The Rendering of Impermanence: Zen Phenomenology and the Light & Flux Framework
Tim Siu Ming Shum
Abstract The Light & Flux framework (L&F) derives complex Hilbert space as the unique inferential geometry available to finite agents, identifying macroscopic classicality as a lossy compression forced by rate-distortion necessity. This paper argues that Zen Buddhist contemplative phenomenology constitutes independent, first-person convergent evidence for this structural diagnosis. Treating contemplative reports as data generated by agents who have partially destabilized their own Classical Markov Blankets, we construct a strict tier-by-tier mapping between L&F’s architecture and central Buddhist doctrines. Anicca (impermanence) maps onto the structured absence of the Latent Markov Substrate (Tier 1). The Kantian Codec—spacetime, local causality, and narrative selfhood—maps onto the Zen diagnosis of the fabricated world and constructed self (Anattā, Tier 3). Śūnyatā (emptiness) maps onto the Non-Derivability Principle, establishing that classical outcomes are formally “empty” of Tier 2 grounding because the Simplex Projection is non-invertible. Nāgārjuna’s tetralemma is shown to diagnose the exact interpretive errors rejected by L&F’s tier discipline, and his Middle Way is identified as the philosophical correlate of that discipline—grounded not in preference but in rate-distortion necessity. We do not claim either tradition proves the other. Rather, they establish a mutual constraint: L&F supplies a formal vocabulary that renders Zen reports structurally precise, while Zen provides experiential evidence that L&F’s Copernican inversion corresponds to accessible features of consciousness. Ultimately, both converge on a shared epistemic limit: the Kantian Codec cannot fully represent its own origin.
•Apr 13, 2026•0 citations