Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Renormalization Group 2005

Hans Werner Diehl, Juha Honkonen, Dmitri Igorevich Kazakov

Published Jun 7, 2006• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General is a collection of articles dealing with the application of renormalization group methods to a wide range of problems in physics. Most articles are based on contributions presented at the 6th International Conference, Renormalization Group 2005 (RG 2005), held at the University of Helsinki from 30 August to 3--September 2005. This was the sixth of a series of conferences on this topic, the first three of which took place in 1986, 1991 and 1996 at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia. The fourth (RG99) was held in 1999 in Taxco, Mexico, and the fifth (RG02) in 2002 in Tatranska Strba, Slovakia. During the second half of the 20th century a number of important and very successful new paradigms such as scale-dependent (`running') coupling constants, scaling, and universality became firmly established in physics. To a large extent, these advances were due to the development of renormalization group ideas and their successful implementation as powerful calculational schemes to tackle problems with many length scales. While the concept of the renormalization group had originally been introduced in elementary particle physics, its modern form eventually emerged from the study of problems in condensed matter physics, such as critical phenomena and the Kondo effect. This in turn has significantly reshaped our understanding of field theories in high energy physics, and produced powerful computational tools for dealing with difficult many-length-scale problems in distinct fields of physics, ranging from elementary particle and condensed matter physics to hydrodynamic turbulence and growth phenomena in nonequilibrium physics. The history of the renormalization group, characterized by frequent exchanges of ideas between elementary particle and condensed matter physics, bears testimony to the enormous benefits to which such exchanges can lead. The main aim of the series of renormalization group conferences has been to bring together scientists with backgrounds and expertise in the application of the renormalization group to problems in broadly different areas of physics, offering regular events for continuing such fruiful exchanges of ideas. We hope that the present collection of contributions to quantum field theory, mathematical and methodological aspects of the renormalization group, statistical mechanics, condensed matter physics, and stochastic dynamics conveys this spirit. We feel it amply demonstrates the breadth of activity of research based on the renormalization group and its potential for future work. On behalf of the organizers of the conference, we would like to thank the sixty participants of the conference and the members of the Advisory Board for their contributions. Financial and organizational support of the University of Helsinki, the Academy of Finland, the Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters and the Naval Academy is gratefully acknowledged. We are very grateful to all authors who contributed to this special issue. Finally, we owe special thanks to all who assisted in the preparation of it, in particular to the staff of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General .

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/39/25/e01

Related papers

Renormalization Methods---A Guide For Beginners

John Cardy

The stated goal of this book is to fill a perceived gap between undergraduate texts on critical phenomena and advanced texts on quantum field theory, in the general area of renormalization methods. It is debatable whether this gap really exists nowadays, as a number of books have appeared in which it is made clear that field-theoretic renormalization group methods are not the preserve of particle theory, and indeed are far more easily appreciated in the contexts of statistical and condensed matter physics. Nevertheless, this volume does have a fresh aspect to it, perhaps because of the author's background in fluid dynamics and turbulence theory, rather than through the more traditional migration from particle physics. The book begins at a very elementary level, in an effort to motivate the use of renormalization methods. This is a worthy effort, but it is likely that most of this section will be thought too elementary by readers wanting to get their teeth into the subject, while those for whom this section is apparently written are likely to find the later chapters rather challenging. The author's particular approach then leads him to emphasise the role of renormalized perturbation theory (rather than the renormalization group) in a number of problems, including non-linear systems and turbulence. Some of these ideas will be novel and perhaps even surprising to traditionally trained field theorists. Most of the rest of the book is on far more familiar territory: the momentum-space renormalization group, epsilon-expansion, and so on. This is standard stuff, and, like many other textbooks, it takes a considerable chunk of the book to explain all the formalism. As a result, there is only space to discuss the standard ϕ 4 field theory as applied to the Ising model (even the N -vector model is not covered) so that no impression is conveyed of the power and extent of all the applications and generalizations of the techniques. It is regrettable that so much space is spent on rather oversimplified and unrelated models in the first part of the book that, in the end, the reader is left breathless on the threshold of the really interesting material. Despite the earlier emphasis on the application of renormalization ideas in dynamics, in the end the full power of the field-theoretical approach is not applied to the obvious arena of dynamic critical phenomena (where there certainly is currently a gap in the literature) but to the Navier--Stokes equations. The development of the book is somewhat illogical in places. Mean field theory interrupts discussion of block spin methods and scaling arguments---the two are distinct approaches. The Callan--Symanzik equation is introduced before Feynman diagrams are explained, so that there is a hiatus before the actual results for the critical exponents can be found. I think this book is too broad in some respects, and too limited in others, to be a really useful textbook for a course on renormalization methods. Those who have learned these ideas either from field theory, or from nonlinear systems, will find it more rewarding for the sections covering the topics with which they are less familiar. For this reason alone, the book should at least find a place on most library reference shelves.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Apr 28, 2004•79 citations

