Quantum computing is an emerging field that can effectively solve several machine learning problems. The immensely growing data size has begun to create barriers for classical machine learning algorithms. Quantum computers proficiently handle and process big data composed of metrics and vectors. This paper presents the quantum machine learning model based on quantum support vector machines (QSVM) to classify brain tumours into malignant and benign. The dataset used in this experiment is Brats 2015, available on Kaggle. The QSVM-based model was run on real-time quantum machines and simulators to extract the performance metrics in terms of accuracy and execution time. The QSVM classification model is compared with its classical SVM equivalent. The kernel-based QSVM model implementation on a 32-qubit quantum simulator was 188 times faster with 95% accuracy which is 1.60% better than the classical equivalent. Similarly, the model takes 24.19% less time than the classical SVM model when realized on a 5-qubit real-time superconducting processor with the same accuracy. Hence, the results reveal that quantum machine learning models implemented on quantum computers outperformed their classical equivalents.
Quantum computing is an emerging field that can effectively solve several machine learning problems. The immensely growing data size has begun to create barriers for classical machine learning algorithms. Quantum computers proficiently handle and process big data composed of metrics and vectors. This paper presents the quantum machine learning model based on quantum support vector machines (QSVM) to classify brain tumours into malignant and benign. The dataset used in this experiment is Brats 2015, available on Kaggle. The QSVM-based model was run on real-time quantum machines and simulators to extract the performance metrics in terms of accuracy and execution time. The QSVM classification model is compared with its classical SVM equivalent. The kernel-based QSVM model implementation on a 32-qubit quantum simulator was 188 times faster with 95% accuracy which is 1.60% better than the classical equivalent. Similarly, the model takes 24.19% less time than the classical SVM model when realized on a 5-qubit real-time superconducting processor with the same accuracy. Hence, the results reveal that quantum machine learning models implemented on quantum computers outperformed their classical equivalents.
Quantum support vector machines (QSVMs) are a novel approach for solving classification problems, combining the principles of quantum computing with the support vector machine algorithm. In this study, we applied a QSVM to the Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Original) data set to classify tumors as benign or malignant. Our results showed that the QSVM outperformed classical support vector machines in terms of classification accuracy, achieving a success rate of 100% while classical SVM shows almost perfect result with its accuracy 95%. Additionally, the QSVM required significantly less training time compared to the classical SVM. These results demonstrate the potential of QSVMs for solving complex classification problems in the field of medical diagnosis.
Quantum computing is an emerging field with the potential to address challenges faced by classical computation, particularly in the management of large datasets. As the volume of data has increased, classical machine learning models, including large language models, face significant obstacles in training and performance. In contrast, quantum computers offer theoretical advantages in processing these large datasets comprised of metrics and vectors. However, to facilitate broader adoption, it is essential for quantum systems to demonstrate stability and reliability, akin to the consistency found in classical Turing machines. This paper evaluates quantum computers from the IBM Eagle family using a Quantum Support Vector Classifier (QSVC) model to classify brain tumors as malignant or benign. Using the Brats 2015 dataset available on Kaggle, the QSVC model achieves an impressive accuracy rate of 98.5% when analyzing two-dimensional data, a performance level consistently observed across the Eagle family of quantum computers. Moreover, our methodology involves creating sub-datasets of varying dimensions, contributing to the characterization of quantum hardware’s performance under increasing complexity. By focusing on the classification of brain tumors through Quantum Machine Learning (QML), this study aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency within the biomedical field, leveraging benefits over classical machine learning approaches. The findings confirm the hypothesis that the IBM Eagle backends are reliable and produce consistent results under different conditions. Additionally, the research demonstrates significant speedups in processing times for QML compared to classical methods, underscoring the potential of quantum computing in practical biomedical applications.
