Abstract We show that there is a hidden freedom in quantum many-body theory associated with overcompleteness of the time evolution through the single-particle subspace of a many-body system. To fix the freedom, an additional constraint is necessary. We argue that the appropriate constraint on the time evolution through the subspace is to quantize the propagation of entangled pairs of particles, represented by the single-particle spectral function, instead of individual particles. This solution method creates a surface that indicates the multiplicity of every solution to the inverse problem defined by matching the freedom to the constraint. Upon measurement, the system collapses nonlocally onto a single quantized solution. In addition to a combinatoric multiplicity, each solution acquires a multiplicity due to its stability when subject to a small variation in the microscopic degrees of freedom. Numerical calculations for a two-level system show that our theory improves upon standard theory in the description of non-quasiparticle spectral features. Our reinterpretation of quantum many-body theory is not based on the Born rule and offers a more faithful representation of experiments than current theory by modeling individual, quantized events with an explicit collapse model.
Abstract We show that there is a hidden freedom in quantum many-body theory associated with overcompleteness of the time evolution through the single-particle subspace of a many-body system. To fix the freedom, an additional constraint is necessary. We argue that the appropriate constraint on the time evolution through the subspace is to quantize the propagation of entangled pairs of particles, represented by the single-particle spectral function, instead of individual particles. This solution method creates a surface that indicates the multiplicity of every solution to the inverse problem defined by matching the freedom to the constraint. Upon measurement, the system collapses nonlocally onto a single quantized solution. In addition to a combinatoric multiplicity, each solution acquires a multiplicity due to its stability when subject to a small variation in the microscopic degrees of freedom. Numerical calculations for a two-level system show that our theory improves upon standard theory in the description of non-quasiparticle spectral features. Our reinterpretation of quantum many-body theory is not based on the Born rule and offers a more faithful representation of experiments than current theory by modeling individual, quantized events with an explicit collapse model.
We propose a reinterpretation and reformulation of the single-particle Green's function in nonrelativistic quantum many-body theory with an emphasis on normalization. By downfolding a correlation function covering all of Fock space into the observable portion, we derive a nonlocal Dyson equation which depends on an unknown downfolding frequency. The downfolding frequency is determined by solving the inverse problem so that the spectral function of the single-particle propagator is a Dirac-δ function. Upon measurement, the system collapses stochastically onto one of these normalized solutions. This collapse has a nonlocal effect on the path the particle takes, in agreement with quantum entanglement. We postulate that the multiplicity of each quantized solution is directly related to the ensemble averaged spectrum and the entropy created by measurement of the particle. In the final part, we outline a new picture of dynamics in quantum many-body systems. As a function of the coupling strength, the multiplicity for collapse has a complicated form due to the shape of the quantization condition. This structure creates an entropic force from counting quantized solutions which is predominantly attractive but likely also has a narrow repulsive regime at weak coupling. Upon collapse, an internal spacetime forms between the two points in order to carry the information gained from the reduction of the probabilistic many-body state. The repeated creation of these spacetime bridges defines an internal spacetime with a complicated shape and history. We treat the quantum system as a finite informational resource that holds information about possible normalized outcomes, collapses the wave function to reset after encountering a conflict, and creates an internal spacetime to carry the information gained with every collapse.
Quantum theory has evolved from a set of provisional rules to an indispensable framework that underlies much of modern technology and infrastructure. Yet, after a century, Born's probability postulate remains at odds with the theory's unitary character. The problem stems from the linearity of the Schrödinger equation, as linear systems are insensitive to the magnitudes of their solutions' coefficients. If measurement is unitary, and thus linear, how can the frequency of an outcome depend on the magnitude of its amplitude? And if not, at what scale does unitarity break down? This question remains pressing, as the assumption of unitarity underlies both the design of large-scale fault-tolerant quantum devices, as well as our understanding of fundamental aspects of our universe, for example, the black hole information problem. Proponents of the many-worlds interpretation have argued that Born's rule is observed because events that violate it have vanishing norms, and so must be unphysical. However, this argument has only been made explicit for special cases involving infinitely many identical states. In this paper we provide a generalized form of Born's rule applicable to measurements of arbitrarily-prepared factorizable states, and prove that such systems contain no histories that violate Born's rule. Our result therefore demonstrates that purely unitary evolution can co-exist with Born's rule under more relaxed conditions. In addition, we apply our generalized rule to the problem of quantum circuit fidelity, and provide a single-shot alternative to cross-entropy benchmarking based on self-information rate.
