We use our interpretation of homodyne and heterodyne detection of squeezed states, viz., quantum correlation between photons as expressed in second-order correlation functions, to study various cases. In particular, we introduce the coherence time of the local oscillator and show its influence on the possible noise reduction. We also study the case in which the local oscillator is not much stronger than the squeezed state and analyze the influence of phase jitter. This approach could explain some experimental results and suggest improvements in detection schemes.
We show that optical homodyne measurements of coherent states, and of superpositions of coherent states, can be described using the joint photon-number distribution for entangled coherent states. The quadrature-phase distribution interference fringes for superpositions of macroscopically distinct coherent states (the so-called ``Schr\"odinger cat states'') are shown to arise from interference in the photon-number distribution for entangled coherent states. The entangled squeezed states are introduced here as squeezed superposition states which are optically mixed with an antisqueezed coherent local oscillator field (squeezing in the other quadrature) at a beam splitter, and we discuss the connection between entangled squeezed states and squeezed-state homodyne detection of squeezed light. Finally the relationship between interference in phase space and fringes in the joint photon-number distribution for the entangled squeezed state is explored.
Measurement of the squeezed fluctuations of an optical field by the method of conditional homodyne detection is discussed. It is shown that conditional homodyne detection is able to distinguish qualitatively between vacuum-state squeezing and squeezed classical noise. Whereas for conventional squeezed-light detection, only a quantitative distinction can be made, based on the setting of the shot-noise level, under conditional detection, the presence of classical noise changes the actual shape of the measured correlation function. The correlations show a positive peak due to the unsqeezed classical noise frequencies, set inside the negative dip associated with the squeezed fluctuations. The width in time of the positive peak is the larger of the detector response time and the inverse of the classical noise bandwidth. The fundamental distinction between vacuum-state squeezing and squeezed classical noise is that there is no positive peak, even in the limiting form of a delta-function, when the unsqueezed frequencies correspond to vacuum state modes. Implications for the literal interpretation of vacuum fluctuations, such as is adopted in stochastic electrodynamics, are discussed. The ideas are presented in general terms and illustrated by an example which treats the generation and detection of broadband squeezed light, including finite-bandwidth classical noise, within the framework of the quantum trajectory theory of cascaded open systems.
The theory of balanced homodyne and heterodyne detection is developed for inputs in which the signal field is in an arbitrary quantum state and the local-oscillator field is in a highly excited coherent state. Exact expressions are derived for the photocount moment-generating functions in the special case of a coherent signal. For more general signals, the first two moments of the photocount probability distribution are determined. The moments are evaluated for the examples of a coherent signal with a chaotic noise component, and for squeezed light derived from a degenerate and from a non-degenerate parametric amplifier. The corresponding moments for direct detection are obtained so that comparisons can be made. The Kelley-Kleiner photocount distribution formula is adapted to balanced detection schemes. Light beams are characterized throughout by their energy fluxes, and the theory accordingly describes steady-state experiments.
Neural networks can identify an optical quantum state from an image of its phase-space function, but a real measurement gives a finite record of
N detection events. Heterodyne detection samples the Husimi
Q function directly, whereas homodyne detection gives the Wigner function only after a reconstruction from several phases. We ask which scheme better identifies one of seven families of states, including Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states, under loss, dephasing and Gaussian noise. We simulate finite records on identical states for two sets of families, one with equal mean photon number and one built from the code of Ahmed et al. For convolutional networks, heterodyne detection outperforms homodyne detection with filtered back-projection by 14.1 percentage points at
N=100 events and 20% dephasing in the first set (adjusted
p=0.003 over
24 cells across training runs), and it depends on the number of phases and on the reconstruction. At
N=103 and
104 no difference is significant, but the intervals are wide. At
N=100, a homodyne network without reconstruction does not differ significantly from heterodyne detection in the first set and is nominally worse in the second. Near thermal states we show to leading order that heterodyne detection damps phase-space structure of order
n exponentially, whereas homodyne detection shares unit weight among
n+1 angular components, a local result that does not explain the finite-record differences. Experimental records of a GKP state, photon-subtracted squeezed states and one mode of an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen source are classified like simulated ones, but these low-power tests probe our counting-noise model, not the seven-class accuracy. A likelihood-ratio observer shows no such gap at
N=100, so our evidence concerns a reconstruction-based pipeline, not homodyne detection in general.