In this chapter the basic concepts of the modern approach to equilibrium critical behaviour, conventionally grouped under the title ‘renormalization group’, are introduced. This terminology is rather unfortunate. The mathematical structure of the procedure, in the sense that it may be said to have any rigorous underpinnings, is certainly not that of a group. Neither is renormalization in quantum field theory an essential element, although it has an intimate connection with some formulations of the renormalization group. In fact, the renormalization group framework may be applied to problems quite unrelated to field theory. The origins of the name may be traced to the particle physics of the 1960s, when it was optimistically hoped that everything in fundamental physics might be explained in terms of symmetries and group theory, rather than dynamics. One of the earliest applications of renormalization group ideas, in fact, was to the rather esoteric subject of the high energy behaviour of renormalized quantum electrodynamics. It took the vision of K. Wilson to realise that these methods had a far wider field of application in the scaling theory of critical phenomena that was being formulated by Fisher, Kadanoff and others in the latter part of the decade. By then, however, the name had become firmly attached to the subject. Not only are the words ‘renormalization’ and ‘group’ examples of unfortunate terminology, the use of the definite article ‘the’ which usually precedes them is even more confusing.
In this chapter the basic concepts of the modern approach to equilibrium critical behaviour, conventionally grouped under the title ‘renormalization group’, are introduced. This terminology is rather unfortunate. The mathematical structure of the procedure, in the sense that it may be said to have any rigorous underpinnings, is certainly not that of a group. Neither is renormalization in quantum field theory an essential element, although it has an intimate connection with some formulations of the renormalization group. In fact, the renormalization group framework may be applied to problems quite unrelated to field theory. The origins of the name may be traced to the particle physics of the 1960s, when it was optimistically hoped that everything in fundamental physics might be explained in terms of symmetries and group theory, rather than dynamics. One of the earliest applications of renormalization group ideas, in fact, was to the rather esoteric subject of the high energy behaviour of renormalized quantum electrodynamics. It took the vision of K. Wilson to realise that these methods had a far wider field of application in the scaling theory of critical phenomena that was being formulated by Fisher, Kadanoff and others in the latter part of the decade. By then, however, the name had become firmly attached to the subject. Not only are the words ‘renormalization’ and ‘group’ examples of unfortunate terminology, the use of the definite article ‘the’ which usually precedes them is even more confusing.
The renormalization-group (RG) method discussed in this chapter has assumed a pivotal role in the modern theory of critical phenomena. It attempts to relate the partition function of a given system to that of a “similar system” with decreased degrees of freedom through a process referred to as renormalization. Exactly how these degrees of freedom are removed from the system, what we mean by a “similar” system, and how successive systems are coupled to one another are essentially the questions we take up in the introductory treatment given in this chapter. The RG method is a topic with large scope and found widely disseminated in an extensive physics literature on the topic; however, it is seldom found in engineering journals. Our purpose here is to try and make sense of some basic ideas with the RG approach so that it is more accessible to this wider community. For this we often rely upon some prior exposes of the subject in more specialized settings [1, 2, 3, 5]. In its complete sense, the RG method has only been made to work, at least analytically, for a few simple statistical-mechanical models. But aside from these numerical results, many important and quite general insights about critical phenomena can be developed from studying this approach to the problem, especially the central role played by length scale as a factor in describing the phenomenology. These ideas have significantly enhanced our understanding of ideas like scale invariance, universality classes, relevant scaling fields (as opposed to irrelevant ones), Hamiltonian renormalization, and so on; these and related concepts lie at the center of modern discourse on the subject. The essential concepts of the approach can be well illustrated using the Ising system since, with this model, lattice spins are fixed in space, which makes the analytical work quite transparent. This approach, called real space renormalization, is the RG method studied in this chapter.
Abstract Chapter 5 first recalls the importance of the concept of scale decoupling in physics. It then emphasizes that quantum field theory and the theory of critical phenomena have provided two examples where this concepts fails. To deal with such a situation, a new tool has been invented: the renormalization group. In the framework of effective quantum field theory, a perturbative renormalization group has been formulated. Its implementation has led to the discovery of fixed points as zeros of beta functions, and calculations of critical exponents of a class of macroscopic phase transitions in the form of Wilson–Fisher epsilon or fixed dimension expansions. These expansions being divergent, they could summed by methods based on the Borel transformation and the determination of the large order behaviour of perturbation theory.
The primary goal of modern theories of critical phenomena is the evaluation of critical exponents from first principles, implying the need to get beyond mean field theories which predict the same exponents independent of the nature of the system. This chapter focuses on a new approach emerged in the 1960s based on two ideas—scaling and renormalization. It presents the physical picture developed by L. P. Kadanoff that provides a conceptual basis for scaling and which has become part of the standard language of critical phenomena. Renormalization provides a way to calculate the free energy not involving a direct evaluation of the partition function—it's a new paradigm in statistical mechanics. The chapter analyzes a simplified, approximate set of recursion relations valid at high temperature for a model with nearest and next-nearest-neighbor interactions. In 1971 K. G. Wilson published two articles marking the introduction of the renormalization group to the study of critical phenomena.
