The growth of the need for quantum computers in many domains such as machine learning, numerical scientific simulation, and finance has urged quantum computers to produce more stable and less error-prone results. However, mitigating the impact of the noise inside each quantum device remains a present challenge. This paper utilizes the system calibration data collected from the existing IBMQ machines, applying reliability degradation analysis to generate the reliability degradation matrix (RDM). We define multiple new evaluation metrics based on the reliability degradation matrix to compare the reliability between qubits, qubit topologies, and quantum machines. New evaluation metrics can be used for exploring the most error-robust quantum machine. This contribution increases the users’ expectation of result accuracy. It opens the opportunities for studying the insight of correlation between qubits that may further motivate the quantum compiler design for the qubit mapping.
The growth of the need for quantum computers in many domains such as machine learning, numerical scientific simulation, and finance has urged quantum computers to produce more stable and less error-prone results. However, mitigating the impact of the noise inside each quantum device remains a present challenge. This paper utilizes the system calibration data collected from the existing IBMQ machines, applying reliability degradation analysis to generate the reliability degradation matrix (RDM). We define multiple new evaluation metrics based on the reliability degradation matrix to compare the reliability between qubits, qubit topologies, and quantum machines. New evaluation metrics can be used for exploring the most error-robust quantum machine. This contribution increases the users’ expectation of result accuracy. It opens the opportunities for studying the insight of correlation between qubits that may further motivate the quantum compiler design for the qubit mapping.
The growth of need of quantum computers in many domains such as machine learning, numerical scientific simulation and finance has urged the quantum computers to produce more stable and less error-prone results. However, to mitigate the impact of the noise inside each quantum device remains a present challenge. In this paper, we investigate the temporal behavior of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computer errors based on calibration data and the characteristics of individual devices. In particular, we collect calibration data of IBM-Q machines over 90 days and compare the quantum error robustness across processor types, quantum topology and quantum volumes. We analyze the aging effect by comparing the quantum error data from four IBM quantum computers during 2019-2021 showing that only one computer experienced significant error growth overtime. In this study, we simply analyze the collected data and run temporal test analysis to observe the behaviour of IBM-Q computers.
Over the last couple of years, Quantum Computing (QC) has captured the interest of computer scientists due to the fact of quantum speedup, the possibility of solving NPhard problems, and achieving higher compute power. However, mitigating the impact of the noise inside each quantum device presents an immediate challenge. These changes open up new opportunities to investigate the effect of calibration parameters for individual characteristics of each qubit in a manner of time. In this paper, we investigate the temporal behavior of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computers based on calibration data and the characteristics of individual devices. In particular, we collect calibration data of IBM-Q machines over the last two years and compare the quantum error robustness against the processor types, quantum topology, and quantum volumes of the IBM-Q machines.
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices are valuable platforms for testing the tenets of quantum computing, but these devices are susceptible to errors arising from de-coherence, leakage, cross-talk, and other sources of noise. This raises concerns regarding the stability of results when using NISQ devices since strategies for mitigating errors generally require well-characterized and stationary error models. Here, we quantify the reliability of NISQ devices by assessing the necessary conditions for generating stable results within a given tolerance. We use similarity metrics derived from device characterization data to derive and validate bounds on the stability of a 5-qubit implementation of the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm. Simulation experiments conducted with noise data from IBM washington, spanning January 2022 to April 2023, revealed that the reliability metric fluctuated between 41% and 92%. This variation significantly surpasses the maximum allowable threshold of 2.2% needed for stable outcomes. Consequently, the device proved unreliable for consistently reproducing the statistical mean in the context of the Bernstein-Vazirani circuit.
The current advancement in quantum computers has been focusing on increasing the number of qubits and enhancing their fidelity. However, the available quantum devices, known as intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) computers, still suffer from different sources of noise that impact their reliability. Thus, practical noise modeling is of great importance in the development of quantum error mitigation approaches. In this article, we propose a machine learning (ML)-based scheme to predict the output fidelity of the quantum circuit executed on NISQ devices. We show the benefit of using graph neural network (GNN)-based models compared to traditional ML-based models in capturing the quantum circuit structure in addition to its gates’ features, which enable characterizing unpredicted quantum circuit errors. We use different metrics to measure the fidelity of the quantum circuit output. Our experimental results using different quantum algorithms executed on IBM Q Guadalupe quantum computer show the high prediction accuracy of our ML reliability models. Our results also show that our models can guide the single-qubit gate rescheduling to improve the output fidelity of the quantum circuit without the need for prior execution of dedicated calibration circuits.