New applications of the renormalization group method in physics: a brief introduction

B Y Y. M Eurice, R. P Erry

The renormalization group (RG) method developed by Ken Wilson more than four decades ago has revolutionized the way we think about problems involving a broad range of energy scales such as phase transitions, turbulence, continuum limits and bifurcations in dynamical systems. The Theme Issue provides articles reviewing recent progress made using the RG method in atomic, condensed matter, nuclear and particle physics. In the following, we introduce these articles in a way that emphasizes common themes and the universal aspects of the method.

•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

New applications of the renormalization group method in physics: a brief introduction

Yannick Meurice, Robert J. Perry, Shan-Wen Tsai

The renormalization group (RG) method developed by Ken Wilson more than four decades ago has revolutionized the way we think about problems involving a broad range of energy scales such as phase transitions, turbulence, continuum limits and bifurcations in dynamical systems. The Theme Issue provides articles reviewing recent progress made using the RG method in atomic, condensed matter, nuclear and particle physics. In the following, we introduce these articles in a way that emphasizes common themes and the universal aspects of the method.

arXiv:1102.5717•Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Jun 6, 2011•13 citations

The Renormalization-Group Method

Eldred H. Chimowitz

The renormalization-group (RG) method discussed in this chapter has assumed a pivotal role in the modern theory of critical phenomena. It attempts to relate the partition function of a given system to that of a “similar system” with decreased degrees of freedom through a process referred to as renormalization. Exactly how these degrees of freedom are removed from the system, what we mean by a “similar” system, and how successive systems are coupled to one another are essentially the questions we take up in the introductory treatment given in this chapter. The RG method is a topic with large scope and found widely disseminated in an extensive physics literature on the topic; however, it is seldom found in engineering journals. Our purpose here is to try and make sense of some basic ideas with the RG approach so that it is more accessible to this wider community. For this we often rely upon some prior exposes of the subject in more specialized settings [1, 2, 3, 5]. In its complete sense, the RG method has only been made to work, at least analytically, for a few simple statistical-mechanical models. But aside from these numerical results, many important and quite general insights about critical phenomena can be developed from studying this approach to the problem, especially the central role played by length scale as a factor in describing the phenomenology. These ideas have significantly enhanced our understanding of ideas like scale invariance, universality classes, relevant scaling fields (as opposed to irrelevant ones), Hamiltonian renormalization, and so on; these and related concepts lie at the center of modern discourse on the subject. The essential concepts of the approach can be well illustrated using the Ising system since, with this model, lattice spins are fixed in space, which makes the analytical work quite transparent. This approach, called real space renormalization, is the RG method studied in this chapter.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Jun 23, 2005•0 citations

