and parameter uncertainty

Andy Koswara, Vaibhav Bhutoria, Raj Chakrabarti

Despite significant progress in theoretical and laboratory quantum control, engineering quantum systems remains principally challenging due to manifestation of noise and uncertainties associated with the field and Hamiltonian parameters. In this paper, we extend and generalize the asymptotic quantum control robustness analysis method, which provides more accurate estimates of quantum control objective moments than standard leading-order techniques, to diverse quantum observables, gates, and moments thereof and also introduce the Pontryagin maximum principle for quantum robust control. In addition, we present a Pareto optimization framework for achieving robust control via evolutionary open-loop (model-based) and closed-loop (model-free) approaches with the mechanisms of robustness and convergence described using asymptotic quantum control robustness analysis. In the open-loop approach, a multiobjective genetic algorithm is used to obtain Pareto solutions in terms of the expectation and variance of the transition probability under Hamiltonian parameter uncertainty. The set of numerically determined solutions can then be used as a starting population for model-free learning control in a feedback loop. The closed-loop approach utilizes a real-coded genetic algorithm with adaptive exploration and exploitation operators in order to preserve solution diversity and dynamically optimize the transition probability in the presence of field noise. Together, these methods provide a foundation for high-fidelity adaptive feedback control of quantum systems wherein open-loop control predictions are iteratively improved based on data from closed-loop experiments.

arXiv:2102.11813•Physical Review A•Nov 30, 2021•19 citations

A Fundamental Bound for Robust Quantum Gate Control

Robert L. Kosut, Daniel A. Lidar, Herschel Rabitz

We derive a universal performance limit for coherent quantum control in the presence of modeled and unmodeled uncertainties. For any target unitary $W$ that is implementable in the absence of error, we prove that the worst-case (and hence the average) gate fidelity obeys the lower bound $F \ge \Flb\bigl(\tf \Omeff\bigr)$, where $\tf$ is the gate duration and $\Omeff$ is a single frequency-like measure that aggregates \emph{all} bounded uncertainty sources, e.g., coherent control imperfections, unknown couplings, and residual environment interactions, without assuming an initially factorizable system-bath state or a completely positive map. The bound is obtained by combining an interaction-picture averaging method with a Bellman-Gronwall inequality and holds for any finite-norm Hamiltonian decomposition. Hence it applies equally to qubits, multi-level qudits, and ancilla-assisted operations. Because $\Flb$ depends only on the dimensionless product $\tf\Omeff$, it yields a device-independent metric that certifies whether a given hardware platform can, in principle, reach a specified fault-tolerance threshold, and also sets a quantitative target for robust-control synthesis and system identification.

arXiv:2507.01215•Jul 1, 2025•0 citations

Robustness of controlled quantum dynamics

Andy Koswara, Raj Chakrabarti

The control of multilevel quantum systems is sensitive to implementation errors in the control field and uncertainties associated with system Hamiltonian parameters. A small variation in the control field spectrum or the system Hamiltonian can cause an otherwise optimal field to deviate from controlling desired quantum state transitions and reaching a particular objective. An accurate analysis of robustness is thus essential in understanding and achieving model-based quantum control, such as in the control of chemical reactions based on ab initio or experimental estimates of the molecular Hamiltonian. In this paper, theoretical foundations for quantum control robustness analysis are presented from both a distributional perspective---in terms of moments of the transition amplitude, interferences, and transition probability---and a worst-case perspective. Based on this theory, analytical expressions and a computationally efficient method for determining the robustness of coherently controlled quantum dynamics are derived. The robustness analysis reveals that there generally exists a set of control pathways that are more resistant to destructive interferences in the presence of control field and system parameter uncertainty. These robust pathways interfere and combine to yield a relatively accurate transition amplitude and high transition probability when uncertainty is present.

