Although the building of quantum computers has kept making rapid progress in recent years, noise is still the main challenge for any application to leverage the power of quantum computing. Existing works addressing noise in quantum devices proposed noise reduction when deploying a quantum algorithm to a specified quantum computer. The reproducibility issue of quantum algorithms has been raised since the noise levels vary on different quantum computers. Importantly, existing works largely ignore the fact that the noise of quantum devices varies as time goes by. Therefore, reproducing the results on the same hardware will even become a problem. We analyze the reproducibility of quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms based on daily model training and execution data collection. Our analysis shows a correlation between our QML models' test accuracy and quantum computer hardware's calibration features. We also demonstrate that noisy simulators for quantum computers are not a reliable tool for quantum machine learning applications.
Although the building of quantum computers has kept making rapid progress in recent years, noise is still the main challenge for any application to leverage the power of quantum computing. Existing works addressing noise in quantum devices proposed noise reduction when deploying a quantum algorithm to a specified quantum computer. The reproducibility issue of quantum algorithms has been raised since the noise levels vary on different quantum computers. Importantly, existing works largely ignore the fact that the noise of quantum devices varies as time goes by. Therefore, reproducing the results on the same hardware will even become a problem. We analyze the reproducibility of quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms based on daily model training and execution data collection. Our analysis shows a correlation between our QML models' test accuracy and quantum computer hardware's calibration features. We also demonstrate that noisy simulators for quantum computers are not a reliable tool for quantum machine learning applications.
Quantum computing represents a groundbreaking approach to high-performance computing. In recent years, quantum computers have progressed from single-qubit processors to systems boasting over 400 qubits. The presence of such a large number of qubits offers significant advantages, including enhanced computational speed—a capability beyond classical computing methods. However, the current stage of quantum computing is referred to as the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era. The existence of noise in this era presents challenges in testing quantum computing applications, leading to considerable variance in application results. Furthermore, the diverse noise characteristics observed across different machines exacerbate this issue, complicating the selection of the appropriate machine for application execution. In response to these challenges, we introduce our Predictive Quantum Machine Learning (PQML) tool. This tool is designed to predict outcomes when executing identical quantum machine learning applications—specifically, a critical suite of variational quantum algorithms—across various quantum computers during the NISQ era. This effort relies on data collected over a 12-month period. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to ensure reproducibility across quantum computers for complex circuits. Additionally, we have developed a model capable of forecasting the accuracy of quantum computers for variational quantum algorithms, with a particular emphasis on quantum machine learning as a case study.
The development of near-term quantum computers, referred to as Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers, has progressed rapidly in the past few years resulting in several quantum computers which vary in their underlying technology and physical constraints. The performance of these computers also varies from one quantum algorithm to another. To enable efficient selection of the quantum computer that provides the highest output fidelity for a given application, an accurate noise modeling of each quantum hardware is required. However, noise modeling for a given application is a complex problem because of the unknown interaction between the quantum circuit parameters and the noise parameters of NISQ devices. We propose the use of Machine Learning (ML) to model the performance of different quantum computers at the application level. The ML models predict the output fidelity of the quantum application executed on different quantum computers given their publicly available physical constraints. We use a diverse training dataset to cover the key features for application-level benchmarking of the quantum hardware. Our results obtained from different superconducting quantum devices show that our proposed ML models enable cost-effective quantum computer selection for different quantum applications with different fidelity metrics.
