Dirac’s theory is not the unique theory consistent with the physical principles specific of a free spin-one-half particle. In fact, we derive classes of theories of an elementary free particle from the principle of Poincaré’s invariance and from the principle of the covariance of the position. The theory of Dirac is just one of these theories, characterized by singular predictions, namely, the zitterbewegung. Yet, the class here derived contains families of consistent theories without singular predictions. For the time being, the experimental verifiability of these alternative theories is restricted to the predictions of free-particle theories for ideal experiments.
Dirac’s theory is not the unique theory consistent with the physical principles specific of a free spin-one-half particle. In fact, we derive classes of theories of an elementary free particle from the principle of Poincaré’s invariance and from the principle of the covariance of the position. The theory of Dirac is just one of these theories, characterized by singular predictions, namely, the zitterbewegung. Yet, the class here derived contains families of consistent theories without singular predictions. For the time being, the experimental verifiability of these alternative theories is restricted to the predictions of free-particle theories for ideal experiments.
The diffculties of relativistic particle theories formulated my means of canonical quantization, such as Klein-Gordon and Dirac theories, ultimately led theoretical physicists to turn on quantum field theory to model elementary particle physics. The aim of the present work is to pursue a method alternative to canonical quantization that avoids these dfficulties. In order to guarantee this result, the present approach is constrained to be developed deductively from physical principles. The physical principles assumed for a free particle consist of the symmetry properties of the particle with respect to the Poincaré group and of the transformation properties of the position observable, expressed by means of a suitably conceived notion of quantum transformation. In so doing, the effectiveness of group theoretical methods is exploited. Our work has pointed out the necessity of new classes of irreducible representations of the Poincaré group the theory can be based on. For spin 0 particle, four inequivalent theories are completely determined, that differ from Klein-Gordon theory for the physical interpretation but also for the mathematical structures. In particular, two of these theories requires irreducible representations in the new classes. The present lack of the explicit transformation properties of position with respect to boosts forbids the complete determination of non zero spin particle theories. A particular form of these transformation properties was in past adopted by Jordan and Mukunda. We check its consistency within the present approach; it is found that for spin 1/2 particles there is only one consistent theory; it is unitarily related to Dirac theory, but, once again, it requires the new classes of irreducible representations.
Dirac sought a relativistic quantum free-particle Hamiltonian that imposes space-time symmetry on the Schroedinger equation in configuration representation; he ignored the Lorentz covariance of energy-momentum. Dirac free-particle velocity therefore is momentum-independent, breaching relativity basics. Dirac also made solutions of his equation satisfy the Klein-Gordon equation via requirements imposed on its operators. Dirac particle speed is thereby fixed to the unphysical value of c times the square root of three, and anticommutation requirements prevent four observables, including the components of velocity, from commuting when Planck's constant vanishes, a correspondence-principle breach responsible for Dirac free-particle spontaneous acceleration (zitterbewegung) that diverges in the classical limit. Nonrelativistic Pauli theory contrariwise is physically sensible, and its particle rest-frame action can be extended to become Lorentz invariant. The consequent Lagrangian yields the corresponding closed-form relativistic Hamiltonian when magnetic field is absent, otherwise a successive-approximation regime applies.
The fact that the Dirac equation predicts Zitterbewegung (ZBW) for a free electron is well known from Schrodinger [E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 24, 418 (1930)] from the very early days of Dirac's relativistic quantum theory. Schrodingerdescribed ZBW qualitatively as a persistent interference between positive and negative energy states, and the objective of this and previous papers by this author [Phys. Essays 28, 1 (2015); Phys. Essays 29, 402 (2016)] is to describe ways to measure the presence or absence ofZBW for a free (or nearly free) electron. If ZBW measurements show that it is not present for a free electron, then the Dirac Equation and Schrodinger's analysis [E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 24, 418 (1930)] are inaccurate. If ZBW ispresent as Schrodinger's analysis [E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 24, 418 (1930)] of the Dirac Equation asserts, then a description of a free electron emerges that is significantly different than the present very small, static point electronwith “intrinsic” properties of spin and magnetic moment accepted by most physicists [Eides et al., Phys. Reports 342, 63 (2001).] today. This paper develops a quantitative theory of the free electron directly from the Dirac Equation and Schrodinger's analyses[E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 24, 418 (1930)] without any other assumptions. The fact that ZBW exists for the electron in the hydrogen atom is confirmed by the Darwin term [J. J. Sakurai, Advanced Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley,Reading, MA, 1967)]. It seems unnatural to the author that ZBW would vanish when the electron is removed