Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

University of Chicago Press eBooks

13. Bohr and the “Copenhagen Orthodoxy”

Slobodan Perović

Published Jan 1, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.7208/chicago/9780226798479.003.0013

Related papers

Physics in the Making in Bohr's Copenhagen

A. Pais

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1989•0 citations

Physics in the Making in Bohr's Copenhagen

A. Pais

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1989•0 citations

The Bohr and Einstein Debate: Copenhagen Interpretation Challenged

Rochelle Forrester

•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

4. Bohr, Heisenberg, and What Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen Tries to Tell Us

Gerald Holton

Harvard University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 2005•0 citations

Bohr, Heisenberg, and What Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen Tries to Tell Us

Gerald Holton

Harvard University Press eBooks•May 30, 2005•0 citations

Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation

Kristian Camilleri

According to the standard view, the so-called ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of quantum mechanics originated in discussions between Bohr and Heisenberg in 1927, and was defended by Bohr in his classic debate with Einstein. Yet recent scholarship has shown Bohr's views were never widely accepted, let alone properly understood, by his contemporaries, many of whom held divergent views of the ‘Copenhagen orthodoxy’. This paper examines how the ‘myth of the Copenhagen interpretation’ was constructed by situating it in the context of Soviet Marxist critique of quantum mechanics in the 1950s and the response by physicists such as Heisenberg and Rosenfeld.

Perspectives on Science•Jan 29, 2009•111 citations
According to the standard view, the so-called ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of quantum mechanics originated in discussions between Bohr and Heisenberg in 1927, and was defended by Bohr in his classic debate with Einstein. Yet recent scholarship has shown Bohr's views were never widely accepted, let alone properly understood, by his contemporaries, many of whom held divergent views of the ‘Copenhagen orthodoxy’. This paper examines how the ‘myth of the Copenhagen interpretation’ was constructed by situating it in the context of Soviet Marxist critique of quantum mechanics in the 1950s and the response by physicists such as Heisenberg and Rosenfeld.