One-Particle Quantum Mechanics-General Formalism

Stephen L. Adler

Published Apr 27, 1995• 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract We begin the discussion of nonrelativistic quaternionic quantum mechanics by analyzing the allowed form of H for a single-particle system. We will assume, as is done in complex nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, that H is invariant under Galilean transformations and that the kinetic or noninteracting part of H is rotation and translation invariant. In analyzing the implications of these assumptions, we follow the method used in Sec. 13-4 of Jauch (1968a) in the complex quantum mechanics case [see also Mackey (1968), and Feynman as described in Dyson (1990)], and so work in the coordinate representation (cf. Sec. 2.4), and use the Heisenberg picture (cf. Sec. 3.3) to describe time evolution. For brevity of notation, we omit the subscript H for Heisenberg picture operators and denote the coordinate representation Hamiltonian H(x) as simply H2.

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195066432.003.0004

Related papers

Galilean relativity and the path integral formalism in quantum mechanics

Charles G Torre

Closed systems in Newtonian mechanics obey the principle of Galilean relativity. However, the usual Lagrangian for Newtonian mechanics, formed from the difference of kinetic and potential energies, is not invariant under the full group of Galilean transformations. In quantum mechanics, Galilean boosts require a non-trivial transformation rule for the wave function and a concomitant “projective representation” of the Galilean symmetry group. Using Feynman's path integral formalism, this latter result can be shown to be equivalent to the non-invariance of the Lagrangian. Thus, using path integral methods, the representation of certain symmetry groups in quantum mechanics can be simply understood in terms of the transformation properties of the classical Lagrangian and conversely. The main results reported here should be accessible to students and teachers of physics—particularly classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical physics—at the advanced undergraduate and beginning graduate levels, providing a useful exposition for those wanting to explore topics such as the path integral formalism for quantum mechanics, relativity principles, Lagrangian mechanics, and representations of symmetries in classical and quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2306.13487American Journal of PhysicsOct 23, 20230 citations

Communication Relations of Quantum Mechanics

Joseph V. Lepore

The mathematical and physical meaning of the commutation relations of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is discussed in terms of the representation of translations, Galilean transformations, and rotations of the coordinate system by unitary transformations acting on the unitary vector space of quantum states.

Physical ReviewJul 15, 19606 citations

Further General Results in Quaternionic Quantum Mechanics

Stephen L. Adler

Abstract We next discuss certain general results in quaternionic quantum mechanics, which can be formulated independently of the detailed structure of the Hamiltonian H Our emphasis in this chapter will be on topics connected with symmetry generators. We introduce quaternion anti-self-adjoint space translation generators and use them to construct the momentum representation. Corresponding to these generators, we introduce several possible definitions for the self adjoint momentum operators and show that none of them possesses all the properties of the momentum in complex quantum mechanics. A closely analogous discussion is given for the rotation generators and angular momentum.

Apr 27, 19950 citations

Imprimitivity theorem and quaternionic quantum mechanics

Piero Truini, Lawrence C. Biedenharn, Gianni Cassinelli

The study of quantum mechanics in quaternionic Hilbert space is not new in physics; indeed, it goes back to the first attempts in formulating quantum mechanics from an axiomatic point of view, and later, from a more physical viewpoint, to the survey of Finkelstein et al. But recently a new physical motivation for such investigations has been given by the work of Adler in algebraic chromostatics, since it has been pointed out that quaternionic quantum mechanics, as a model of an intrinsically non-Abelian gauge theory, fits the Adler algebraic version of chromostatics. The present paper aims at a critical understanding of quaternionic quantal structure through the examination of the elementary case of a single free particle in non-relativistic space-time. We follow the suggestion by Mackey to exploit the imprimitivity theorem, together with the notion of induced representation, in deriving the theory for the free particle system, starting from the axiomatic standpoint. We show that there exists a unique unitary skew adjoint operator which commutes with all the observables. This operator not only plays the role of the imaginary unit in the complex case, but allows a complexification of the Hilbert space by the choice of any quaternionic unit.

