Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The ANZIAM Journal

THE METRIC OPERATORS FOR PSEUDO-HERMITIAN HAMILTONIAN

Wenhua Wang, ZhengLi Chen, W. Li

Published Jul 1, 2023• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract The Hamiltonian of a conventional quantum system is Hermitian, which ensures real spectra of the Hamiltonian and unitary evolution of the system. However, real spectra are just the necessary conditions for a Hamiltonian to be Hermitian. In this paper, we discuss the metric operators for pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian which is similar to its adjoint. We first present some properties of the metric operators for pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians and obtain a sufficient and necessary condition for an invertible operator to be a metric operator for a given pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian. When the pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian has real spectra, we provide a new method such that any given metric operator can be transformed into the same positive-definite one and the new inner product with respect to the positive-definite metric operator is well defined. Finally, we illustrate the results obtained with an example.

DOI
10.1017/s1446181123000184

Related papers

Pseudo-reality and pseudo-adjointness of Hamiltonians

Zafar Ahmed

We define pseudo-reality and pseudo-adjointness of a Hamiltonian, H , as ρ H ρ −1 = H * and μ H μ −1 = H ', respectively. We prove that the former yields the necessary condition for a spectrum to be real whereas the latter helps in fixing a definition for the inner-product of the eigenstates. Here we separate out the adjointness of an operator from its Hermitian adjointness. It turns out that a Hamiltonian possessing a real spectrum is first pseudo-real, further it could be Hermitian, PT -symmetric or pseudo-Hermitian.

arXiv:quant-ph/0306093•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Oct 1, 2003•11 citations

Pseudo-reality and pseudo-adjointness of Hamiltonians

Zafar Ahmed

We define pseudo-reality and pseudo-adjointness of a Hamiltonian, $H$, as $rho H rho^{-1}=H^ast$ and $mu H mu^{-1}=H^prime$, respectively. We prove that the former yields the {it necessary} condition for spectrum to be real whereas the latter helps in fixing a definition for inner-product of the eigenstates. Here we separate out adjointness of an operator from its Hermitian-adjointness. It turns out that a Hamiltonian possessing real spectrum is first pseudo-real, further it could be Hermitian, PT-symmetric or pseudo-Hermitian.

•Jan 1, 2003•7 citations

On the construction of a pseudo-Hermitian quantum system with a pre-determined metric in the Hilbert space

Pijush K Ghosh

A class of pseudo-Hermitian quantum system with an explicit form of the positive-definite metric in the Hilbert space is presented. The general method involves a realization of the basic canonical commutation relations defining the quantum system in terms of operators that are Hermitian with respect to a pre-determined positive-definite metric in the Hilbert space. Appropriate combinations of these operators result in a large number of pseudo-Hermitian quantum systems admitting entirely real spectra and unitary time evolution. The examples considered include simple harmonic oscillators with complex angular frequencies, Stark (Zeeman) effect with non-Hermitian interaction, non-Hermitian general quadratic form of N boson (fermion) operators, symmetric and asymmetric XXZ spin chain in the complex magnetic field, non-Hermitian Haldane–Shastry spin chain and Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model.

arXiv:0908.1321•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Mar 4, 2010•13 citations

Metric operator in pseudo-Hermitian quantum mechanics and the imaginary cubic potential

Ali Mostafazadeh

We present a systematic perturbative construction of the most general metric operator (and positive-definite inner product) for quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonians of the standard form, , in one dimension. We show that this problem is equivalent to solving an infinite system of iteratively decoupled hyperbolic partial differential equations in (1 + 1)-dimensions. For the case that v ( x ) is purely imaginary, the latter have the form of a nonhomogeneous wave equation which admits an exact solution. We apply our general method to obtain the most general metric operator for the imaginary cubic potential, v ( x ) = i x 3 . This reveals an infinite class of previously unknown - as well as non- -inner products. We compute the physical observables of the corresponding unitary quantum system and determine the underlying classical system. Our results for the imaginary cubic potential show that, unlike the quantum system, the corresponding classical system is not sensitive to the choice of the metric operator. As another application of our method we give a complete characterization of the pseudo-Hermitian canonical quantization of a free particle moving in that is consistent with the usual choice for the quantum Hamiltonian. Finally, we discuss subtleties involved with higher dimensions and systems having a fixed length scale.

arXiv:quant-ph/0508195•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jul 26, 2006•103 citations

Comparison of Different Approaches of Finding the Positive Definite Metric in Pseudo-Hermitian Theories

Ananya Ghatak, Bhabani Prasad Mandal

To develop a unitary quantum theory with probabilistic description for pseudo-Hermitian systems one needs to consider the theories in a different Hilbert space endowed with a positive definite metric operator. There are different approaches to find such metric operators. We compare the different approaches of calculating positive definite metric operators in pseudo-Hermitian theories with the help of several explicit examples in non-relativistic as well as in relativistic situations. Exceptional points and spontaneous symmetry breaking are also discussed in these models.

arXiv:1305.2022•Communications in Theoretical Physics•May 1, 2013•12 citations

On the pseudo-Hermitian invariant method for the time-dependent Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

Boubakeur Khantoul, Abdelhafid Bounames, Mustapha Maamache

We propose a scheme to deal with certain time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian operators $H(t)$ that generate a real phase in their time-evolution. This involves the use of invariant operators $I_{PH}(t)$ that are pseudo-Hermitian with respect to the time-dependent metric operator and which implies that the dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. Furthermore, $H(t)$ is not generally quasi-Hermitian and does not define an observable of the system but $I_{PH}(t)$ obeys a quasi-hermiticity transformation as in the completely time-independent Hamiltonian systems case. The harmonic oscillator with a time-dependent frequency under the action of a complex time-dependent linear potential is considered as an illustrative example.