arXiv:1409.8096•Physical Review A•Oct 22, 2014•10 citations

Closed‐Loop and Robust Control of Quantum Systems

Chunlin Chen, Lincheng Wang, Yuanlong Wang

For most practical quantum control systems, it is important and difficult to attain robustness and reliability due to unavoidable uncertainties in the system dynamics or models. Three kinds of typical approaches (e.g., closed-loop learning control, feedback control, and robust control) have been proved to be effective to solve these problems. This work presents a self-contained survey on the closed-loop and robust control of quantum systems, as well as a brief introduction to a selection of basic theories and methods in this research area, to provide interested readers with a general idea for further studies. In the area of closed-loop learning control of quantum systems, we survey and introduce such learning control methods as gradient-based methods, genetic algorithms (GA), and reinforcement learning (RL) methods from a unified point of view of exploring the quantum control landscapes. For the feedback control approach, the paper surveys three control strategies including Lyapunov control, measurement-based control, and coherent-feedback control. Then such topics in the field of quantum robust control as H(∞) control, sliding mode control, quantum risk-sensitive control, and quantum ensemble control are reviewed. The paper concludes with a perspective of future research directions that are likely to attract more attention.

The Scientific World JOURNAL•Jan 1, 2013•23 citations

Modeling and Control of Quantum Systems: An Introduction

Claudio Altafini, F. Ticozzi

The scope of this work is to provide a self-contained introduction to a selection of basic theoretical aspects in the modeling and control of quantum mechanical systems, as well as a brief survey on the main approaches to control synthesis. While part of the existing theory, especially in the open-loop setting, stems directly from classical control theory (most notably geometric control and optimal control), a number of tools specifically tailored for quantum systems have been developed since the 1980s, in order to take into account their distinctive features: the probabilistic nature of atomic-scale physical systems, the effect of dissipation and the irreversible character of the measurements have all proved to be critical in feedback-design problems. The relevant dynamical models for both closed and open quantum systems are presented, along with the main results on their controllability and stability. A brief review of several currently available control design methods is meant to provide the interested reader with a roadmap for further studies.