Hadronic J.; (United States)Jan 1, 19803 citations

Principle of General Q Covariance

David Finkelstein, J. M. Jauch, Samuel Schiminovich +1 more

In this paper the physical implications of quaternion quantum mechanics are further explored. In a quanternionic Hilbert space HQ, the lattice of subspaces has a symmetry group which is isomorphic to the group of all co-unitary transformations in HQ. In contrast to the complex space HC (ordinary Hilbert space), this group is connected, while for HC it consists of two disconnected pieces. The subgroup of transformations in HQ which associates with every quaternion q of magnitude 1, the correspondence ψ → qψq−1 for all ψ∈HQ (called Q conjugations), is isomorphic to the three-dimensional rotation group. We postulate the principle of Q covariance: The physical laws are invariant under Q conjugations. The full significance of this postulate is brought to light in localizable systems where it can be generalized to the principle of general Q covariance: Physical laws are invariant under general Q conjugations. Under the latter we understand conjugation transformations which vary continuously from point to point. The implementation of this principle forces us to construct a theory of parallel transport of quaternions. The notions of Q-covariant derivative and Q curvature are natural consequences thereof. There is a further new structure built into the quaternionic frame through the equations of motion. These equations single out a purely imaginary quaternion η(x) which may be a continuous function of the space—time coordinates. It corresponds to the i in the Schrödinger equation of ordinary quantum mechanics. We consider η(x) as a fundamental field, much like the tensor gμν in the general theory of relativity. We give here a classical theory of this field by assuming the simplest invariant Lagrangian which can be constructed out of η and the covariant Q connection. It is shown that this theory describes three vector fields, two of them with mass and charge, and one massless and neutral. The latter is identifiable with the classical electromagnetic field.

Journal of Mathematical PhysicsJun 1, 1963161 citations

Special Relativity, Lagrangian Theory and Quantum Mechanics

Francesco R. Ruggeri

Classical mechanics of a free particle is based on Newtonian mechanics and Lagrangian/Hamilton theories. A single frame of reference is chosen (the lab) and particles with the same mass mo (for example) moving at different velocities are considered in the free particle scenario (i.e in the absence of force (potentials)). We argue that the above is identical to considering a single particle with mass mo at time=to and x=0 viewed by various frames moving at different constant velocities -v. From the point of view of each frame, the particle moves at a velocity v. Thus the Newtonian picture of an mo particle moving at different speeds may be considered as a problem of special relativity. We argue (as in (1)) that (x,t)=(0,t) transforms to (x’,t’) such that x’/t’=v. If one uses a metric (1 0) (first row) (0 -1) second row, one may derive special relativistic relationships. In particular, one may obtain the Lorentz invariant -Et + px if (p,E) and (x,t) transform in the same manner. We argue that the relationships obtained from special relativity pertain to classical mechanics and so one may mathematically obtain a function L(v) such that p=dL/dv and E=pv - L for a free particle. In other words, special relativity governs Lagrangian results in the free particle case and is not really needed (in this special case). More importantly, it is special relativity which links E with t and p with x. As noted above, if one considers Netwonian mechanics in a single frame, the notion of special relativity does not arise, but the scaling of time by E and of x by p does i.e. A= -Et+px is the classical action both relativistically and nonrelativistically. It is just not written in this way usually (i.e. A = -mo t sqrt(1-vv) (c=1) relatiivstically and A =t .5mo vv nonrelativistically) We argued in (2) that scaling must manifest itself physically and that it accounts for the physical wavelength in quantum mechanics. We argue that the quantum mechanics of a free particle ultimately follows from special relativity. As a result, ideas of quantum mechanics would not have appeared in Newtonian mechanics nor Lagrangian or Hamiltonian theories. When special relativity was developed it focused on transformations related to different frames, but these are equivalent to describing one frame with many different velocities (same mo). Thus the physics in one frame is governed by special relativity even if it is nonrelativistic. We argue that the notion of the wavelength which appears even in the Schrodinger formalism follows from scaling of x by p which ultimately originates from special relativity. In other words, both the Lagrangian formalism and quantum mechanics follow from special relativity in the free particle case. We argue that free particle quantum mechanics is the starting point of overall quantum mechanics.

Jul 21, 20220 citations