Quantum computing has emerged as a transformative paradigm capable of addressing computational challenges beyond the reach of classical systems.In the current era of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, practical quantum hardware is characterized by limited qubit counts, short coherence times, gate errors, and the absence of full error correction.Despite these constraints, significant progress has been made in developing quantum machine learning (QML) techniques tailored to operate on near-term quantum processors.This paper presents a comprehensive review of Quantum Machine Learning in the context of NISQ computing.We first outline the fundamental principles of quantum computing, including qubits, superposition, entanglement, and quantum parallelism, followed by a detailed discussion of the NISQ computing model and its hardware limitations.The review then examines hybrid quantum-classical learning frameworks, variational quantum algorithms, quantum data encoding strategies, and noise mitigation techniques that enable practical implementation on existing platforms.Emerging applications across healthcare, finance, cybersecurity, climate modeling, and materials science are also surveyed to highlight the real-world potential of QML.Furthermore, key challenges such as scalability, trainability issues, and algorithmic robustness are analyzed, along with current research efforts aimed at overcoming these barriers.The paper concludes by identifying promising future directions for advancing QML toward quantum advantage.This review aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a structured understanding of the capabilities, limitations, and opportunities of quantum machine learning in the NISQ era .
Quantum machine learning faces a big problem with noise in quantum computers. When quantum algorithms run on real devices or emulators with noise, accuracy becomes very bad compared to classical methods. This paper shows implementation of quantum classifiers that work better in noisy conditions using the Qiskit framework. The method combines three simple techniques. First technique compares different feature maps like ZZFeatureMap and PauliFeatureMap to find which one is more stable when noise exists. Second technique adds measurement error mitigation inside the training loop of the variational quantum classifier. Third technique uses a Qiskit transpiler for making circuits shorter which reduces noise effects. Testing happened on a Qiskit Aer simulator with a noise model taken from an IBM quantum computer. Three datasets used for testing-Iris data with 4 features, Wine data with 13 features, and a small part of breast cancer data. Results show that good feature map choice plus error mitigation give about 15% more accuracy than normal VQC in noisy environments. Circuit optimization makes the circuit 40% less deep than the original. The research demonstrates noise resilient quantum machine learning. Our Qiskit implementation achieves reproducible results while accurately modeling real quantum noise on classical simulators.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) is an accelerating field of study that leverages the principles of quantum mechanics to enhance and innovate within machine learning methodologies. However, Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers suffer from noise that corrupts the quantum states of the qubits and affects the training and inferencing accuracy. Furthermore, quantum computers have long access queues. A single execution with a pre-defined number of shots can take hours just to reach the top of the wait queue, which is especially disadvantageous to QML algorithms that are iterative in nature. Many vendors provide access to a suite of quantum hardware with varied qubit technologies, number of qubits, cou-pling architectures, and noise characteristics. However, present QML algorithms do not use them for the training procedure and often rely on local noiseless/noisy simulators due to cost and training timing overhead on real hardware. Taking these constraints into account, we perform a study to maximize the inferencing performance of QML workloads based on the choice of hardware selection. Specifically, we perform a detailed analysis of quantum classifiers (both training and inference through the lens of hardware queue wait times) on Iris and reduced Digits datasets under noise and varied conditions such as different hardware and coupling maps. We show that using multiple readily available hardware for training rather than relying on a single hardware, especially if it has a long queue depth of pending jobs, can lead to a performance impact of only 3–4 % while providing up to 45X reduction in training wait time.
At the intersection of two promising technologies, Machine Learning (ML) and Quantum Computing (QC), Quantum Machine Learning (QML) emerges. However, while QC is still in an early stage of development, QML is even more so. In this study, the Auto-MPG dataset was selected for its dimension, making it suitable for QML tasks within the current limitations of quantum hardware, especially regarding qubit requirements. Unlike classification problems that dominate the literature, regression problems have only been explored theoretically. This study aims to bridge that gap by applying QML techniques to a practical regression task. To this end, a preliminary analysis was conducted using a classical model as a reference point for subsequent evaluation. The quantum experimentation was performed in two phases: first, the model was trained in an ideal simulator to determine the model's best hyperparameters. Then, these best models were run in a noisy simulator using quantum error mitigation techniques. The results show how the Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQA) outperforms classical Extreme Gradient Boosting and the methods used to mitigate errors in quantum hardware are effective, as they achieve comparable results between the noisy simulator and the perfect simulator. This brings closer the possible applications in NISQ current devices.