Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Scientist

Computing Outside the Box

Simson Garfinkel, Rachel Grunspan

Published Dec 12, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1511/2019.107.1.54

Related papers

Thinking Outside the (Particle in a) Box

Nathaniel C. Blank, Kate Clemons, Ryan Crowdis +17 more

We investigate the problem of a quantum particle confined in a finite one-dimensional square well. The eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are found using a computer algebra system to solve the equations that result from matching the logarithmic derivatives at the well boundaries. The wavefunctions are used to investigate the relation of well depth to tunneling and to the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. We demonstrate how dimensional analysis can be used to locate the minimum uncertainty for a given confining potential.

The Chemical Educator•Feb 1, 2010•0 citations

A new computing principle

H.A. Fatmi, Germano Resconi

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Feb 1, 1988•17 citations

Quantum interpolation of polynomials

Daniel M. Kane, Samuel Kutin

Can a quantum computer efficiently interpolate polynomials? We consider black-box algorithms that seek to learn information about a polynomial $f$ from input/output pairs $(x_i, f(x_i))$. We define a more general class of \emph{$(d,S)$-independent} function properties, where, outside of a set $S$ of exceptions, knowing $d$ input values does not help one predict the answer. There are essentially two strategies to computing such a function: query $d+1$ random input values, or search for one of the $|S|$ exceptions. We show that, up to constant factors, we cannot beat these two approaches.

Quantum Information and Computation•Jan 1, 2011•7 citations

Next generation computing

Jim Stikeleather

Cyber Security and Information Intelligence Research Workshop•Apr 21, 2010•3 citations

Einstein’s photon box revisited

Heinz–Jürgen Schmidt

Abstract We present a reformulation of Bohr’s analysis of Einstein’s thought experiment with the photon box, which hopefully settles some unclear issues. The box is weighed by two position measurements, the first immediately before the emission of the photon and the second after a quarter period of oscillation of the box, or alternatively after a half period. These times are precisely defined with respect to the moving clock installed in the box, but vary statistically when measured with a stationary clock outside the box, due to gravitational time dilation in accordance with Bohr’s original idea. Moreover, we will discuss two other proposals to solve the apparent inconsistency without invoking the theory of general relativity.

arXiv:2112.14659•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jul 21, 2022•2 citations

Unconventional Computation

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2007•13 citations
We investigate the problem of a quantum particle confined in a finite one-dimensional square well. The eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are found using a computer algebra system to solve the equations that result from matching the logarithmic derivatives at the well boundaries. The wavefunctions are used to investigate the relation of well depth to tunneling and to the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. We demonstrate how dimensional analysis can be used to locate the minimum uncertainty for a given confining potential.
Can a quantum computer efficiently interpolate polynomials? We consider black-box algorithms that seek to learn information about a polynomial fff from input/output pairs (xi,f(xi))(x_i, f(x_i))(xi​,f(xi​)). We define a more general class of \emph{(d,S)(d,S)(d,S)-independent} function properties, where, outside of a set SSS of exceptions, knowing ddd input values does not help one predict the answer. There are essentially two strategies to computing such a function: query d+1d+1d+1 random input values, or search for one of the ∣S∣|S|∣S∣ exceptions. We show that, up to constant factors, we cannot beat these two approaches.
Abstract We present a reformulation of Bohr’s analysis of Einstein’s thought experiment with the photon box, which hopefully settles some unclear issues. The box is weighed by two position measurements, the first immediately before the emission of the photon and the second after a quarter period of oscillation of the box, or alternatively after a half period. These times are precisely defined with respect to the moving clock installed in the box, but vary statistically when measured with a stationary clock outside the box, due to gravitational time dilation in accordance with Bohr’s original idea. Moreover, we will discuss two other proposals to solve the apparent inconsistency without invoking the theory of general relativity.