Abstract In the third and last part of this book we concentrate on renormalization group (or RG) in its various forms. As the great success of RG has been in the context of critical phenomena, it seems sensible to consider the general theoretical situation in that subject as it existed just prior to the coming of RG. Moreover, as the application of RG to critical phenomena was to some extent inspired by the concepts of scaling and “blocking the lattice,” it will be helpful to examine these ideas also.
Abstract In the third and last part of this book we concentrate on renormalization group (or RG) in its various forms. As the great success of RG has been in the context of critical phenomena, it seems sensible to consider the general theoretical situation in that subject as it existed just prior to the coming of RG. Moreover, as the application of RG to critical phenomena was to some extent inspired by the concepts of scaling and “blocking the lattice,” it will be helpful to examine these ideas also.
The renormalization-group (RG) method discussed in this chapter has assumed a pivotal role in the modern theory of critical phenomena. It attempts to relate the partition function of a given system to that of a “similar system” with decreased degrees of freedom through a process referred to as renormalization. Exactly how these degrees of freedom are removed from the system, what we mean by a “similar” system, and how successive systems are coupled to one another are essentially the questions we take up in the introductory treatment given in this chapter. The RG method is a topic with large scope and found widely disseminated in an extensive physics literature on the topic; however, it is seldom found in engineering journals. Our purpose here is to try and make sense of some basic ideas with the RG approach so that it is more accessible to this wider community. For this we often rely upon some prior exposes of the subject in more specialized settings [1, 2, 3, 5]. In its complete sense, the RG method has only been made to work, at least analytically, for a few simple statistical-mechanical models. But aside from these numerical results, many important and quite general insights about critical phenomena can be developed from studying this approach to the problem, especially the central role played by length scale as a factor in describing the phenomenology. These ideas have significantly enhanced our understanding of ideas like scale invariance, universality classes, relevant scaling fields (as opposed to irrelevant ones), Hamiltonian renormalization, and so on; these and related concepts lie at the center of modern discourse on the subject. The essential concepts of the approach can be well illustrated using the Ising system since, with this model, lattice spins are fixed in space, which makes the analytical work quite transparent. This approach, called real space renormalization, is the RG method studied in this chapter.
As discussed in the previous chapter, the phenomenological theory of critical phenomena finds a sound basis in the logical sequence of universality, scaling, relevant and irrelevant variables. The difficult problem of a large number of degrees of freedom strongly correlated within the coherence distance, which diverges at criticality, is thereby, in principle, reduced to the determination of the homogeneous form of the relevant response functions and of the evaluation of a few critical indices related to the relevant parameters, whereas the details specifying each system do not matter. In order to give a microscopic foundation to universality and to the scaling theory, an exact transformation is needed, which changes into a scaling transformation asymptotically near the critical point. This is the renormalization group (RG) approach, recently presented in a huge number of reviewpapers and books.Historically, the first comprehensive overview was given by the sixth volume of the series edited by Domb and Green (1976) and by the classic books by Patashinskij and Pokrovskij (1979) and by Ma (1976). Along with scaling theory, the field-theoretic renormalization group (RG) approach (Gell- Mann and Low (1954); Bogoliubov and Shirkov (1959); Bonch-Bruevich and Tyablikov (1962)) was introduced in critical phenomena (Di Castro and Jona-Lasinio (1969)) by showing how the RG equations generalize the universality relations in the sense that they relate one model system to another by varying the coupling and suitably rescaling the other variables and the correlation functions. At the same time a detailed analysis of the pertubative diagrammatic structure of the correlation functions together with the use of Ward identities yielded a renormalized theory (Migdal (1969); Polyakov (1968, 1969)). By iterating the RG transformation the coupling disappears from the equations near to the critical point, the homogeneous form of the static order-parameter correlation function is obtained and a microscopic definition of the critical indices is given. The scaling picture then acquires a theoretical basis. Wilson (Wilson (1971a, b); Wilson and Kogut (1974)) gave a great contribution to the understanding of the physics underlying the RG procedure and to the explicit calculation of the critical indices. He proposed a simple mathematical realization of the other very physical idea of universality due to Kadanoff of grouping together degrees of freedom on the scale s associated with larger and larger cells.