arXiv:1210.7127•IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control•Jul 19, 2012•249 citations
We provide a brief review of a recently proposed approach to robust quantum control which rests on three theoretical foundations: the classic method of averaging, set-membership uncertainty modeling, and the known topological properties of the quantum control landscape. Application of the method of averaging directly results in a multi-criterion optimization problem consisting of the uncertainty-free fidelity competing with a generic robustness measure, the latter being a norm of a time-domain product of a function of the uncertainty-free system and the character of the uncertainty set. If this term is sufficiently small, then at most, only fourth order error effects can accrue. Lastly, the topological features promote a two-stage algorithm: in stage-1 the uncertainty-free fidelity is set to a high threshold, then in stage-2 the robustness measure is minimized while maintaing the threshold. Each stage-2 control update is found by solving a convex optimization problem.
An approach is presented for robustness analysis and quantum (unitary) control synthesis based on the classic method of averaging. The result is a multicriterion optimization competing the nominal (uncertainty-free) fidelity with a well known robustness measure: the size of an interaction (error) Hamiltonian, essentially the first term in the Magnus expansion of an interaction unitary. Combining this with the fact that the topology of the control landscape at high fidelity is determined by the null space of the nominal fidelity Hessian, we arrive at a new two-stage algorithm. Once the nominal fidelity is sufficiently high, we approximate both the nominal fidelity and robustness measure as quadratics in the control increments. An optimal solution is obtained by solving a convex optimization for the control increments at each iteration to keep the nominal fidelity high and reduce the robustness measure. Additionally, by separating fidelity from the robustness measure, more flexibility is available for uncertainty modeling.
Despite significant progress in theoretical and laboratory quantum control, engineering quantum systems remains principally challenging due to manifestation of noise and uncertainties associated with the field and Hamiltonian parameters. In this paper, we extend and generalize the asymptotic quantum control robustness analysis method, which provides more accurate estimates of quantum control objective moments than standard leading-order techniques, to diverse quantum observables, gates, and moments thereof and also introduce the Pontryagin maximum principle for quantum robust control. In addition, we present a Pareto optimization framework for achieving robust control via evolutionary open-loop (model-based) and closed-loop (model-free) approaches with the mechanisms of robustness and convergence described using asymptotic quantum control robustness analysis. In the open-loop approach, a multiobjective genetic algorithm is used to obtain Pareto solutions in terms of the expectation and variance of the transition probability under Hamiltonian parameter uncertainty. The set of numerically determined solutions can then be used as a starting population for model-free learning control in a feedback loop. The closed-loop approach utilizes a real-coded genetic algorithm with adaptive exploration and exploitation operators in order to preserve solution diversity and dynamically optimize the transition probability in the presence of field noise. Together, these methods provide a foundation for high-fidelity adaptive feedback control of quantum systems wherein open-loop control predictions are iteratively improved based on data from closed-loop experiments.
We derive a universal performance limit for coherent quantum control in the presence of modeled and unmodeled uncertainties. For any target unitary WWW that is implementable in the absence of error, we prove that the worst-case (and hence the average) gate fidelity obeys the lower bound $F \ge \Flb\bigl(\tf \Omeff\bigr)$, where $\tf$ is the gate duration and $\Omeff$ is a single frequency-like measure that aggregates \emph{all} bounded uncertainty sources, e.g., coherent control imperfections, unknown couplings, and residual environment interactions, without assuming an initially factorizable system-bath state or a completely positive map. The bound is obtained by combining an interaction-picture averaging method with a Bellman-Gronwall inequality and holds for any finite-norm Hamiltonian decomposition. Hence it applies equally to qubits, multi-level qudits, and ancilla-assisted operations. Because $\Flb$ depends only on the dimensionless product $\tf\Omeff$, it yields a device-independent metric that certifies whether a given hardware platform can, in principle, reach a specified fault-tolerance threshold, and also sets a quantitative target for robust-control synthesis and system identification.
The control of multilevel quantum systems is sensitive to implementation errors in the control field and uncertainties associated with system Hamiltonian parameters. A small variation in the control field spectrum or the system Hamiltonian can cause an otherwise optimal field to deviate from controlling desired quantum state transitions and reaching a particular objective. An accurate analysis of robustness is thus essential in understanding and achieving model-based quantum control, such as in the control of chemical reactions based on ab initio or experimental estimates of the molecular Hamiltonian. In this paper, theoretical foundations for quantum control robustness analysis are presented from both a distributional perspective---in terms of moments of the transition amplitude, interferences, and transition probability---and a worst-case perspective. Based on this theory, analytical expressions and a computationally efficient method for determining the robustness of coherently controlled quantum dynamics are derived. The robustness analysis reveals that there generally exists a set of control pathways that are more resistant to destructive interferences in the presence of control field and system parameter uncertainty. These robust pathways interfere and combine to yield a relatively accurate transition amplitude and high transition probability when uncertainty is present.
For most practical quantum control systems, it is important and difficult to attain robustness and reliability due to unavoidable uncertainties in the system dynamics or models. Three kinds of typical approaches (e.g., closed-loop learning control, feedback control, and robust control) have been proved to be effective to solve these problems. This work presents a self-contained survey on the closed-loop and robust control of quantum systems, as well as a brief introduction to a selection of basic theories and methods in this research area, to provide interested readers with a general idea for further studies. In the area of closed-loop learning control of quantum systems, we survey and introduce such learning control methods as gradient-based methods, genetic algorithms (GA), and reinforcement learning (RL) methods from a unified point of view of exploring the quantum control landscapes. For the feedback control approach, the paper surveys three control strategies including Lyapunov control, measurement-based control, and coherent-feedback control. Then such topics in the field of quantum robust control as H(∞) control, sliding mode control, quantum risk-sensitive control, and quantum ensemble control are reviewed. The paper concludes with a perspective of future research directions that are likely to attract more attention.
The scope of this work is to provide a self-contained introduction to a selection of basic theoretical aspects in the modeling and control of quantum mechanical systems, as well as a brief survey on the main approaches to control synthesis. While part of the existing theory, especially in the open-loop setting, stems directly from classical control theory (most notably geometric control and optimal control), a number of tools specifically tailored for quantum systems have been developed since the 1980s, in order to take into account their distinctive features: the probabilistic nature of atomic-scale physical systems, the effect of dissipation and the irreversible character of the measurements have all proved to be critical in feedback-design problems. The relevant dynamical models for both closed and open quantum systems are presented, along with the main results on their controllability and stability. A brief review of several currently available control design methods is meant to provide the interested reader with a roadmap for further studies.