The Born rule, assigning probabilities via |ψ|², is traditionally introduced as an independent axiom of quantum mechanics. Despite its empirical success, its foundational origin remains unresolved. In this paper we derive the Born rule as a necessary consequence of configurational stability in a timeless, pre-metric configuration space. Physical states are described by field configurations Φ, weighted by a stability functional S[Φ]. Quantum states ψ arise as representational coordinates encoding relative stability rather than as ontological wave objects. We show that requiring: projective invariance, factorizability for independent subsystems, and classical additivity under phase degradation, uniquely selects the quadratic probability map |ψ|², without assuming Hilbert space structure, Gleason-type theorems, or temporal dynamics. Measurement is identified as a topological transition at a stability threshold Σ*, where the Hessian spectrum becomes marginally stable. This leads to a distinctive, non-analytic “kink” in decoherence behavior. Unlike stochastic collapse models, the framework predicts pure dephasing without energy injection, avoiding existing experimental heating constraints. The theory yields explicit, falsifiable experimental signatures, including structure-dependent decoherence effects in mesoscopic systems, accessible to current matter-wave interferometry and levitated nanosphere experiments. The framework is fully timeless at the fundamental level; laboratory time emerges only as an epistemic ordering parameter. This work is self-contained and does not rely on gravitational, cosmological, or dark-matter assumptions. Keywords quantum foundations; Born rule; measurement problem; decoherence; timeless physics; configuration space; stability theory; quantum-classical boundary
Abstract We propose a complete proof of the Born rule using an additional postulate stating that for a short enough time Δt Δ t between two measurements, a property of a particle will keep its values fixed. This dynamical postulate allows us to produce the Born rule in its explicit form by improving the result given in [1]. While the proposed postulate is still not part of the quantum mechanics postulates, every experiment obeys it, and it cannot be deduced using the standard postulates of quantum mechanics.
Attempts to derive the Born rule, either in the Many Worlds or Copenhagen interpretation, are unsatisfactory for systems with only a finite number of degrees of freedom. In the case of Many Worlds this is a serious problem, since its goal is to account for apparent collapse phenomena, including the Born rule for probabilities, assuming only unitary evolution of the wavefunction. For finite number of degrees of freedom, observers on the vast majority of branches would not deduce the Born rule. However, discreteness of the quantum state space, even if extremely tiny, may restore the validity of the usual arguments.
The Schrödinger equation and the Born rule constitute two of the most successful structures in quantum mechanics. The former governs the continuous evolution of the wave function, while the latter connects its squared amplitude to the statistical distribution of experimental outcomes. Yet these two structures operate at different descriptive levels: the Schrödinger state is continuous, spatially extended, and phase-sensitive, whereas individual experiments terminate in localized physical events. This paper develops a theoretical framework for reconstructing the physical relation between these two levels. Rather than proceeding only in the conventional direction from Schrödinger dynamics to Born probabilities, we introduce an inverse explanatory strategy: from Born back to Schrödinger. Born statistics are treated as an empirical constraint from which the physical role of the wave function is reconsidered. We propose that, for the single-particle regime examined here, the wave function may be interpreted functionally as a dynamical propagation structure rather than as the localized particle itself. Its amplitude, phase, conserved current, gauge-covariant propagation momentum, and associated velocity field jointly define a structured family of possible motions. This interpretation leads to three separations: propagation from localization, propagation from physical population, and arrival from detector registration. A physical preparation generates a source measure (\mu_0^{\rm phys}); Schrödinger dynamics generates a propagation map (\Phi_\Psi); and microscopic detector dynamics is represented by a response map (\mathcal R_D). The Born problem can then be formulated as the closure condition RD[(ΦΨ)∗μ0phys]=?μBorn,D. This relation is not claimed here as a derived law, but as the central dynamical problem that a physical reconstruction of quantum probability must solve without inserting the Born measure at either boundary. The paper synthesizes six preceding studies on wave-packet localization, Born's scattering interpretation, the emergence of probability, the physical meaning of the wave function, source-to-detector transport, and unified propagation dynamics. It places the resulting framework in dialogue with Madelung and Hamilton–Jacobi formulations, Bohmian mechanics, decoherence, Quantum Darwinism, structural and symmetry-based derivations of the Born rule, Everettian approaches, objective-collapse theories, and detector models. The resulting proposal is best understood as a propagation-first theoretical reconstruction program: Schrödinger dynamics organizes possible propagation, while Born statistics constrain how that propagation becomes physically realized. Keywords: Schrödinger equation; Born rule; wave function; quantum foundations; propagation structure; quantum probability; quantum trajectories; source-to-detector transport; detector response; wave–particle duality; Bohmian mechanics; quantum measurement