Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Über die Umkehrung der Naturgesetze

Erwin Schrödinger

Published Jun 18, 2007• 64 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract A decade before his 1926 paperb reporting his discovery of wave mechanics, a derivation of the time-independent wave equation, and its solutions for hydrogen-like atoms, Erwin Schrödinger had carried out several studies dealing with Brownian motion. It is clear from several of the papers he wrote that he was completely familiar with diffusion equations, the Fokker-Planck equation in many forms, their connections with Green’s functions, and with behavior of systems of particles undergoing random walks including those in force fields.c Thus, it is not surprising that Schrödinger was aware of the relation of the Schrödinger equation in imaginary time, to the diffusion equation governing particles undergoing diffusion, In this paper, with the title “On the Reversal of Natural Laws,” Schrödinger pointed out the remarkable formal analogy of diffusion with quantum mechanics and the discrepancies introduced by the factor J=T. In his discussion Schrödinger made the statement, “I am unable to foresee whether this analogy will prove itself useful in the clarification of quantum mechanical concepts,” but he finished the paper with the hope it would. There is no indication that Schrödinger was aware of the possibilities of a next step into quantum Monte Carlo - the use of random walks to provide solutions to the wave equation. This was left for others to discover later.

DOI
10.1093/oso/9780195310108.003.0001

Related papers

E. Schrödinger’s 1931 paper “On the Reversal of the Laws of Nature” [“Über die Umkehrung der Naturgesetze”, Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, physikalisch-mathematische Klasse, 8 N9 144–153]

Raphaël Chétrite, Paolo Muratore-Ginanneschi, Kay Schwieger

Abstract We present an English translation of Erwin Schrödinger’s paper on “On the Reversal of the Laws of Nature‘’. In this paper, Schrödinger analyses the idea of time reversal of a diffusion process. Schrödinger’s paper acted as a prominent source of inspiration for the works of Bernstein on reciprocal processes and of Kolmogorov on time reversal properties of Markov processes and detailed balance. The ideas outlined by Schrödinger also inspired the development of probabilistic interpretations of quantum mechanics by Fényes, Nelson and others as well as the notion of “Euclidean Quantum Mechanics” as probabilistic analogue of quantization. In the second part of the paper, Schrödinger discusses the relation between time reversal and statistical laws of physics. We emphasize in our commentary the relevance of Schrödinger’s intuitions for contemporary developments in statistical nano-physics.

arXiv:2105.12617•The European Physical Journal H•Nov 22, 2021•26 citations

Schrödinger’s View of Natural Laws

Robert Aebi

This is an exploration with today’s tools of probability theory into the mystery of ‘Über die Umkehrung der Naturgesetze’ (On time-reversal of natural laws) written by Erwin Schrödinger in 1931. He propagates the idea that diffusions given their marginal distributions at finite initial and final time are time-reversible. We are going to meet clouds of identical and independent particles considering them as realizations of diffusions. The particle dynamics is assumed to be known. Given the observation of such a cloud in terms of distribution densities at finite initial and final time, the intention is to find the ‘most probable’ distribution density of the cloud at intermediate times.

Birkhäuser Basel eBooks•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Schrödinger and wave mechanics

Malcolm S. Longair

On 13 March 1926, the first of six papers on wave mechanics by Erwin Schrödinger was published in the Annalen der Physik with the title Quantisation as an eigenvalue problem (Part 1) (Schrödinger, 1926b). The startling first paragraph reads: ‘In this paper, I wish to consider, first, the simple case of the hydrogen atom (nonrelativistic and unperturbed), and show that the customary quantum conditions can be replaced by another postulate, in which the concept of “whole numbers”, merely as such, is not introduced. Rather, when integralness does appear, it arises in the same natural way as it does in the case of node-numbers of a vibrating string. The new conception is capable of generalisation, and strikes, I believe, very deeply at the true nature of quantum rules.’ These papers were the fruits of an extraordinary burst of creativity on Schrödinger's part which resulted from his interactions with Einstein in the latter part of 1925. Central to these exchanges were de Broglie's remarkable researches which culminated in his famous PhD dissertation and published papers of 1924. These events have already be recounted in Chap. 9. The subsequent developments which led to Schrödinger's discovery of the equation which bears his name will be taken up in Sect. 14.2, but let us first understand more about Schrödinger's background. Schrödinger's background in physics and mathematics Education and career up to 1925 Unlike Heisenberg, Jordan, Pauli and Dirac, Erwin Schrödinger was not one of the young Turks who developed Knabenphysik , young man's physics.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 31, 2013•0 citations

Schrödinger's Equation and Classical Brownian Motion

Garnet N. Ord

In the context of quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's equation has many possible interpretations, none of which appear to be entirely satisfactory. One reason for this is that there is no known microscopic model which yields both Schrödinger's equation and an accompanying ‘sensible’ interpretation. In contrast to this the diffusion equation is well known as a phenomenological equation obtainable from the microscopic model of Brownian motion. In this case the microscopic model provides an unambiguous interpretation of the partial differential equation. In this article we review work which shows that Schrödinger's equation by itself is also easily obtained from a lattice random walk version of the Brownian motion model. In this system, Schrödinger's equation arises by projection and the interpretation of wave functions is as direct and unambiguous as the interpretation of density in the diffusion case. However the direct interpretation is compatible with quantum mechanics only in a statistical sense in the context of ensembles of particles. This shows that measurement theory is the aspect of quantum theory which harbours the problems of interpretation, and we suggest the study of this and related systems to clearly illuminate the boundary between dynamics and measurement.

