Different kinds of quantum computing prototypes and simulators have been developed rapidly, and entry-level cloud-based quantum computing services begun to emerge. Various noise in quantum computer had significant impact on its execution results, which were also focus of benchmark and performance evaluation. Based on IBM Quantum Lab platform, several application algorithms have been executed in both quantum backend and simulator to verify the impact of circuit depth, different quantum noise model and parameters on the fidelity of quantum computing results. The prospect of quantum computing benchmark evaluation was also discussed.
Different kinds of quantum computing prototypes and simulators have been developed rapidly, and entry-level cloud-based quantum computing services begun to emerge. Various noise in quantum computer had significant impact on its execution results, which were also focus of benchmark and performance evaluation. Based on IBM Quantum Lab platform, several application algorithms have been executed in both quantum backend and simulator to verify the impact of circuit depth, different quantum noise model and parameters on the fidelity of quantum computing results. The prospect of quantum computing benchmark evaluation was also discussed.
Context: The main obstacle of quantum computing on its way to scalability is the noisy nature of current hardware. Various types of errors lead to incorrect computational results,and measures such as quantum error mitigation are needed to counteract these errors. Many error mitigation techniques require a thorough understanding of the noise and its impact on computations. Therefore, accurate noise models are indispensable to facilitate meaningful quantum computing in the near future. They also enable realistic simulations of quantum devices. Since these devices are currently limited and quantum computing is expensive, researchers typically rely on simulations for testing their algorithms.Objective: In this thesis, we aim to construct a realistic noise model for quantum computing and optimise its model parameters. The model construction should build on the underlying physical processes, and the number of parameters should scale well with the system size. We also address the evaluation and comparison of different noise models by benchmarks using quantum circuits specific to real-world applications. Finally, we aim to develop useful graphical representations of noise models based on the existing quantum circuit model.Method: We present a benchmarking framework for quantum computing noise models and evaluate it based on benchmarking quality attributes from the literature. Moreover, we construct a quantum computing noise model and develop a training procedure for its parameters. We analyse the parameters of the trained noise model and the impact ofdifferent types of errors on computations. We benchmark the noise model with the above approach and compare it to a noise model provided by IBM’s software development kit Qiskit. Finally, we develop an extension of the quantum circuit model to represent noise channels.Result: The benchmarks performed in this thesis show that our noise model predicts noisy hardware behaviour of IBM’s ibmq_manila quantum device equally well as the Qiskit model, if not better, based on quantum circuits commonly used for variational quantum algorithms. Within the trained noise model, readout error has the most detrimental impact on computations. Our benchmarking approach satisfies relevant quality criteria by choosing suitable quantum circuits and objective functions to compare model predictionsto hardware data. Moreover, the quantum circuit model can be extended meaningfully by noise channels.Conclusion: Our benchmarking approach is suitable for evaluating and comparing quantum computing noise models. In future work, volumetric benchmarks should be performed for various noise models and application contexts. The parameter optimisation based on learning with training circuits yields accurate noise models and shows the importance of mitigating measurement error. Different optimisation algorithms and quantum circuits should be explored, and more types of noise should be incorporated into the noise model.
Cloud-accessible quantum processors enable direct execution of quantum algorithms on heterogeneous hardware platforms. Unlike classical systems, however, identical quantum circuits may exhibit substantially different behavior across devices due to architectural variations in qubit connectivity, gate fidelity, and coherence times.
In this work, we systematically benchmark five representative quantum algorithms - Bell state preparation, GHZ state generation, Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT), Grover's Search, and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) - across trapped-ion, superconducting, and simulator backends using Amazon Braket. Performance metrics including fidelity, CHSH violation, success probability, circuit depth, and gate counts are evaluated.
Our results demonstrate a strong dependence of algorithmic performance on hardware topology and noise characteristics. For example, 10-qubit GHZ states achieved fidelities above 0.8 on trapped-ion hardware, while superconducting platforms dropped below 0.15 due to routing overhead and accumulated two-qubit gate errors. These findings highlight the importance of hardware-aware algorithm selection and provide practical guidance for benchmarking in the NISQ era.