Although the building of quantum computers has kept making rapid progress in recent years, noise is still the main challenge for any application to leverage the power of quantum computing. Existing works addressing noise in quantum devices proposed noise reduction when deploying a quantum algorithm to a specified quantum computer. The reproducibility issue of quantum algorithms has been raised since the noise levels vary on different quantum computers. Importantly, existing works largely ignore the fact that the noise of quantum devices varies as time goes by. Therefore, reproducing the results on the same hardware will even become a problem. We analyze the reproducibility of quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms based on daily model training and execution data collection. Our analysis shows a correlation between our QML models' test accuracy and quantum computer hardware's calibration features. We also demonstrate that noisy simulators for quantum computers are not a reliable tool for quantum machine learning applications.
Abstract Quantum computing has recently emerged as a novel paradigm for solving problems otherwise intractable on classical computers, yet the practical progress of quantum computers is severely impacted by noise, decoherence, and imperfect gate operations in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Specific to IBM Quantum hardware, imperfections due to readout error, gate errors, and device drift, which depends on time, resolves limits for the accuracy of outputs from our algorithms. The mitigation strategies currently used, for example, Measurement Error Mitigation (MEM), Zero Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), and Clifford Data Regression (CDR), offer improvement over raw, unmitigated outputs, but they are static and not dynamic; the reduction of noise in within an NISQ device is temporal and can vary in patterns that are non-zero. In addition to this, using the conventional methods provides inconsistent and suboptimal results.This study will provide enhanced reliability with respect to performing quantum computation on IBM Quantum hardware with a unique mitigation framework that is adaptive and computationally efficient for a high-fidelity output. The problem taken on here is the failure of existing error mitigation strategies to provide adaptive noise compensation, as they assume a statically-distributed error, despite the performance-related characteristics already being documented in regards to calibration drift and variation over time.To achieve this, we propose a Hybrid Adaptive Error Mitigation (HAEM) approach that includes baseline measurement error mitigation and an additional correction layer that utilizes realtime calibration information, along with lightweight machine learning models. The approach can be broken down into three steps: (i) perform standard measurement error mitigation to reduce classical readout noise, (ii) execute compact calibration circuits, such as Bell states, GHZ states and Clifford benchmarks to capture then current error profile of the device, and (iii) use a lightweight machine learning model (having been trained on historical and newest calibration data) to dynamically change the mitigation weights applied for the target quantum algorithm. All implementation is done using Qiskit Runtime to ensure low-latency execution, and we completed experiments on both Qiskit Aer noisy simulators and IBM Quantum devices.Initial results suggest HAEM improved the outputs of quantum algorithms' fidelity compared to the unmitigated runs and the baseline measurement error mitigation (MEM) runs. On the noisy simulators, HAEM increased fidelity from a raw performance of 0.65 to 0.87, nearly a 34% improvement. In fairer hardware-like scenarios, fidelity-on-average was persistently 12% better than MEM, with nearly equal time duration for the additional adaptive measurements. The adaptive aspect of HAEM consistently supported subsequent calibration cycles of the device and was effective to continue providing fidelity improvements despite the static mitigation performance degrading.To sum up, the proposed HAEM framework is a modern and viable alternative for error mitigation which brings together the benefits of baseline approaches with corrections that are driven by fixed-function error-corrective, adaptive learning. As both learning-based and standard baseline approaches can only achieve fixed levels of performance, HAEM, through its use of noise mitigation both at execution time and through correlating it with standard data, provides a route towards reliable quantum computations on current IBM hardware. HAEM also presents a contribution to the NISQ error-resilient landscape, and however it is intended that it will continue to improve future applications of hybrid workflows of quantum and classical computation where error mitigation and resilience is important.