The basic idea of the renormalization group is introduced and illustrative examples are presented. Emphasis is put on the application to the theory of critical phenomena. This article is prepared for pedagogical purposes. It is written at a level that a second-year graduate student in physical sciences can understand. No previous knowledge of critical phenomena or field theory is needed. We make no attempt to survey the field or cover a wide range of subjects. On the contrary, we limit the scope to the most basic aspects. We choose to elaborate at length to make the basic idea clear and the definitions precise, and to go through the examples very carefully. We feel that once these basic aspect are understood, there will be no difficulty in confronting the rapidly expanding literature on this subject.
This special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General is a collection of articles dealing with the application of renormalization group methods to a wide range of problems in physics. Most articles are based on contributions presented at the 6th International Conference, Renormalization Group 2005 (RG 2005), held at the University of Helsinki from 30 August to 3--September 2005. This was the sixth of a series of conferences on this topic, the first three of which took place in 1986, 1991 and 1996 at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia. The fourth (RG99) was held in 1999 in Taxco, Mexico, and the fifth (RG02) in 2002 in Tatranska Strba, Slovakia. During the second half of the 20th century a number of important and very successful new paradigms such as scale-dependent (`running') coupling constants, scaling, and universality became firmly established in physics. To a large extent, these advances were due to the development of renormalization group ideas and their successful implementation as powerful calculational schemes to tackle problems with many length scales. While the concept of the renormalization group had originally been introduced in elementary particle physics, its modern form eventually emerged from the study of problems in condensed matter physics, such as critical phenomena and the Kondo effect. This in turn has significantly reshaped our understanding of field theories in high energy physics, and produced powerful computational tools for dealing with difficult many-length-scale problems in distinct fields of physics, ranging from elementary particle and condensed matter physics to hydrodynamic turbulence and growth phenomena in nonequilibrium physics. The history of the renormalization group, characterized by frequent exchanges of ideas between elementary particle and condensed matter physics, bears testimony to the enormous benefits to which such exchanges can lead. The main aim of the series of renormalization group conferences has been to bring together scientists with backgrounds and expertise in the application of the renormalization group to problems in broadly different areas of physics, offering regular events for continuing such fruiful exchanges of ideas. We hope that the present collection of contributions to quantum field theory, mathematical and methodological aspects of the renormalization group, statistical mechanics, condensed matter physics, and stochastic dynamics conveys this spirit. We feel it amply demonstrates the breadth of activity of research based on the renormalization group and its potential for future work. On behalf of the organizers of the conference, we would like to thank the sixty participants of the conference and the members of the Advisory Board for their contributions. Financial and organizational support of the University of Helsinki, the Academy of Finland, the Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters and the Naval Academy is gratefully acknowledged. We are very grateful to all authors who contributed to this special issue. Finally, we owe special thanks to all who assisted in the preparation of it, in particular to the staff of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General .
As discussed in the previous chapter, the phenomenological theory of critical phenomena finds a sound basis in the logical sequence of universality, scaling, relevant and irrelevant variables. The difficult problem of a large number of degrees of freedom strongly correlated within the coherence distance, which diverges at criticality, is thereby, in principle, reduced to the determination of the homogeneous form of the relevant response functions and of the evaluation of a few critical indices related to the relevant parameters, whereas the details specifying each system do not matter. In order to give a microscopic foundation to universality and to the scaling theory, an exact transformation is needed, which changes into a scaling transformation asymptotically near the critical point. This is the renormalization group (RG) approach, recently presented in a huge number of reviewpapers and books.Historically, the first comprehensive overview was given by the sixth volume of the series edited by Domb and Green (1976) and by the classic books by Patashinskij and Pokrovskij (1979) and by Ma (1976). Along with scaling theory, the field-theoretic renormalization group (RG) approach (Gell- Mann and Low (1954); Bogoliubov and Shirkov (1959); Bonch-Bruevich and Tyablikov (1962)) was introduced in critical phenomena (Di Castro and Jona-Lasinio (1969)) by showing how the RG equations generalize the universality relations in the sense that they relate one model system to another by varying the coupling and suitably rescaling the other variables and the correlation functions. At the same time a detailed analysis of the pertubative diagrammatic structure of the correlation functions together with the use of Ward identities yielded a renormalized theory (Migdal (1969); Polyakov (1968, 1969)). By iterating the RG transformation the coupling disappears from the equations near to the critical point, the homogeneous form of the static order-parameter correlation function is obtained and a microscopic definition of the critical indices is given. The scaling picture then acquires a theoretical basis. Wilson (Wilson (1971a, b); Wilson and Kogut (1974)) gave a great contribution to the understanding of the physics underlying the RG procedure and to the explicit calculation of the critical indices. He proposed a simple mathematical realization of the other very physical idea of universality due to Kadanoff of grouping together degrees of freedom on the scale s associated with larger and larger cells.