Digital Communications and Networks

Doped low-density parity-check codes

Yong Li, Rui Liu, Xianlong Jiao, Youqiang Hu, Zhen Luo, Francis C. M. Lau

Published Dec 2, 2022• 1 citation

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a doping approach to lower the error floor of Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) codes. The doping component is a short block code in which the information bits are selected from the coded bits of the dominant trapping sets of the LDPC code. Accordingly, an algorithm for selecting the information bits of the short code is proposed, and a specific two-stage decoding algorithm is presented. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed doped LDPC code achieves up to 2.0 dB gain compared with the original LDPC code at a frame error rate of 10−6. Furthermore, the proposed design can lower the error floor of original LDPC codes.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dcan.2022.11.013

Related papers

A Construction Method of Doped Low-Density Parity-Check Codes Based on Quadratic Residue Codes

Yong Li, Xiang Huang, Chuan Zhou +2 more

In this paper, we propose an approach to constructing a class of doped low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, by utilizing some coded bits of an LDPC code as the information bits of a quadratic residues (QR) code and then integrating the corresponding two Tanner graphs as a whole. Herein, the trapping set information of the LDPC code is used for selecting the information bits of the QR code. Simulation results show that the proposed doped LDPC codes achieve more than 1.4 dB and 1.0 dB gains with slight rate losses, respectively, at a frame error rate of 10-5, when compared to two regular LDPC codes.

International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication TechnologyApr 14, 20212 citations

A Two-Stage Decoding Algorithm to Lower the Error-Floors for LDPC Codes

Xueting Zhang, Shaoping Chen

A two-stage decoding algorithm to lower the error-floor for low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes is presented. An efficient stopping criterion is proposed to avoid unnecessary iterations in the first stage. If the stopping criterion is reached, the first stage decoding will be terminated and the second stage decoding will be started, where the unsuccessfully decoded words are re-decoded by manipulating the log-likelihood ratio (LLR) of two types of specifically selected variable nodes. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can effectively lower the error floor of LDPC codes while maintaining a low decoding complexity.

IEEE Communications LettersFeb 9, 201512 citations

A Modified Sum-Product Algorithm for Error Floor Reduction in LDPC Codes

Un-Hee Park, Dae-Sub Oh, Youngmin Kim +1 more

In this paper, a modified sum-product algorithm to correct bit errors captured within the trapping sets, which are produced in decoding of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, is proposed. Unlike the original sum-product algorithm, the proposed decoding method consists of two stages. Whether the main cause of decoding failure is the trapping sets or not is determined at the first stage. And the bit errors within the trapping sets are corrected at the second stage. In the modified algorithm, the set of failed check nodes and the transition patterns of hard-decision bits are exploited to search variable nodes in the trapping sets. After inverting information of the variable nodes, the sum-product algorithm is carried out to correct the bit errors. As a result of simulation, the proposed algorithm shows continuously improved error performance with increase in the signal-to-noise ratio. It is, therefore, considered that the modified sum-product algorithm significantly reduces or possibly eliminates the error floor in LDPC codes.

한국통신학회논문지Jan 1, 20104 citations

Additional check node to improve the performance of LDPC codes in the error floor region

Kuntal Deka, A. Rajesh, Prabin Kumar Bora

This paper presents a new scheme to reduce the detrimental effect of the trapping sets in the regular and irregular low density parity check (LDPC) codes. By adding only one new check node and properly selecting its edges, the performance in the error floor region can be improved. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme decreases the bit error rate (BER) and frame error rate (FER) significantly in the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) region at the expense of negligible rate loss.

National Conference on CommunicationsFeb 1, 20120 citations

An efficient algorithm for finding dominant trapping sets of LDPC codes

Mehdi Karimi Dehkordi, Amir H. Banihashemi

This paper presents an efficient algorithm for finding the dominant trapping sets of a low-density parity-check (LDPC) code. This algorithm can be used to estimate the error floor of LDPC codes or to be part of the apparatus to design LDPC codes with low error floors. The algorithm is initiated with a set of short cycles as the input. The cycles are then expanded recursively to dominant trapping sets of increasing size. At the core of the algorithm lies the analysis of the graphical structure of dominant trapping sets and the relationship of such structures to short cycles. The algorithm is universal in the sense that it can be used for an arbitrary graph and that it can be tailored to find other graphical objects, such as absorbing sets and Zyablov-Pinsker (ZP) trapping sets, known to dominate the performance of LDPC codes in the error floor region over different channels and for different iterative decoding algorithms. Simulation results on several LDPC codes demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed algorithm. In particular, the algorithm is significantly faster than the existing search algorithms for dominant trapping sets.

International Symposium on Turbo Codes and Iterative Information ProcessingSep 1, 201029 citations

Controlling the Error Floors of the Low-Density Parity-Check Codes

Shuai Zhang

The goal of error control coding is to encode information in such a way, that in the event that errors occur during transmission over a noisy communication channel or during storage in an unreliable memory, the receiver can correct the errors and recover the original transmitted information. Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a kind of high performance linear block code, which are already used in many recent communication systems. Information rates guaranteed by these codes approach the theoretical Shannon capacity limit. In addition, LDPC codes are now widely used in practice and included in many communication standards. Therefore study of these codes is very important and practical approaches to their design and decoding techniques are of great interest. There exist very good decoding algorithms for LDPC codes with respect to different channel models. However, LDPC codes suffer from the infamous error floor problem at high signal-to-noise ratios. This problem is attributed to the trapping sets by Richardson. It is shown that the dominant trapping sets of regular LDPC codes, so called absorption sets, undergo a two-phase dynamic behavior in the iterative message-passing decoding algorithm. We present a linear dynamic model for the iteration behavior of these sets. It can be seen that they undergo an initial geometric growth phase which stabilizes in a final bit-flipping behavior where the algorithm reaches a fixed point. Our analysis is shown to lead to very accurate numerical calculations of the error floor bit error rates down to error rates that are inaccessible by simulation. The topologies of the dominant absorption sets of two example codes, the IEEE 802.3an [2048,1723] regular (6,32) LDPC code and the Tanner [155,64,20] regular (3,5) LDPC code, are identified and tabulated by using topological features in combination with search algorithms, respectively. To make our analysis more complete, we provide more solid evidence showing that trapping sets are equivalent to absorption sets. In other words, we argue that absorption sets characterize all failure mechanisms. Some insights from our linear analysis can be borrowed to approach this problem. Another insight that this formula provides to us is the means to reduce the error floor, which is another important part of what we hoped to achieve by developing the formula in the first place. By allowing the log-likelihood ratios (LLRs) utilized by the message-passing decoding to grow bigger in precision length, the absorption sets as a trouble-causing structure will be successfully corrected. Therefore, the absorption sets, generically born with the code design, will no longer threaten the error correcting performance as long as the messages have enough room and time to grow. This translates to greater LLR clipping thresholds and more iterations, both of which are preset at the decoder. However, the actual settings are dependent on how much the subgraph of the dominant absorption set resembles that of a non-zero minimum-weight codeword, therefore the settings are empirical. In general more likeness in their topologies, the more effort it costs to correct the absorption set.

Jan 1, 20130 citations