Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of Physics

Bouncing wave packets, Ehrenfest theorem, and uncertainty relation based upon a new concept for the momentum of a particle in a box

I. Albrecht, Joachım Herrmann, A. Mariani, U.‐J. Wiese, V. Wyss

Published Mar 22, 2023• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

For a particle in a box, the operator −i∂x is not self-adjoint and thus does not qualify as the physical momentum. As a result, in general the Ehrenfest theorem is violated. Based upon a recently developed new concept for a self-adjoint momentum operator, we reconsider the theorem and find that it is now indeed satisfied for all physically admissible boundary conditions. We illustrate these results for bouncing wave packets which first spread, then shrink, and return to their original form after a certain revival time. We derive a very simple form of the general Heisenberg–Robertson–Schrödinger uncertainty relation and show that our construction also provides a physical interpretation for it.

DOI
10.1016/j.aop.2023.169289

Related papers

Bouncing Wave Packets, Ehrenfest Theorem, and Uncertainty Relation based upon a new Concept for the Momentum of a Particle in a Box

I. Albrecht, J. Herrmann, A. Mariani +2 more

For a particle in a box, the operator $-i\partial_x$ is not self-adjoint and thus does not qualify as the physical momentum. As a result, in general the Ehrenfest theorem is violated. Based upon a recently developed new concept for a self-adjoint momentum operator, we reconsider the theorem and find that it is now indeed satisfied for all physically admissible boundary conditions. We illustrate these results for bouncing wave packets which first spread, then shrink, and return to their original form after a certain revival time. We derive a very simple form of the general Heisenberg-Robertson-Schrödinger uncertainty relation and show that our construction also provides a physical interpretation for it.

arXiv:2206.07531•Jun 15, 2022•1 citation

Self-adjoint Momentum Operator for a Particle Confined in a Multi-Dimensional Cavity

A. Mariani, U.‐J. Wiese

Based on the recent construction of a self-adjoint momentum operator for a particle confined in a one-dimensional interval, we extend the construction to arbitrarily shaped regions in any number of dimensions. Different components of the momentum vector do not commute with each other unless very special conditions are met. As such, momentum measurements should be considered one direction at a time. We also extend other results, such as the Ehrenfest theorem and the interpretation of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation to higher dimensions.

arXiv:2309.07818•Sep 14, 2023•0 citations

Self-adjoint momentum operator for a particle confined in a multi-dimensional cavity

A. Mariani, U.‐J. Wiese

Based on the recent construction of a self-adjoint momentum operator for a particle confined in a one-dimensional interval, we extend the construction to arbitrarily shaped regions in any number of dimensions. Different components of the momentum vector do not commute with each other unless very special conditions are met. As such, momentum measurements should be considered one direction at a time. We also extend other results, such as the Ehrenfest theorem and the interpretation of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation to higher dimensions.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 2024•3 citations

Heisenberg's wave packet reconsidered

J. Orlin Grabbe

This note shows that Heisenberg's choice for a wave function in his original paper on the uncertainty principle is simply a renormalized characteristic function of a stable distribution with certain restrictions on the parameters. Relaxing Heisenberg's restrictions leads to a more general formulation of the uncertainty principle. This reformulation shows quantum uncertainty can exist at a macroscopic level. These modifications also give rise to a new form of Schrodinger's wave equation as the equation of a vibrating string. Although a heat equation version can also be given, the latter shows the traditional formulation of Schrodinger's equation involves a hidden Cauchy amplitude assumption.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509045•Sep 7, 2005•1 citation

Impulsive forces and the Heisenberg equations of motion for a particle in a box

W. A. Atkinson, Mohsen Razavy

The quantum mechanical problem of a particle bouncing between two walls is formulated both in terms of the Heisenberg equations of motion and the Schrödinger equation. The reason for considering the Heisenberg equations is to understand the quantal nature of the impulsive forces. It is shown that these two formulations are compatible if, in addition to the classical impulsive forces, there are singular forces proportional to [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], i.e., forces of quantum origin. When these forces are added to the free-particle Hamiltonian then the total Hamiltonian is self-adjoint, and from it one can derive the boundary condition that must be imposed on the wave function. As an application of this formulation one can study the quantum mechanics of classical dynamical systems expressible as difference equations, e.g., the problem of a particle trapped between two walls moving relative to each other. The total Hamiltonian can also be used to study the question of the separability of the wave equation for such a motion.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 1993•5 citations