Fortschritte der Physik•Nov 1, 1998•5 citations

Quantum mechanics emerging from complex Brownian motions

Mohsen Farshad

The connection between the Schrödinger equation and Einstein's diffusion theory based on the Brownian motion of independent particles is well known. However, in contrast to diffusion theory, quantum mechanics theory has suffered controversial interpretations due to the counterintuitive concept of wavefunction. Here, while we confirm there is no difference in the mathematical form of these two equations, we derive the imaginary version of displacement. Using the diffusion theory of particles in a medium, as simple as it is, we describe that quantum mechanics is just an elegant and subtle equation to describe the probability of all the trajectories that a particle can take to propagate in time by a predictive wavefunction. Therefore, information on the position of particles through time in quantum theory is embedded in the wavefunction, which predicts the evolution of an ensemble of individual Brownian particles.

Physics Essays•Sep 15, 2024•2 citations

On stochastic theories of quantum mechanics

James G. Gilson

Introduction. There exists a very comprehensive theory concerning the time development of probabilistic systems. This is the Theory of Stochastic processes (1). Quantum mechanics as described by the Schrödinger equation rests very heavily on probabilistic interpretation, and yet, after forty years of remarkably rapid advances and successes, it is not clear how it is related to stochastic theory. The formal similarity of certain aspects of, and equations used in these two theories are well known. The diffusion equation corresponds to the Schrödinger equation, a correspondence only marred by a square root of minus unity appearing with the time derivative in the latter equation. The Kolmogoroff–Chapman relation for probabilities in Brownian motion has an analogue (2) in quantum mechanics, not for probabilities though, but for the complex probability amplitudes. The uncertainty relation also has a stochastic analogue (3). Some of these analogous characteristics are actually symptomatic of the gulf which separates these two theories. There are solutions to the diffusion equation which have a very clear physical probabilistic meaning. This is not the case with the corresponding and formally similar solutions to the Schrödinger equation and is partly due to the √ − 1 mentioned earlier. The probabilistic interpretation of the solutions to the diffusion equation is direct and immediate. On the other hand, the probabilistic interpretation of the solutions, ψ of the Schrödinger equation involve the introduction of the probability density, p = ψ*ψ. One great difference between these two theories lies in their each having distinct principles of linear superposition. In Stochastic Theory probabilities are superposed and in quantum mechanics amplitudes or wave functions are superposed.

