Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Noise And Measuring Quantum Distance For NISQ Circuits

Sakibul Islam Sazzad, Protik Nag

Published Dec 30, 2022• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this article, we analyzed the performance of several classes of quantum circuits under various errors. We executed NISQ circuits on both noisy simulator and real hardware backend publicly available from IBM Quantum. On simulation, we created noise models with both individual errors and combination of multiple errors to quantify how each type of error impact performance of quantum circuits. We utilized statistical distances such as total variation distance (TVD), Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD), and Hellinger distance, to measure the deviation of noisy output from ideal output. Finally, we compare the noisy outputs from the simulator and outputs from the real hardware to showcase the gap between simulation and real device experiment. This gap points to the limitation of present noise models failure to exhibit the behavior of real hardware.

DOI
10.36227/techrxiv.21791987

Related papers

Quantum Noise And Measuring Quantum Distance For NISQ Circuits

Sakibul Islam Sazzad, Protik Nag

In this article, we analyzed the performance of several classes of quantum circuits under various errors. We executed NISQ circuits on both noisy simulator and real hardware backend publicly available from IBM Quantum. On simulation, we created noise models with both individual errors and combination of multiple errors to quantify how each type of error impact performance of quantum circuits. We utilized statistical distances such as total variation distance (TVD), Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD), and Hellinger distance, to measure the deviation of noisy output from ideal output. Finally, we compare the noisy outputs from the simulator and outputs from the real hardware to showcase the gap between simulation and real device experiment. This gap points to the limitation of present noise models failure to exhibit the behavior of real hardware.

•Dec 30, 2022•1 citation

Practical Guide to Quantum Computing: Building Noise Models with IBM Quantum Simulators # 4

Mikhail Pavlov

Abstract This practical guide presents methods for constructing noise models using the Qiskit Aer noise module within the IBM Q ecosystem. The objective is to simulate quantum circuits under realistic error conditions, enabling accurate emulation of noisy quantum processors. The guide demonstrates how to: Use the Qiskit Aer noise module to define custom noise models. Incorporate gate errors, readout errors, and decoherence effects into simulations. Apply noise channels (e.g., depolarizing, amplitude damping, phase damping). Attach noise models to quantum circuit simulations. Analyze how noise affects algorithm performance and output distributions. Building noise models is essential for studying the behavior of quantum algorithms in the NISQ (Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum) era. It allows researchers to evaluate algorithm robustness, optimize circuit depth, and test error mitigation strategies before execution on real IBM Quantum hardware. This approach provides a bridge between ideal theoretical circuits and physically realistic quantum devices, enhancing the reliability and applicability of quantum computing experiments.

•Mar 4, 2026•0 citations

Operational Quantum Average-Case Distances

Filip B. Maciejewski, Zbigniew Puchała, Michał Oszmaniec

We introduce distance measures between quantum states, measurements, and channels based on their statistical distinguishability in generic experiments. Specifically, we analyze the average Total Variation Distance (TVD) between output statistics of protocols in which quantum objects are intertwined with random circuits and measured in standard basis. We show that for circuits forming approximate 4-designs, the average TVDs can be approximated by simple explicit functions of the underlying objects – the average-case distances (ACDs). We apply them to analyze the effects of noise in quantum advantage experiments and for efficient discrimination of high-dimensional states and channels without quantum memory. We argue that ACDs are better suited for assessing the quality of NISQ devices than common distance measures such as trace distance or the diamond norm.

arXiv:2112.14283•Quantum•Sep 11, 2023•8 citations

Quantum Errors Analysis of a Superconducting Quantum Processor

Jawwad Farooq, Ekram Khan

Quantum devices in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era are highly susceptible to different types of quantum noise, which directly impact the reliability of experimental results. This work provides a characterization of error behavior arising from quantum noises on IBM's superconducting quantum processor, offering practical insights for algorithm design, benchmarking, and error-mitigation strategies on a real superconducting quantum processor in the NISQ era. The study begins with the measurement of the basis state, without applying any gate, to quantify state-preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. Additionally, the errors are further quantified due to the application of single-qubit Pauli-X, two-qubit CNOT gate and other multi-qubit Controlled-X gates. Each circuit was executed with 1024 shots, and the percentage error between the expected and observed outputs was computed. The results show that the single-qubit Pauli-X gate exhibits relatively low errors in comparison with the two-qubit CNOT gate, whereas other multi-qubit Controlled-X gates lead to significantly higher deviations. This work also analyzes the noise effect of a fourqubit Controlled-X gate being implemented using a three-qubit Controlled-X gate with an extra auxiliary qubit, and the result shows a significant reduction in the error rate.