A New Concept for the Momentum of a Quantum Mechanical Particle in a Box

M.H. Al-Hashimi, U.‐J. Wiese

For a particle in a box, the operator $- i \partial_x$ is not Hermitean. We provide an alternative construction of a momentum operator $p = p_R + i p_I$, which has a Hermitean component $p_R$ that can be extended to a self-adjoint operator, as well as an anti-Hermitean component $i p_I$. This leads to a description of momentum measurements performed on a particle that is strictly limited to the interior of a box.

arXiv:2012.09596•Dec 17, 2020•1 citation
For a particle in a box, the operator −i∂x is not self-adjoint and thus does not qualify as the physical momentum. As a result, in general the Ehrenfest theorem is violated. Based upon a recently developed new concept for a self-adjoint momentum operator, we reconsider the theorem and find that it is now indeed satisfied for all physically admissible boundary conditions. We illustrate these results for bouncing wave packets which first spread, then shrink, and return to their original form after a certain revival time. We derive a very simple form of the general Heisenberg–Robertson–Schrödinger uncertainty relation and show that our construction also provides a physical interpretation for it.
For a particle in a box, the operator −i∂x-i\partial_x−i∂x​ is not self-adjoint and thus does not qualify as the physical momentum. As a result, in general the Ehrenfest theorem is violated. Based upon a recently developed new concept for a self-adjoint momentum operator, we reconsider the theorem and find that it is now indeed satisfied for all physically admissible boundary conditions. We illustrate these results for bouncing wave packets which first spread, then shrink, and return to their original form after a certain revival time. We derive a very simple form of the general Heisenberg-Robertson-Schrödinger uncertainty relation and show that our construction also provides a physical interpretation for it.
Based on the recent construction of a self-adjoint momentum operator for a particle confined in a one-dimensional interval, we extend the construction to arbitrarily shaped regions in any number of dimensions. Different components of the momentum vector do not commute with each other unless very special conditions are met. As such, momentum measurements should be considered one direction at a time. We also extend other results, such as the Ehrenfest theorem and the interpretation of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation to higher dimensions.
Based on the recent construction of a self-adjoint momentum operator for a particle confined in a one-dimensional interval, we extend the construction to arbitrarily shaped regions in any number of dimensions. Different components of the momentum vector do not commute with each other unless very special conditions are met. As such, momentum measurements should be considered one direction at a time. We also extend other results, such as the Ehrenfest theorem and the interpretation of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation to higher dimensions.
This note shows that Heisenberg's choice for a wave function in his original paper on the uncertainty principle is simply a renormalized characteristic function of a stable distribution with certain restrictions on the parameters. Relaxing Heisenberg's restrictions leads to a more general formulation of the uncertainty principle. This reformulation shows quantum uncertainty can exist at a macroscopic level. These modifications also give rise to a new form of Schrodinger's wave equation as the equation of a vibrating string. Although a heat equation version can also be given, the latter shows the traditional formulation of Schrodinger's equation involves a hidden Cauchy amplitude assumption.
The quantum mechanical problem of a particle bouncing between two walls is formulated both in terms of the Heisenberg equations of motion and the Schrödinger equation. The reason for considering the Heisenberg equations is to understand the quantal nature of the impulsive forces. It is shown that these two formulations are compatible if, in addition to the classical impulsive forces, there are singular forces proportional to [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], i.e., forces of quantum origin. When these forces are added to the free-particle Hamiltonian then the total Hamiltonian is self-adjoint, and from it one can derive the boundary condition that must be imposed on the wave function. As an application of this formulation one can study the quantum mechanics of classical dynamical systems expressible as difference equations, e.g., the problem of a particle trapped between two walls moving relative to each other. The total Hamiltonian can also be used to study the question of the separability of the wave equation for such a motion.
For a particle in a box, the operator −i∂x- i \partial_x−i∂x​ is not Hermitean. We provide an alternative construction of a momentum operator p=pR+ipIp = p_R + i p_Ip=pR​+ipI​, which has a Hermitean component pRp_RpR​ that can be extended to a self-adjoint operator, as well as an anti-Hermitean component ipIi p_IipI​. This leads to a description of momentum measurements performed on a particle that is strictly limited to the interior of a box.