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society•Oct 1, 1968•36 citations
Abstract A decade before his 1926 paperb reporting his discovery of wave mechanics, a derivation of the time-independent wave equation, and its solutions for hydrogen-like atoms, Erwin Schrödinger had carried out several studies dealing with Brownian motion. It is clear from several of the papers he wrote that he was completely familiar with diffusion equations, the Fokker-Planck equation in many forms, their connections with Green’s functions, and with behavior of systems of particles undergoing random walks including those in force fields.c Thus, it is not surprising that Schrödinger was aware of the relation of the Schrödinger equation in imaginary time, to the diffusion equation governing particles undergoing diffusion, In this paper, with the title “On the Reversal of Natural Laws,” Schrödinger pointed out the remarkable formal analogy of diffusion with quantum mechanics and the discrepancies introduced by the factor J=T. In his discussion Schrödinger made the statement, “I am unable to foresee whether this analogy will prove itself useful in the clarification of quantum mechanical concepts,” but he finished the paper with the hope it would. There is no indication that Schrödinger was aware of the possibilities of a next step into quantum Monte Carlo - the use of random walks to provide solutions to the wave equation. This was left for others to discover later.
Abstract We present an English translation of Erwin Schrödinger’s paper on “On the Reversal of the Laws of Nature‘’. In this paper, Schrödinger analyses the idea of time reversal of a diffusion process. Schrödinger’s paper acted as a prominent source of inspiration for the works of Bernstein on reciprocal processes and of Kolmogorov on time reversal properties of Markov processes and detailed balance. The ideas outlined by Schrödinger also inspired the development of probabilistic interpretations of quantum mechanics by Fényes, Nelson and others as well as the notion of “Euclidean Quantum Mechanics” as probabilistic analogue of quantization. In the second part of the paper, Schrödinger discusses the relation between time reversal and statistical laws of physics. We emphasize in our commentary the relevance of Schrödinger’s intuitions for contemporary developments in statistical nano-physics.
This is an exploration with today’s tools of probability theory into the mystery of ‘Über die Umkehrung der Naturgesetze’ (On time-reversal of natural laws) written by Erwin Schrödinger in 1931. He propagates the idea that diffusions given their marginal distributions at finite initial and final time are time-reversible. We are going to meet clouds of identical and independent particles considering them as realizations of diffusions. The particle dynamics is assumed to be known. Given the observation of such a cloud in terms of distribution densities at finite initial and final time, the intention is to find the ‘most probable’ distribution density of the cloud at intermediate times.
On 13 March 1926, the first of six papers on wave mechanics by Erwin Schrödinger was published in the Annalen der Physik with the title Quantisation as an eigenvalue problem (Part 1) (Schrödinger, 1926b). The startling first paragraph reads: ‘In this paper, I wish to consider, first, the simple case of the hydrogen atom (nonrelativistic and unperturbed), and show that the customary quantum conditions can be replaced by another postulate, in which the concept of “whole numbers”, merely as such, is not introduced. Rather, when integralness does appear, it arises in the same natural way as it does in the case of node-numbers of a vibrating string. The new conception is capable of generalisation, and strikes, I believe, very deeply at the true nature of quantum rules.’ These papers were the fruits of an extraordinary burst of creativity on Schrödinger's part which resulted from his interactions with Einstein in the latter part of 1925. Central to these exchanges were de Broglie's remarkable researches which culminated in his famous PhD dissertation and published papers of 1924. These events have already be recounted in Chap. 9. The subsequent developments which led to Schrödinger's discovery of the equation which bears his name will be taken up in Sect. 14.2, but let us first understand more about Schrödinger's background. Schrödinger's background in physics and mathematics Education and career up to 1925 Unlike Heisenberg, Jordan, Pauli and Dirac, Erwin Schrödinger was not one of the young Turks who developed Knabenphysik , young man's physics.
In the context of quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's equation has many possible interpretations, none of which appear to be entirely satisfactory. One reason for this is that there is no known microscopic model which yields both Schrödinger's equation and an accompanying ‘sensible’ interpretation. In contrast to this the diffusion equation is well known as a phenomenological equation obtainable from the microscopic model of Brownian motion. In this case the microscopic model provides an unambiguous interpretation of the partial differential equation. In this article we review work which shows that Schrödinger's equation by itself is also easily obtained from a lattice random walk version of the Brownian motion model. In this system, Schrödinger's equation arises by projection and the interpretation of wave functions is as direct and unambiguous as the interpretation of density in the diffusion case. However the direct interpretation is compatible with quantum mechanics only in a statistical sense in the context of ensembles of particles. This shows that measurement theory is the aspect of quantum theory which harbours the problems of interpretation, and we suggest the study of this and related systems to clearly illuminate the boundary between dynamics and measurement.
The connection between the Schrödinger equation and Einstein's diffusion theory based on the Brownian motion of independent particles is well known. However, in contrast to diffusion theory, quantum mechanics theory has suffered controversial interpretations due to the counterintuitive concept of wavefunction. Here, while we confirm there is no difference in the mathematical form of these two equations, we derive the imaginary version of displacement. Using the diffusion theory of particles in a medium, as simple as it is, we describe that quantum mechanics is just an elegant and subtle equation to describe the probability of all the trajectories that a particle can take to propagate in time by a predictive wavefunction. Therefore, information on the position of particles through time in quantum theory is embedded in the wavefunction, which predicts the evolution of an ensemble of individual Brownian particles.
Introduction. There exists a very comprehensive theory concerning the time development of probabilistic systems. This is the Theory of Stochastic processes (1). Quantum mechanics as described by the Schrödinger equation rests very heavily on probabilistic interpretation, and yet, after forty years of remarkably rapid advances and successes, it is not clear how it is related to stochastic theory. The formal similarity of certain aspects of, and equations used in these two theories are well known. The diffusion equation corresponds to the Schrödinger equation, a correspondence only marred by a square root of minus unity appearing with the time derivative in the latter equation. The Kolmogoroff–Chapman relation for probabilities in Brownian motion has an analogue (2) in quantum mechanics, not for probabilities though, but for the complex probability amplitudes. The uncertainty relation also has a stochastic analogue (3). Some of these analogous characteristics are actually symptomatic of the gulf which separates these two theories. There are solutions to the diffusion equation which have a very clear physical probabilistic meaning. This is not the case with the corresponding and formally similar solutions to the Schrödinger equation and is partly due to the √ − 1 mentioned earlier. The probabilistic interpretation of the solutions to the diffusion equation is direct and immediate. On the other hand, the probabilistic interpretation of the solutions, ψ of the Schrödinger equation involve the introduction of the probability density, p = ψ*ψ. One great difference between these two theories lies in their each having distinct principles of linear superposition. In Stochastic Theory probabilities are superposed and in quantum mechanics amplitudes or wave functions are superposed.