The renormalization group approach

C. Di Castro, Roberto Raimondi

As discussed in the previous chapter, the phenomenological theory of critical phenomena finds a sound basis in the logical sequence of universality, scaling, relevant and irrelevant variables. The difficult problem of a large number of degrees of freedom strongly correlated within the coherence distance, which diverges at criticality, is thereby, in principle, reduced to the determination of the homogeneous form of the relevant response functions and of the evaluation of a few critical indices related to the relevant parameters, whereas the details specifying each system do not matter. In order to give a microscopic foundation to universality and to the scaling theory, an exact transformation is needed, which changes into a scaling transformation asymptotically near the critical point. This is the renormalization group (RG) approach, recently presented in a huge number of reviewpapers and books.Historically, the first comprehensive overview was given by the sixth volume of the series edited by Domb and Green (1976) and by the classic books by Patashinskij and Pokrovskij (1979) and by Ma (1976). Along with scaling theory, the field-theoretic renormalization group (RG) approach (Gell- Mann and Low (1954); Bogoliubov and Shirkov (1959); Bonch-Bruevich and Tyablikov (1962)) was introduced in critical phenomena (Di Castro and Jona-Lasinio (1969)) by showing how the RG equations generalize the universality relations in the sense that they relate one model system to another by varying the coupling and suitably rescaling the other variables and the correlation functions. At the same time a detailed analysis of the pertubative diagrammatic structure of the correlation functions together with the use of Ward identities yielded a renormalized theory (Migdal (1969); Polyakov (1968, 1969)). By iterating the RG transformation the coupling disappears from the equations near to the critical point, the homogeneous form of the static order-parameter correlation function is obtained and a microscopic definition of the critical indices is given. The scaling picture then acquires a theoretical basis. Wilson (Wilson (1971a, b); Wilson and Kogut (1974)) gave a great contribution to the understanding of the physics underlying the RG procedure and to the explicit calculation of the critical indices. He proposed a simple mathematical realization of the other very physical idea of universality due to Kadanoff of grouping together degrees of freedom on the scale s associated with larger and larger cells.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 27, 2015•0 citations

