Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optics Communications

Implementation of the quantum three box paradox through atomic internal states

Aqsa Gul, Muhammad Imran, Muhammad Haroon Saeed, Rameez‐ul‐Islam, Manzoor Ikram

Published Jun 9, 2022• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.optcom.2022.128587

Related papers

Quantum three-box paradox: a proposal for atom optics implementation

Muhammad Imran, Rameez‐ul Islam, Muhammad Haroon Saeed +1 more

Quantum Information Processing•Apr 1, 2021•5 citations

The three-box paradox revisited using the Majorana representation of the quantum states

Mirko Cormann, Mathilde Remy, Yves Caudano

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 8, 2018•0 citations

Measurements, disturbances and the quantum three box paradox

O. J. E. Maroney

arXiv:1207.3114•Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Feb 16, 2017•15 citations

Three-box paradox and ‘Cheshire cat grin’: the case of spin-1 atoms

A. Matzkin, A K Pan

We propose in this work a definite theoretical implementation of the three-box paradox - a scheme in which a single quantum particle appears to be present with certainty in two separate boxes - with spin-1 atoms. We further show how our setup can give rise to a "Cheshire cat grin" type of situation, in which an atom can apparently be found with certainty in one of the boxes while one of its properties (the angular momentum projection along a specifically chosen axis) appears to be in a different box. The significance of our findings are discussed relative to the status of the properties of a system obtained from weak measurements.

arXiv:1305.2519•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jul 19, 2013•27 citations

Experimental realization of the quantum box problem

Kevin J. Resch, Jeff S. Lundeen, Aephraim M. Steinberg

arXiv:quant-ph/0310091•Physics Letters A•Feb 27, 2004•213 citations

The Three-Box Paradox Revisited

Ravon, T, Vaidman, L

The classical three-box paradox of Kirkpatrick [J. Phys. A 36 4891 (2003)] is compared to the original quantum Three-Box paradox of Aharonov and Vaidman [J. Phys. A 24 2315 (1991)]. It is argued that the quantum Three-Box experiment is a "quantum paradox" in the sense that it is an example of a classical task which cannot be accomplished using classical means, but can be accomplished using quantum devices. It is shown that Kirkpatrick's card game is analogous to a different game with a particle in three boxes which does not contain paradoxical features.

•Jun 8, 2006•30 citations
We propose in this work a definite theoretical implementation of the three-box paradox - a scheme in which a single quantum particle appears to be present with certainty in two separate boxes - with spin-1 atoms. We further show how our setup can give rise to a "Cheshire cat grin" type of situation, in which an atom can apparently be found with certainty in one of the boxes while one of its properties (the angular momentum projection along a specifically chosen axis) appears to be in a different box. The significance of our findings are discussed relative to the status of the properties of a system obtained from weak measurements.
The classical three-box paradox of Kirkpatrick [J. Phys. A 36 4891 (2003)] is compared to the original quantum Three-Box paradox of Aharonov and Vaidman [J. Phys. A 24 2315 (1991)]. It is argued that the quantum Three-Box experiment is a "quantum paradox" in the sense that it is an example of a classical task which cannot be accomplished using classical means, but can be accomplished using quantum devices. It is shown that Kirkpatrick's card game is analogous to a different game with a particle in three boxes which does not contain paradoxical features.