from the hydrogen atom, and becomes free. The unanswered question is whether ZBW can be confirmed or refuted by measurement for a free electron, and possible ways to measure its presenceor absence are described in this paper. The remainder of the paper describes the free electron, assuming ZBW exists. The Dirac Equation [J. H. Wilson, Phys. Essays 28, 1 (2015); Phys. Essays 29, 402 (2016)] produces a physical description of a free electron's ZBW as rapidly oscillating,quantized Center of Charge (CoC) point rotating about a fictitious Center of Mass (CoM) at a radius of 3/ 2 times the electron's Compton wavelength. The results in the remainder of this paper, as well as Schrodinger's analyses [E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.)24, 418 (1930).], are only true if ZBW can be confirmed by measurement. In case measurements show no ZBW exists for a free electron, the Dirac Equation is not a correct description of a single free electron, and more serious problems arise. The static point like electron deduced fromscattering experiments [Eides et al., Phys. Rep. 342, 63 (2001)] that give estimates of the free electron's internal structure based on far field measurements can be misleading in estimating the free electron's internal structure. In Classical Electrodynamics, when one observesthe electric field from a point electron and from a sphere with the same charge spread uniformly over its surface from the far field, Gauss' Law shows that the electric fields are identical. When one tries to “observe” or “measure” the free electron's internal structurewith the high-energy photons required, the single particle free electron is completely destroyed by the measurement process. In fact, any attempt to observe or measure a free electron's structure ensures that the electron is no longer a totally free single particle, and one must be carefulto use only elastic observation methods [J. H. Wilson, Phys. Essays 28, 1 (2015); Phys. Essays 29, 402 (2016)] for this very difficult measurement. Observing a free Quark, much less its internal structure, has proven very difficult, if not impossible.
This paper presents a relativistic symmetrical interpretation of the Dirac equation in 1+1 dimensions which predicts no zitterbewegung for a free spin-1/2 particle. This could resolve the longstanding puzzle of zitterbewegung in relativistic quantum mechanics, and help clarify the physical meaning of the zitterbewegung currently under investigation in many-particle systems. Together with an earlier paper describing a relativistic symmetrical interpretation of the Klein-Gordon equation \cite{Heaney1}, this new interpretation resolves some inconsistencies in the conventional interpretations of both equations. This new interpretation also makes several experimental predictions that differ from the conventional interpretation of the Dirac equation.
Abstract The Pryce (e) spin and position operators of the quantum theory of Dirac's free field were re-defined and studied recently with the help of a new spin symmetry and suitable spectral representations [Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1073 (2022)]. This approach is generalized here, associating a pair of integral operators acting directly on particle and antiparticle wave spinors in momentum representation to any integral operator in configuration representation, acting on mode spinors. This framework allows an effective quantization procedure, giving a large set of one-particle operators with physical meaning as the spin and orbital parts of the isometry generators, the Pauli-Lubanski and position operators, or other spin-type operators proposed to date. Special attention is paid to the operators that mix the particle and antiparticle sectors whose off-diagonal associated operators have oscillating terms producing Zitterbevegung. The principal operators of this type, including the usual coordinate operator, are derived here for the first time. As an application, it is shown that an apparatus measuring these new observables may prepare and detect one-particle wave packets moving uniformly without Zitterbewegung or spin dynamics, spreading in time normally as any other relativistic or even non-relativistic wave packet.
“Despite almost a century’s worth of study, it is still unclear how general relativity (GR) and quantum theory (QT) should be unified into a consistent theory. The conventional approach is to retain the foundational principles of QT, such as the superposition principle, and modify GR. This is referred to as ‘quantizing gravity’, resulting in a theory of ‘quantum gravity’. The opposite approach is ‘gravitizing QT’ where we attempt to keep the principles of GR, such as the equivalence principle, and consider how this leads to modifications of QT. What we are most lacking in understanding which route to take, if either, is experimental guidance. Here we consider using the Dirac–Pauli representation of free Dirac equation to search for the clues. In particular, we study how the double-slit diffraction experiment, when only one Dirac particle (‘say’ electron) at a time is in the apparatus, could test a gravitizing QT proposal in which the wavefunction collapse emerges on the detector screen from the Dirac–Pauli representation, as an objective process, resolving the measurement problem of QT.” [1] We found that the Dirac–Pauli representation is inherently a unified theory embodying a gravitizing QT proposal that Dirac–Pauli representation as wave nature is manifestation of inertial mass and the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation as particle nature is manifestation of gravitational mass such that the fact, that same physics is involved in these two representations, is simply the validity and exhibition of the principle of equivalence, of GR, in QT. [1] Richard Howl et al 2019 New J. Phys. 21 043047 DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/ab104a