International Conference on Multimedia, Signal Processing and Communication Technologies (IMPACT)•Feb 14, 2026•0 citations

Constructing and Benchmarking Noise Models for Quantum Computing

Tom Weber

Context: The main obstacle of quantum computing on its way to scalability is the noisy nature of current hardware. Various types of errors lead to incorrect computational results,and measures such as quantum error mitigation are needed to counteract these errors. Many error mitigation techniques require a thorough understanding of the noise and its impact on computations. Therefore, accurate noise models are indispensable to facilitate meaningful quantum computing in the near future. They also enable realistic simulations of quantum devices. Since these devices are currently limited and quantum computing is expensive, researchers typically rely on simulations for testing their algorithms.Objective: In this thesis, we aim to construct a realistic noise model for quantum computing and optimise its model parameters. The model construction should build on the underlying physical processes, and the number of parameters should scale well with the system size. We also address the evaluation and comparison of different noise models by benchmarks using quantum circuits specific to real-world applications. Finally, we aim to develop useful graphical representations of noise models based on the existing quantum circuit model.Method: We present a benchmarking framework for quantum computing noise models and evaluate it based on benchmarking quality attributes from the literature. Moreover, we construct a quantum computing noise model and develop a training procedure for its parameters. We analyse the parameters of the trained noise model and the impact ofdifferent types of errors on computations. We benchmark the noise model with the above approach and compare it to a noise model provided by IBM’s software development kit Qiskit. Finally, we develop an extension of the quantum circuit model to represent noise channels.Result: The benchmarks performed in this thesis show that our noise model predicts noisy hardware behaviour of IBM’s ibmq_manila quantum device equally well as the Qiskit model, if not better, based on quantum circuits commonly used for variational quantum algorithms. Within the trained noise model, readout error has the most detrimental impact on computations. Our benchmarking approach satisfies relevant quality criteria by choosing suitable quantum circuits and objective functions to compare model predictionsto hardware data. Moreover, the quantum circuit model can be extended meaningfully by noise channels.Conclusion: Our benchmarking approach is suitable for evaluating and comparing quantum computing noise models. In future work, volumetric benchmarks should be performed for various noise models and application contexts. The parameter optimisation based on learning with training circuits yields accurate noise models and shows the importance of mitigating measurement error. Different optimisation algorithms and quantum circuits should be explored, and more types of noise should be incorporated into the noise model.

•Jan 12, 2026•0 citations

Stability of noisy quantum computing devices

Samudra Dasgupta, Travis S. Humble

Noisy, intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing devices offer opportunities to test the principles of quantum computing but are prone to errors arising from various sources of noise. Fluctuations in the noise itself lead to unstable devices that undermine the reproducibility of NISQ results. Here we characterize the reliability of NISQ devices by quantifying the stability of essential performance metrics. Using the Hellinger distance, we quantify the similarity between experimental characterizations of several NISQ devices by comparing gate fidelities, duty cycles, and register addressability across temporal and spatial scales. Our observations collected over 22 months reveal large fluctuations in each metric that underscore the limited scales on which current NISQ devices may be considered reliable.

