Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Additive Randomized Encodings and Their Applications

Shai Halevi, Yuval Ishai, Eyal Kushilevitz Z, Tal Rabin

Published Jan 1, 2023• 8 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-38557-5_7

Related papers

Negative Results on Information-Theoretic Additive Randomized Encodings

Keitaro Hiwatashi

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2025•1 citation

Efficient Additive Randomized Encodings for String Oblivious Transfer: A Core Primitive for General Functions

Masaya Yoshimura, Kyoichi Asano, Yugo Kasashima +2 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Quadratic Multiparty Randomized Encodings Beyond Honest Majority and Their Applications

Benny Applebaum, Yuval Ishai, Or Karni +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2022•2 citations

Quantum randomized encoding, verification of quantum computing, no-cloning, and blind quantum computing

Tomoyuki Morimae

Randomized encoding is a powerful cryptographic primitive with various applications such as secure multiparty computation, verifiable computation, parallel cryptography, and complexity lower bounds. Intuitively, randomized encoding $\hat{f}$ of a function $f$ is another function such that $f(x)$ can be recovered from $\hat{f}(x)$, and nothing except for $f(x)$ is leaked from $\hat{f}(x)$. Its quantum version, quantum randomized encoding, has been introduced recently [Brakerski and Yuen, arXiv:2006.01085]. Intuitively, quantum randomized encoding $\hat{F}$ of a quantum operation $F$ is another quantum operation such that, for any quantum state $\rho$, $F(\rho)$ can be recovered from $\hat{F}(\rho)$, and nothing except for $F(\rho)$ is leaked from $\hat{F}(\rho)$. In this paper, we show three results. First, we show that if quantum randomized encoding of BB84 state generations is possible with an encoding operation $E$, then a two-round verification of quantum computing is possible with a classical verifier who can additionally do the operation $E$. One of the most important goals in the field of the verification of quantum computing is to construct a verification protocol with a verifier as classical as possible. This result therefore demonstrates a potential application of quantum randomized encoding to the verification of quantum computing: if we can find a good quantum randomized encoding (in terms of the encoding complexity), then we can construct a good verification protocol of quantum computing. Our second result is, however, to show that too good quantum randomized encoding is impossible: if quantum randomized encoding for the generation of even simple states (such as BB84 states) is possible with a classical encoding operation, then the no-cloning is violated. Finally, we consider a natural modification of blind quantum computing protocols in such a way that the server gets the output like quantum randomized encoding. We show that the modified protocol is not secure.

arXiv:2011.03141•Quantum Information and Computation•Sep 1, 2021•1 citation

Quantum Primitive for Output-Hiding Function Sharing: QKD and Joint Computation Applications

Olivia R. Hartzell

Applications of the proposed primitive: Quantum Primitive for Output-Hiding Function Sharing, are discussed for secure quantum communications and computation protocols. In particular, QKD applications provide notable enhanced security and efficiency properties relative to status-quo protocols. Additionally, we provide examples when parties may wish to encode joint functions, or decisions, which remain information-theoretically hidden from external parties and those internal to the quantum system, without additional private keys, hidden randomness, or classical communication. In particular these applications may be useful in domains such as; financial transactions, joint signaling or coordination decisions, and navigation systems, among others.

quant-pharXiv:2606.28997•Jun 30, 2026•0 citations

Time-multiplexed polarization drift compensation for polarization-encoded quantum key distribution systems

Piotr Novik

Polarization drift due to propagation medium birefringence is a primary cause of increased quantum bit error ratio (QBER) in polarization-encoded quantum key distribution (QKD). The random nature of polarization drift and environmental instabilities cause it to vary over time, necessitating algorithms for effective polarization drift compensation in polarization-encoded optical fiber QKD links. I propose an algorithm based on processing time-multiplexed control pulses by unscented Kalman filter that minimizes the number of additional measurements that interrupt key exchange. I evaluated the robustness of the algorithm under various conditions, including random polarization drift velocities, and additional noise due to depolarization for weak-coherent BB84-like protocols, to determine the applicability limits of the proposed algorithm and its overhead.

Optics Express•Jul 23, 2025•0 citations
Randomized encoding is a powerful cryptographic primitive with various applications such as secure multiparty computation, verifiable computation, parallel cryptography, and complexity lower bounds. Intuitively, randomized encoding f^\hat{f}f^​ of a function fff is another function such that f(x)f(x)f(x) can be recovered from f^(x)\hat{f}(x)f^​(x), and nothing except for f(x)f(x)f(x) is leaked from f^(x)\hat{f}(x)f^​(x). Its quantum version, quantum randomized encoding, has been introduced recently [Brakerski and Yuen, arXiv:2006.01085]. Intuitively, quantum randomized encoding F^\hat{F}F^ of a quantum operation FFF is another quantum operation such that, for any quantum state ρ\rhoρ, F(ρ)F(\rho)F(ρ) can be recovered from F^(ρ)\hat{F}(\rho)F^(ρ), and nothing except for F(ρ)F(\rho)F(ρ) is leaked from F^(ρ)\hat{F}(\rho)F^(ρ). In this paper, we show three results. First, we show that if quantum randomized encoding of BB84 state generations is possible with an encoding operation EEE, then a two-round verification of quantum computing is possible with a classical verifier who can additionally do the operation EEE. One of the most important goals in the field of the verification of quantum computing is to construct a verification protocol with a verifier as classical as possible. This result therefore demonstrates a potential application of quantum randomized encoding to the verification of quantum computing: if we can find a good quantum randomized encoding (in terms of the encoding complexity), then we can construct a good verification protocol of quantum computing. Our second result is, however, to show that too good quantum randomized encoding is impossible: if quantum randomized encoding for the generation of even simple states (such as BB84 states) is possible with a classical encoding operation, then the no-cloning is violated. Finally, we consider a natural modification of blind quantum computing protocols in such a way that the server gets the output like quantum randomized encoding. We show that the modified protocol is not secure.
Applications of the proposed primitive: Quantum Primitive for Output-Hiding Function Sharing, are discussed for secure quantum communications and computation protocols. In particular, QKD applications provide notable enhanced security and efficiency properties relative to status-quo protocols. Additionally, we provide examples when parties may wish to encode joint functions, or decisions, which remain information-theoretically hidden from external parties and those internal to the quantum system, without additional private keys, hidden randomness, or classical communication. In particular these applications may be useful in domains such as; financial transactions, joint signaling or coordination decisions, and navigation systems, among others.
Polarization drift due to propagation medium birefringence is a primary cause of increased quantum bit error ratio (QBER) in polarization-encoded quantum key distribution (QKD). The random nature of polarization drift and environmental instabilities cause it to vary over time, necessitating algorithms for effective polarization drift compensation in polarization-encoded optical fiber QKD links. I propose an algorithm based on processing time-multiplexed control pulses by unscented Kalman filter that minimizes the number of additional measurements that interrupt key exchange. I evaluated the robustness of the algorithm under various conditions, including random polarization drift velocities, and additional noise due to depolarization for weak-coherent BB84-like protocols, to determine the applicability limits of the proposed algorithm and its overhead.