Renormalization-group approaches

Patrizia Castiglione, M. Falcioni, Annick Lesne +1 more

If we study the history of science we see produced two phenomena which are, so to speak, each the inverse of the other. Sometimes it is simplicity which is hidden under what is apparently complex; sometimes, on the contrary, it is simplicity which is apparent, and which conceals extremely complex realities. Henri Poincaré Devoting only a short chapter to the renormalization group (RG) is a challenge owing to the wealth of both fundamental concepts and computational tools associated with this term. The RG is indeed encountered in many different domains of theoretical physics, ranging from quantum electrodynamics to second-order phase transitions to fractal growth and diffusion processes – one should rather speak of renormalization group S ! We refer to Brown (1993) and Fisher (1998) for an historical account, to Goldenfeld (1992) and Lesne (1998) and references therein for an overview of the domains of application and variants of RGs. We here emphasize that the RG is a way, maybe the most successful and with no doubt the most systematic and constructive, to derive effective low-dimensional descriptions that capture large-scale and/or long-time behavior . The RG can be extended far beyond the specific scope of critical phenomena, to an iterated multiscale approach allowing the construction of robust and minimal macroscopic models describing the universal large-scale features and asymptotics of a complex system. This generalized viewpoint brings out the close logical and even technical connections that bridge, within a unified framework, perturbative RG for singular series expansions, spin-block RG and momentum-shell RG for critical phenomena, RG for the asymptotic analysis of differential and partial differential equations, and probabilistic RG for the derivation of statistical laws and limit theorems.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 21, 2008•0 citations
This special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General is a collection of articles dealing with the application of renormalization group methods to a wide range of problems in physics. Most articles are based on contributions presented at the 6th International Conference, Renormalization Group 2005 (RG 2005), held at the University of Helsinki from 30 August to 3--September 2005. This was the sixth of a series of conferences on this topic, the first three of which took place in 1986, 1991 and 1996 at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia. The fourth (RG99) was held in 1999 in Taxco, Mexico, and the fifth (RG02) in 2002 in Tatranska Strba, Slovakia. During the second half of the 20th century a number of important and very successful new paradigms such as scale-dependent (`running') coupling constants, scaling, and universality became firmly established in physics. To a large extent, these advances were due to the development of renormalization group ideas and their successful implementation as powerful calculational schemes to tackle problems with many length scales. While the concept of the renormalization group had originally been introduced in elementary particle physics, its modern form eventually emerged from the study of problems in condensed matter physics, such as critical phenomena and the Kondo effect. This in turn has significantly reshaped our understanding of field theories in high energy physics, and produced powerful computational tools for dealing with difficult many-length-scale problems in distinct fields of physics, ranging from elementary particle and condensed matter physics to hydrodynamic turbulence and growth phenomena in nonequilibrium physics. The history of the renormalization group, characterized by frequent exchanges of ideas between elementary particle and condensed matter physics, bears testimony to the enormous benefits to which such exchanges can lead. The main aim of the series of renormalization group conferences has been to bring together scientists with backgrounds and expertise in the application of the renormalization group to problems in broadly different areas of physics, offering regular events for continuing such fruiful exchanges of ideas. We hope that the present collection of contributions to quantum field theory, mathematical and methodological aspects of the renormalization group, statistical mechanics, condensed matter physics, and stochastic dynamics conveys this spirit. We feel it amply demonstrates the breadth of activity of research based on the renormalization group and its potential for future work. On behalf of the organizers of the conference, we would like to thank the sixty participants of the conference and the members of the Advisory Board for their contributions. Financial and organizational support of the University of Helsinki, the Academy of Finland, the Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters and the Naval Academy is gratefully acknowledged. We are very grateful to all authors who contributed to this special issue. Finally, we owe special thanks to all who assisted in the preparation of it, in particular to the staff of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General .
The stated goal of this book is to fill a perceived gap between undergraduate texts on critical phenomena and advanced texts on quantum field theory, in the general area of renormalization methods. It is debatable whether this gap really exists nowadays, as a number of books have appeared in which it is made clear that field-theoretic renormalization group methods are not the preserve of particle theory, and indeed are far more easily appreciated in the contexts of statistical and condensed matter physics. Nevertheless, this volume does have a fresh aspect to it, perhaps because of the author's background in fluid dynamics and turbulence theory, rather than through the more traditional migration from particle physics. The book begins at a very elementary level, in an effort to motivate the use of renormalization methods. This is a worthy effort, but it is likely that most of this section will be thought too elementary by readers wanting to get their teeth into the subject, while those for whom this section is apparently written are likely to find the later chapters rather challenging. The author's particular approach then leads him to emphasise the role of renormalized perturbation theory (rather than the renormalization group) in a number of problems, including non-linear systems and turbulence. Some of these ideas will be novel and perhaps even surprising to traditionally trained field theorists. Most of the rest of the book is on far more familiar territory: the momentum-space renormalization group, epsilon-expansion, and so on. This is standard stuff, and, like many other textbooks, it takes a considerable chunk of the book to explain all the formalism. As a result, there is only space to discuss the standard ϕ 4 field theory as applied to the Ising model (even the N -vector model is not covered) so that no impression is conveyed of the power and extent of all the applications and generalizations of the techniques. It is regrettable that so much space is spent on rather oversimplified and unrelated models in the first part of the book that, in the end, the reader is left breathless on the threshold of the really interesting material. Despite the earlier emphasis on the application of renormalization ideas in dynamics, in the end the full power of the field-theoretical approach is not applied to the obvious arena of dynamic critical phenomena (where there certainly is currently a gap in the literature) but to the Navier--Stokes equations. The development of the book is somewhat illogical in places. Mean field theory interrupts discussion of block spin methods and scaling arguments---the two are distinct approaches. The Callan--Symanzik equation is introduced before Feynman diagrams are explained, so that there is a hiatus before the actual results for the critical exponents can be found. I think this book is too broad in some respects, and too limited in others, to be a really useful textbook for a course on renormalization methods. Those who have learned these ideas either from field theory, or from nonlinear systems, will find it more rewarding for the sections covering the topics with which they are less familiar. For this reason alone, the book should at least find a place on most library reference shelves.