arXiv:2105.09472•May 20, 2021•17 citations
In this article, we analyzed the performance of several classes of quantum circuits under various errors. We executed NISQ circuits on both noisy simulator and real hardware backend publicly available from IBM Quantum. On simulation, we created noise models with both individual errors and combination of multiple errors to quantify how each type of error impact performance of quantum circuits. We utilized statistical distances such as total variation distance (TVD), Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD), and Hellinger distance, to measure the deviation of noisy output from ideal output. Finally, we compare the noisy outputs from the simulator and outputs from the real hardware to showcase the gap between simulation and real device experiment. This gap points to the limitation of present noise models failure to exhibit the behavior of real hardware.
In this article, we analyzed the performance of several classes of quantum circuits under various errors. We executed NISQ circuits on both noisy simulator and real hardware backend publicly available from IBM Quantum. On simulation, we created noise models with both individual errors and combination of multiple errors to quantify how each type of error impact performance of quantum circuits. We utilized statistical distances such as total variation distance (TVD), Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD), and Hellinger distance, to measure the deviation of noisy output from ideal output. Finally, we compare the noisy outputs from the simulator and outputs from the real hardware to showcase the gap between simulation and real device experiment. This gap points to the limitation of present noise models failure to exhibit the behavior of real hardware.
Abstract This practical guide presents methods for constructing noise models using the Qiskit Aer noise module within the IBM Q ecosystem. The objective is to simulate quantum circuits under realistic error conditions, enabling accurate emulation of noisy quantum processors. The guide demonstrates how to: Use the Qiskit Aer noise module to define custom noise models. Incorporate gate errors, readout errors, and decoherence effects into simulations. Apply noise channels (e.g., depolarizing, amplitude damping, phase damping). Attach noise models to quantum circuit simulations. Analyze how noise affects algorithm performance and output distributions. Building noise models is essential for studying the behavior of quantum algorithms in the NISQ (Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum) era. It allows researchers to evaluate algorithm robustness, optimize circuit depth, and test error mitigation strategies before execution on real IBM Quantum hardware. This approach provides a bridge between ideal theoretical circuits and physically realistic quantum devices, enhancing the reliability and applicability of quantum computing experiments.
We introduce distance measures between quantum states, measurements, and channels based on their statistical distinguishability in generic experiments. Specifically, we analyze the average Total Variation Distance (TVD) between output statistics of protocols in which quantum objects are intertwined with random circuits and measured in standard basis. We show that for circuits forming approximate 4-designs, the average TVDs can be approximated by simple explicit functions of the underlying objects – the average-case distances (ACDs). We apply them to analyze the effects of noise in quantum advantage experiments and for efficient discrimination of high-dimensional states and channels without quantum memory. We argue that ACDs are better suited for assessing the quality of NISQ devices than common distance measures such as trace distance or the diamond norm.
Quantum devices in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era are highly susceptible to different types of quantum noise, which directly impact the reliability of experimental results. This work provides a characterization of error behavior arising from quantum noises on IBM's superconducting quantum processor, offering practical insights for algorithm design, benchmarking, and error-mitigation strategies on a real superconducting quantum processor in the NISQ era. The study begins with the measurement of the basis state, without applying any gate, to quantify state-preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. Additionally, the errors are further quantified due to the application of single-qubit Pauli-X, two-qubit CNOT gate and other multi-qubit Controlled-X gates. Each circuit was executed with 1024 shots, and the percentage error between the expected and observed outputs was computed. The results show that the single-qubit Pauli-X gate exhibits relatively low errors in comparison with the two-qubit CNOT gate, whereas other multi-qubit Controlled-X gates lead to significantly higher deviations. This work also analyzes the noise effect of a fourqubit Controlled-X gate being implemented using a three-qubit Controlled-X gate with an extra auxiliary qubit, and the result shows a significant reduction in the error rate.
Context: The main obstacle of quantum computing on its way to scalability is the noisy nature of current hardware. Various types of errors lead to incorrect computational results,and measures such as quantum error mitigation are needed to counteract these errors. Many error mitigation techniques require a thorough understanding of the noise and its impact on computations. Therefore, accurate noise models are indispensable to facilitate meaningful quantum computing in the near future. They also enable realistic simulations of quantum devices. Since these devices are currently limited and quantum computing is expensive, researchers typically rely on simulations for testing their algorithms.Objective: In this thesis, we aim to construct a realistic noise model for quantum computing and optimise its model parameters. The model construction should build on the underlying physical processes, and the number of parameters should scale well with the system size. We also address the evaluation and comparison of different noise models by benchmarks using quantum circuits specific to real-world applications. Finally, we aim to develop useful graphical representations of noise models based on the existing quantum circuit model.Method: We present a benchmarking framework for quantum computing noise models and evaluate it based on benchmarking quality attributes from the literature. Moreover, we construct a quantum computing noise model and develop a training procedure for its parameters. We analyse the parameters of the trained noise model and the impact ofdifferent types of errors on computations. We benchmark the noise model with the above approach and compare it to a noise model provided by IBM’s software development kit Qiskit. Finally, we develop an extension of the quantum circuit model to represent noise channels.Result: The benchmarks performed in this thesis show that our noise model predicts noisy hardware behaviour of IBM’s ibmq_manila quantum device equally well as the Qiskit model, if not better, based on quantum circuits commonly used for variational quantum algorithms. Within the trained noise model, readout error has the most detrimental impact on computations. Our benchmarking approach satisfies relevant quality criteria by choosing suitable quantum circuits and objective functions to compare model predictionsto hardware data. Moreover, the quantum circuit model can be extended meaningfully by noise channels.Conclusion: Our benchmarking approach is suitable for evaluating and comparing quantum computing noise models. In future work, volumetric benchmarks should be performed for various noise models and application contexts. The parameter optimisation based on learning with training circuits yields accurate noise models and shows the importance of mitigating measurement error. Different optimisation algorithms and quantum circuits should be explored, and more types of noise should be incorporated into the noise model.
Noisy, intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing devices offer opportunities to test the principles of quantum computing but are prone to errors arising from various sources of noise. Fluctuations in the noise itself lead to unstable devices that undermine the reproducibility of NISQ results. Here we characterize the reliability of NISQ devices by quantifying the stability of essential performance metrics. Using the Hellinger distance, we quantify the similarity between experimental characterizations of several NISQ devices by comparing gate fidelities, duty cycles, and register addressability across temporal and spatial scales. Our observations collected over 22 months reveal large fluctuations in each metric that underscore the limited scales on which current NISQ devices may be considered reliable.