If we study the history of science we see produced two phenomena which are, so to speak, each the inverse of the other. Sometimes it is simplicity which is hidden under what is apparently complex; sometimes, on the contrary, it is simplicity which is apparent, and which conceals extremely complex realities. Henri Poincaré Devoting only a short chapter to the renormalization group (RG) is a challenge owing to the wealth of both fundamental concepts and computational tools associated with this term. The RG is indeed encountered in many different domains of theoretical physics, ranging from quantum electrodynamics to second-order phase transitions to fractal growth and diffusion processes – one should rather speak of renormalization group S ! We refer to Brown (1993) and Fisher (1998) for an historical account, to Goldenfeld (1992) and Lesne (1998) and references therein for an overview of the domains of application and variants of RGs. We here emphasize that the RG is a way, maybe the most successful and with no doubt the most systematic and constructive, to derive effective low-dimensional descriptions that capture large-scale and/or long-time behavior . The RG can be extended far beyond the specific scope of critical phenomena, to an iterated multiscale approach allowing the construction of robust and minimal macroscopic models describing the universal large-scale features and asymptotics of a complex system. This generalized viewpoint brings out the close logical and even technical connections that bridge, within a unified framework, perturbative RG for singular series expansions, spin-block RG and momentum-shell RG for critical phenomena, RG for the asymptotic analysis of differential and partial differential equations, and probabilistic RG for the derivation of statistical laws and limit theorems.
In this chapter the basic concepts of the modern approach to equilibrium critical behaviour, conventionally grouped under the title ‘renormalization group’, are introduced. This terminology is rather unfortunate. The mathematical structure of the procedure, in the sense that it may be said to have any rigorous underpinnings, is certainly not that of a group. Neither is renormalization in quantum field theory an essential element, although it has an intimate connection with some formulations of the renormalization group. In fact, the renormalization group framework may be applied to problems quite unrelated to field theory. The origins of the name may be traced to the particle physics of the 1960s, when it was optimistically hoped that everything in fundamental physics might be explained in terms of symmetries and group theory, rather than dynamics. One of the earliest applications of renormalization group ideas, in fact, was to the rather esoteric subject of the high energy behaviour of renormalized quantum electrodynamics. It took the vision of K. Wilson to realise that these methods had a far wider field of application in the scaling theory of critical phenomena that was being formulated by Fisher, Kadanoff and others in the latter part of the decade. By then, however, the name had become firmly attached to the subject. Not only are the words ‘renormalization’ and ‘group’ examples of unfortunate terminology, the use of the definite article ‘the’ which usually precedes them is even more confusing.
This book provides an elementary introduction to the notions of continuum limit and universality in statistical systems with a large number of degrees of freedom. The existence of a continuum limit requires the appearance of correlations at large distance, a situation that is encountered in second order phase transitions, near the critical temperature. In this context, the book emphasizes the role of gaussian distributions and their relations with the mean field approximation and Landau′s theory of critical phenomena. The book shows that quasi-gaussian or mean-field approximations cannot describe correctly phase transitions in three space dimensions. The book assigns this difficulty to the coupling of very different physical length scales, even though the systems we will consider have only local, that is, short range, interactions. To analyze the unusual situation, a new concept is required: the renormalization group, whose fixed points allow understanding the universality of physical properties at large distance, beyond mean-field theory. In the continuum limit, critical phenomena can be described by quantum field theories. In this framework, the renormalization group is directly related to the renormalization process; that is, the necessity to cancel the infinities that arise in straightforward formulations of the theory. The book discusses the renormalization group in the context of various relevant field theories. This leads to proofs of universality and to efficient tools for calculating universal quantities in a perturbative framework. Finally, the book constructs a general functional renormalization group, which can be used when perturbative methods are inadequate.