The renormalization group (RG) method developed by Ken Wilson more than four decades ago has revolutionized the way we think about problems involving a broad range of energy scales such as phase transitions, turbulence, continuum limits and bifurcations in dynamical systems. The Theme Issue provides articles reviewing recent progress made using the RG method in atomic, condensed matter, nuclear and particle physics. In the following, we introduce these articles in a way that emphasizes common themes and the universal aspects of the method.
The renormalization group (RG) method developed by Ken Wilson more than four decades ago has revolutionized the way we think about problems involving a broad range of energy scales such as phase transitions, turbulence, continuum limits and bifurcations in dynamical systems. The Theme Issue provides articles reviewing recent progress made using the RG method in atomic, condensed matter, nuclear and particle physics. In the following, we introduce these articles in a way that emphasizes common themes and the universal aspects of the method.
The renormalization-group (RG) method discussed in this chapter has assumed a pivotal role in the modern theory of critical phenomena. It attempts to relate the partition function of a given system to that of a “similar system” with decreased degrees of freedom through a process referred to as renormalization. Exactly how these degrees of freedom are removed from the system, what we mean by a “similar” system, and how successive systems are coupled to one another are essentially the questions we take up in the introductory treatment given in this chapter. The RG method is a topic with large scope and found widely disseminated in an extensive physics literature on the topic; however, it is seldom found in engineering journals. Our purpose here is to try and make sense of some basic ideas with the RG approach so that it is more accessible to this wider community. For this we often rely upon some prior exposes of the subject in more specialized settings [1, 2, 3, 5]. In its complete sense, the RG method has only been made to work, at least analytically, for a few simple statistical-mechanical models. But aside from these numerical results, many important and quite general insights about critical phenomena can be developed from studying this approach to the problem, especially the central role played by length scale as a factor in describing the phenomenology. These ideas have significantly enhanced our understanding of ideas like scale invariance, universality classes, relevant scaling fields (as opposed to irrelevant ones), Hamiltonian renormalization, and so on; these and related concepts lie at the center of modern discourse on the subject. The essential concepts of the approach can be well illustrated using the Ising system since, with this model, lattice spins are fixed in space, which makes the analytical work quite transparent. This approach, called real space renormalization, is the RG method studied in this chapter.
As discussed in the previous chapter, the phenomenological theory of critical phenomena finds a sound basis in the logical sequence of universality, scaling, relevant and irrelevant variables. The difficult problem of a large number of degrees of freedom strongly correlated within the coherence distance, which diverges at criticality, is thereby, in principle, reduced to the determination of the homogeneous form of the relevant response functions and of the evaluation of a few critical indices related to the relevant parameters, whereas the details specifying each system do not matter. In order to give a microscopic foundation to universality and to the scaling theory, an exact transformation is needed, which changes into a scaling transformation asymptotically near the critical point. This is the renormalization group (RG) approach, recently presented in a huge number of reviewpapers and books.Historically, the first comprehensive overview was given by the sixth volume of the series edited by Domb and Green (1976) and by the classic books by Patashinskij and Pokrovskij (1979) and by Ma (1976). Along with scaling theory, the field-theoretic renormalization group (RG) approach (Gell- Mann and Low (1954); Bogoliubov and Shirkov (1959); Bonch-Bruevich and Tyablikov (1962)) was introduced in critical phenomena (Di Castro and Jona-Lasinio (1969)) by showing how the RG equations generalize the universality relations in the sense that they relate one model system to another by varying the coupling and suitably rescaling the other variables and the correlation functions. At the same time a detailed analysis of the pertubative diagrammatic structure of the correlation functions together with the use of Ward identities yielded a renormalized theory (Migdal (1969); Polyakov (1968, 1969)). By iterating the RG transformation the coupling disappears from the equations near to the critical point, the homogeneous form of the static order-parameter correlation function is obtained and a microscopic definition of the critical indices is given. The scaling picture then acquires a theoretical basis. Wilson (Wilson (1971a, b); Wilson and Kogut (1974)) gave a great contribution to the understanding of the physics underlying the RG procedure and to the explicit calculation of the critical indices. He proposed a simple mathematical realization of the other very physical idea of universality due to Kadanoff of grouping together degrees of freedom on the scale s associated with larger and larger cells.
If we study the history of science we see produced two phenomena which are, so to speak, each the inverse of the other. Sometimes it is simplicity which is hidden under what is apparently complex; sometimes, on the contrary, it is simplicity which is apparent, and which conceals extremely complex realities. Henri Poincaré Devoting only a short chapter to the renormalization group (RG) is a challenge owing to the wealth of both fundamental concepts and computational tools associated with this term. The RG is indeed encountered in many different domains of theoretical physics, ranging from quantum electrodynamics to second-order phase transitions to fractal growth and diffusion processes – one should rather speak of renormalization group S ! We refer to Brown (1993) and Fisher (1998) for an historical account, to Goldenfeld (1992) and Lesne (1998) and references therein for an overview of the domains of application and variants of RGs. We here emphasize that the RG is a way, maybe the most successful and with no doubt the most systematic and constructive, to derive effective low-dimensional descriptions that capture large-scale and/or long-time behavior . The RG can be extended far beyond the specific scope of critical phenomena, to an iterated multiscale approach allowing the construction of robust and minimal macroscopic models describing the universal large-scale features and asymptotics of a complex system. This generalized viewpoint brings out the close logical and even technical connections that bridge, within a unified framework, perturbative RG for singular series expansions, spin-block RG and momentum-shell RG for critical phenomena, RG for the asymptotic analysis of differential and partial differential equations, and probabilistic RG for the derivation of statistical laws and limit theorems.