Abstract This practical guide explores the use of IBM Quantum cloud simulators for modeling and analyzing quantum circuits under realistic conditions. Using the IBM Q platform and Qiskit Runtime, the work demonstrates how to configure the ibmq_qasm_simulator and map a basic noise model derived from a physical IBM Quantum™ device. The guide focuses on: Setting up the ibmq_qasm_simulator in Qiskit. Extracting and applying a hardware-based noise model from a real IBM Quantum backend. Performing noisy simulations of QuantumCircuits. Using Sampler and Estimator primitives in Qiskit Runtime to analyze circuit outputs. Studying the impact of realistic quantum errors such as decoherence, gate infidelity, and readout noise. By incorporating noise models into simulations, researchers and developers can better understand how quantum circuits behave on real hardware, optimize algorithms before deployment, and design more robust quantum programs. This approach bridges the gap between idealized simulations and physical quantum devices, making it a critical step toward practical quantum application development.
Quantum AI is a new way to think about the future of Artificial Intelligence through the merging of two technologies: quantum computing and advanced machine learning. Quantum AI has the potential to provide solutions to computationally difficult problems that traditional systems cannot solve. Quantum AI's continued success will rely on advancements in hybrid quantum-classical solutions, as well as the expansion of quantum hardware; hence, research remains necessary to conduct systematic benchmarks as well as performance analysis in order to determine both how well quantum AI algorithms perform practically, and where their limitations lie. In this chapter, detailed examinations of benchmarks that have been developed specifically for quantum AI are presented alongside evaluative metrics across various key areas of performance including algorithmic efficiency, scalability, noise immunity, and resource use for various types of quantum architectures. The chapter integrates dialogue between theory and practice to demonstrate ways in which performance metrics (i.e., quantum circuit depth, fidelity, convergence behaviour and computational complexity) can effectively compare Quantum AI algorithms to classical algorithms. Particular attention is given to hybrid variational algorithms, quantum-enhanced optimization algorithms, and quantum machine learning. Using benchmark datasets, simulation frameworks and new evaluation methods, there are several challenges in terms of reproducibility, hardware variability and algorithm/hardware co-design that emerge through analysis of the above metrics as well. Aside from focusing on a more broad view of how Performance Evaluation relates to developing more effective Quantum AI Solutions. In addition to viewing Benchmarking as a technical exercise solely, this chapter provides a more holistic view in relation to a human perspective of the situation. This paper outlines how performance evaluation practices can be used as a considerable and well-designed means of bridging the gap between the promise of Quantum Technology at an abstract level, and the ability of Quantum Technology to produce tangible outcomes in the real world by adopting a more comprehensive Governance-oriented approach to Benchmarking Quantum AI Systems. The purpose of this chapter is to assist the growing community of researchers, practitioners, and Strategic Technology Professionals by providing them with a clear and structured framework for Evaluation of Quantum AI Algorithms. There is a significant focus of the chapter on establishing important reference points that organizations can use to determine when an intelligent system has successfully achieved a true and validated quantum advantage. The ultimate goal is to assist in guiding the responsible development and implementation of Quantum AI to enable the Potential Benefits of Quantum AI to be realized, in ways that are meaningful and impactful.
A cloud quantum computer is a quantum computer that can be accessed in a cloud environment through a network. Today, there are numbers of cloud quantum computing services that can be accessed by users. They are used to solve complex problems that require powerful computing. Different cloud quantum computing services deliver different architecture and performances. In our study, we conducted a research on some services to test and evaluate the performances of different cloud quantum computing services and make a comparison out of it. The test will be conducted using two different methods such as visual programming and qiskit. From the result, we can see that the amount of qubit per backend and shots per run pretty much affect the execution time of a cloud quantum computing. This test will give the users some insight and enables them to decide which cloud quantum computing services deliver better performance or faster execution time based on the specification each cloud quantum computer offers.
Quantum computing has emerged as a transformative paradigm capable of solving complex computational problems that are intractable for classical computers. Central to the advancement of this technology is the development of efficient quantum algorithms and high fidelity simulations that enable the design, testing, and optimization of quantum solutions before deployment on physical hardware. This study focuses on the design and implementation of quantum algorithms tailored for solving a variety of quantum problems, including quantum chemistry, optimization, and cryptography. Using state of the art simulation platforms such as Qiskit, Cirq, and Pennylane, algorithm performance was evaluated in terms of accuracy, execution time, scalability, and resilience to noise. Benchmarks demonstrate that algorithms such as the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) achieve significant speedups in problem specific domains, while hybrid quantum–classical methods provide robust pathways for near term quantum advantage. Simulation results reveal that algorithmic efficiency can be significantly improved through optimized circuit depth, qubit connectivity mapping, and advanced error mitigation techniques. The findings highlight the potential of simulation driven quantum algorithm development in accelerating the practical realization of quantum computing applications across disciplines such as materials discovery, molecular modeling, secure communications, and complex optimization tasks.