Accurate disease diagnosis is becoming a critical challenge owing to the limited success of classical machine-learning approaches, especially in classification problems. Accurate and rapid brain tumor classification in medical diagnosis could aid in early detection and treatment planning. This paper presents a novel quantum-enhanced machine learning approach using a Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM) and Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC) models for improved tumor classification. ZFeatureMap is deployed for the conversion of classical data points to quantum space, as it is found to be most suitable for the characteristics of the brain tumor dataset and provides a balance between accuracy, efficiency, and computational feasibility. The QSVM and VQC models are implemented on a publicly available brain tumor dataset, demonstrating significant improvement over classical algorithms. Both models were implemented on a 32-qubit quantum simulator and a seven-qubit quantum computer. The simulation results indicate that the QSVM-based model is 3.62% more accurate and 60.4 times faster, while the VQC-based model is 2.49% more accurate and twice as fast as classical SVM. The findings suggest that quantum-enhanced machine learning has the scope to revolutionize medical diagnosis with more precise and faster results.
Quantum computing is a promising new approach to tackle the complex real-world computational problems by harnessing the power of quantum mechanics principles. The inherent parallelism and exponential computational power of quantum systems hold the potential to outpace classical counterparts in solving complex optimization problems, which are pervasive in machine learning. Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM) is a quantum machine learning algorithm inspired by classical Support Vector Machine (SVM) that exploits quantum parallelism to efficiently classify data points in high-dimensional feature spaces. We provide a comprehensive overview of the underlying principles of QSVM, elucidating how different quantum feature maps and quantum kernels enable the manipulation of quantum states to perform classification tasks. Through a comparative analysis, we reveal the quantum advantage achieved by these algorithms in terms of speedup and solution quality. As a case study, we explored the potential of quantum paradigms in the context of a real-world problem: classifying pancreatic cancer biomarker data. The Support Vector Classifier (SVC) algorithm was employed for the classical approach while the QSVM algorithm was executed on a quantum simulator provided by the Qiskit quantum computing framework. The classical approach as well as the quantum-based techniques reported similar accuracy. This uniformity suggests that these methods effectively captured similar underlying patterns in the dataset. Remarkably, quantum implementations exhibited substantially reduced execution times demonstrating the potential of quantum approaches in enhancing classification efficiency. This affirms the growing significance of quantum computing as a transformative tool for augmenting machine learning paradigms and also underscores the potency of quantum execution for computational acceleration.
Quantum machine learning (QML) is an evolving field which is capable of surpassing the classical machine learning in solving classification and clustering problems. The enormous growth in data size started creating barrier for classical machine learning techniques. QML stand out as a best solution to handle big and complex data. In this paper quantum support vector machine (QSVM) based models for the classification of three benchmarking datasets namely, Iris species, Pumpkin seed and Raisin has been constructed. These QSVM based classification models are implemented on real-time superconducting quantum computers/simulators. The performance of these classification models is evaluated in the context of execution time and accuracy and compared with the classical support vector machine (SVM) based models. The kernel based QSVM models for the classification of datasets when run on IBMQ_QASM_simulator appeared to be 232, 207 and 186 times faster than the SVM based classification model. The results indicate that quantum computers/algorithms deliver quantum speed-up.
A potential path forward is Quantum Machine Learning (QML), which aims to leverage quantum computing in conjunction with classical machine learning to enhance computing efficiency and the expressiveness of models. In this paper, two different quantum classifiers - Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC) and Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machine (QSVM) - are compared with three classical classifiers as baseline classifiers - Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) - on the Breast Cancer Wisconsin dataset. The quantum circuits were created in the PennyLane framework and simulated on a classical backend. However, in terms of accuracy, classical Logistic Regression performed better with an accuracy of 97.8%, classical SVM and QSVM with an accuracy of 95.6% each, although the Quantum VQC achieved a lower accuracy of 88.9% and had a recall of 100% for the benign class, though it correctly identified only 12 of the 17 malignant cases (a malignant-class recall of approximately 70.6%). The drawback of quantum models is the higher training time; however, since the quantum circuit needs to be classically simulated, the quantum SVM took 23.29 seconds compared to less than 0.01 seconds for the classical linear models. These results indicate that for small structured datasets, classifiers based on quantum computing have not yet surpassed well-tuned classical counterparts. In some respects (e.g., benign-class recall), they perform competitively, though not on malignant-class recall, where the VQC in particular performed worse than the classical baselines, which is worth further investigation on real quantum computers.