•Oct 28, 2016•3 citations
Abstract The Hamiltonian of a conventional quantum system is Hermitian, which ensures real spectra of the Hamiltonian and unitary evolution of the system. However, real spectra are just the necessary conditions for a Hamiltonian to be Hermitian. In this paper, we discuss the metric operators for pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian which is similar to its adjoint. We first present some properties of the metric operators for pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians and obtain a sufficient and necessary condition for an invertible operator to be a metric operator for a given pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian. When the pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian has real spectra, we provide a new method such that any given metric operator can be transformed into the same positive-definite one and the new inner product with respect to the positive-definite metric operator is well defined. Finally, we illustrate the results obtained with an example.
We define pseudo-reality and pseudo-adjointness of a Hamiltonian, H , as ρ H ρ −1 = H * and μ H μ −1 = H ', respectively. We prove that the former yields the necessary condition for a spectrum to be real whereas the latter helps in fixing a definition for the inner-product of the eigenstates. Here we separate out the adjointness of an operator from its Hermitian adjointness. It turns out that a Hamiltonian possessing a real spectrum is first pseudo-real, further it could be Hermitian, PT -symmetric or pseudo-Hermitian.
We define pseudo-reality and pseudo-adjointness of a Hamiltonian, HHH, as rhoHrho−1=Hastrho H rho^{-1}=H^astrhoHrho−1=Hast and muHmu−1=Hprimemu H mu^{-1}=H^primemuHmu−1=Hprime, respectively. We prove that the former yields the {it necessary} condition for spectrum to be real whereas the latter helps in fixing a definition for inner-product of the eigenstates. Here we separate out adjointness of an operator from its Hermitian-adjointness. It turns out that a Hamiltonian possessing real spectrum is first pseudo-real, further it could be Hermitian, PT-symmetric or pseudo-Hermitian.
A class of pseudo-Hermitian quantum system with an explicit form of the positive-definite metric in the Hilbert space is presented. The general method involves a realization of the basic canonical commutation relations defining the quantum system in terms of operators that are Hermitian with respect to a pre-determined positive-definite metric in the Hilbert space. Appropriate combinations of these operators result in a large number of pseudo-Hermitian quantum systems admitting entirely real spectra and unitary time evolution. The examples considered include simple harmonic oscillators with complex angular frequencies, Stark (Zeeman) effect with non-Hermitian interaction, non-Hermitian general quadratic form of N boson (fermion) operators, symmetric and asymmetric XXZ spin chain in the complex magnetic field, non-Hermitian Haldane–Shastry spin chain and Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model.
We present a systematic perturbative construction of the most general metric operator (and positive-definite inner product) for quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonians of the standard form, , in one dimension. We show that this problem is equivalent to solving an infinite system of iteratively decoupled hyperbolic partial differential equations in (1 + 1)-dimensions. For the case that v ( x ) is purely imaginary, the latter have the form of a nonhomogeneous wave equation which admits an exact solution. We apply our general method to obtain the most general metric operator for the imaginary cubic potential, v ( x ) = i x 3 . This reveals an infinite class of previously unknown - as well as non- -inner products. We compute the physical observables of the corresponding unitary quantum system and determine the underlying classical system. Our results for the imaginary cubic potential show that, unlike the quantum system, the corresponding classical system is not sensitive to the choice of the metric operator. As another application of our method we give a complete characterization of the pseudo-Hermitian canonical quantization of a free particle moving in that is consistent with the usual choice for the quantum Hamiltonian. Finally, we discuss subtleties involved with higher dimensions and systems having a fixed length scale.
To develop a unitary quantum theory with probabilistic description for pseudo-Hermitian systems one needs to consider the theories in a different Hilbert space endowed with a positive definite metric operator. There are different approaches to find such metric operators. We compare the different approaches of calculating positive definite metric operators in pseudo-Hermitian theories with the help of several explicit examples in non-relativistic as well as in relativistic situations. Exceptional points and spontaneous symmetry breaking are also discussed in these models.
We propose a scheme to deal with certain time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian operators H(t)H(t)H(t) that generate a real phase in their time-evolution. This involves the use of invariant operators IPH(t)I_{PH}(t)IPH​(t) that are pseudo-Hermitian with respect to the time-dependent metric operator and which implies that the dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. Furthermore, H(t)H(t)H(t) is not generally quasi-Hermitian and does not define an observable of the system but IPH(t)I_{PH}(t)IPH​(t) obeys a quasi-hermiticity transformation as in the completely time-independent Hamiltonian systems case. The harmonic oscillator with a time-dependent frequency under the action of a complex time-dependent linear potential is considered as an illustrative example.