Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Towards a Set Theoretic Axiomatization of Quantum Theory and Related Topics

B. Serifo Balde

Published Oct 1, 2009• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Motivated by Hilbert's sixth problem on axiomatization of physics, the author is proposing a rather provocative abstract axiomatic framework called S - formalization, where S is an arbitrary physical system .The proposal is an attempt to provide a general axiomatic framework , from which mathematical frameworks of new physical theories can be formulated on firm axiomatic basis and the mathematical frameworks of subjects such as standard (nonrelativistic) quantum mechanics are naturally derived as special cases of this general axiomatic framework. Introduction

Related papers

Physical axiomatics

A. R. Marlow

An axiomatic mathematical structure is presented in terms of which arbitrary mathematical models of a physical system can be rigorously formulated and studied. Physical systems, observables, and states all arise in a natural way from the primitive notion of a physical operation. In particular, the structure is independent of the special mathematical completion defined by the quantum mechanical model, since no lattice theoretical or Hilbert space assumptions are used. The precise relationship between the present structure and the usual quantum mechanical model is investigated in a succeeding paper.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 1974•1 citation

Axiomatic Foundations of Quantum Theories

M. Guenin

A formalism is developed on an axiomatic basis and is shown to contain as special cases classical mechanics, the usual quantum mechanics, as well as the quantum theory of systems with continuous superselection rules. The structure of the symmetries of a general physical theory is studied and a classification of observables is exhibited.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 1966•24 citations

An Attempt to Understand Relational Quantum Mechanics

PEKKA J. LAHTI, Juha-Pekka Pellonpää

Abstract We search for a possible mathematical formulation of some of the key ideas of the relational interpretation of quantum mechanics and study their consequences. We also briefly overview some proposals of relational quantum mechanics for an axiomatic reconstruction of the Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2207.01380•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Aug 3, 2023•2 citations

Representation of state property systems

Diederik Aerts, Sylvia Pulmannová

A ‘state property system’ is the mathematical structure which models an arbitrary physical system by means of its set of states, its set of properties, and a relation of ‘actuality of a certain property for a certain state’. We work out a new axiomatization for standard quantum mechanics, starting with the basic notion of state property system, and making use of a generalization of the standard quantum mechanical notion of ‘superposition’ for state property systems.

•Jan 1, 2006•3 citations

Representation of state property systems

Diederik Aerts, S. Pulmannová

A “state property system” is the mathematical structure which models an arbitrary physical system by means of its set of states, its set of properties, and a relation of “actuality of a certain property for a certain state.” We work out a new axiomatization for standard quantum mechanics, starting with the basic notion of state property system, and making use of a generalization of the standard quantum mechanical notion of “superposition” for state property systems.

arXiv:0811.2526•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 2006•3 citations

Quantum mechanics

Peter Szekeres

Our purpose in this chapter is to present the key concepts of quantum mechanics in the language of Hilbert spaces. The reader who has not previously met the physical ideas motivating quantum mechanics, and some of the more elementary applications of Schrödinger's equation, is encouraged to read any of a number of excellent texts on the subject such as [1–4]. Otherwise, the statements given here must to a large extent be taken on trust – not an altogether easy thing to do, since the basic assertions of quantum theory are frequently counterintuitive to anyone steeped in the classical view of physics. Quantum mechanics is frequently presented in the form of several postulates, as though it were an axiomatic system such as Euclidean geometry. As often presented, these postulates may not meet the standards of mathematical rigour required for a strictly logical set of axioms, so that little is gained by such an approach. We will do things a little more informally here. For those only interested in the mathematical aspects of quantum mechanics and the role of Hilbert space see [5–8]. Many of the standard applications, such as the hydrogen atom, will be omitted here as they can be found in all standard textbooks, and we leave aside the enormous topic of measurement theory and interpretations of quantum mechanics. This is not to say that we need be totally comfortable with quantum theory as it stands. Undoubtedly, there are some philosophically disquieting features in the theory, often expressed in the form of socalled paradoxes.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 16, 2004•0 citations
Motivated by Hilbert's sixth problem on axiomatization of physics, the author is proposing a rather provocative abstract axiomatic framework called S - formalization, where S is an arbitrary physical system .The proposal is an attempt to provide a general axiomatic framework , from which mathematical frameworks of new physical theories can be formulated on firm axiomatic basis and the mathematical frameworks of subjects such as standard (nonrelativistic) quantum mechanics are naturally derived as special cases of this general axiomatic framework. Introduction
An axiomatic mathematical structure is presented in terms of which arbitrary mathematical models of a physical system can be rigorously formulated and studied. Physical systems, observables, and states all arise in a natural way from the primitive notion of a physical operation. In particular, the structure is independent of the special mathematical completion defined by the quantum mechanical model, since no lattice theoretical or Hilbert space assumptions are used. The precise relationship between the present structure and the usual quantum mechanical model is investigated in a succeeding paper.
Our purpose in this chapter is to present the key concepts of quantum mechanics in the language of Hilbert spaces. The reader who has not previously met the physical ideas motivating quantum mechanics, and some of the more elementary applications of Schrödinger's equation, is encouraged to read any of a number of excellent texts on the subject such as [1–4]. Otherwise, the statements given here must to a large extent be taken on trust – not an altogether easy thing to do, since the basic assertions of quantum theory are frequently counterintuitive to anyone steeped in the classical view of physics. Quantum mechanics is frequently presented in the form of several postulates, as though it were an axiomatic system such as Euclidean geometry. As often presented, these postulates may not meet the standards of mathematical rigour required for a strictly logical set of axioms, so that little is gained by such an approach. We will do things a little more informally here. For those only interested in the mathematical aspects of quantum mechanics and the role of Hilbert space see [5–8]. Many of the standard applications, such as the hydrogen atom, will be omitted here as they can be found in all standard textbooks, and we leave aside the enormous topic of measurement theory and interpretations of quantum mechanics. This is not to say that we need be totally comfortable with quantum theory as it stands. Undoubtedly, there are some philosophically disquieting features in the theory, often expressed in the form of socalled paradoxes.