Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

日本物理学会講演概要集. 年会

28a-PS-6 Accurate estimates of 3D Ising critical exponents using the CAM

Miroslav Kolesik, Masuo Suzuki

Published Mar 16, 1995• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Accurate estimates of 3D Ising critical exponents using the coherent-anomaly method

Miroslav Kolesik, Masuo Suzuki

arXiv:cond-mat/9411109•Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Apr 1, 1995•23 citations

CAM estimates of critical exponents of spin glasses and percolation

Masuo Suzuki

Physics Letters A•Mar 1, 1988•25 citations

28a-WA-5 Estimation of critical exponents at the θ point in two dimensions

Takao Ishinabe

日本物理学会講演概要集•Mar 16, 1994•0 citations

Surface Critical Exponents of the 3D Clean Ising Model and 3D Random Field Ising Model

Forrest Simmons, E. W. Carlson, Karin A. Dahmen

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 16, 2021•0 citations

Accurate estimates of 3D Ising critical exponents using the Coherent-Anomaly Method

Miroslav Kolesik, Masuo Suzuki

An analysis of the critical behavior of the three-dimensional Ising model using the coherent-anomaly method (CAM) is presented. Various sources of errors in CAM estimates of critical exponents are discussed, and an improved scheme for the CAM data analysis is tested. Using a set of mean-field type approximations based on the variational series expansion approach, accuracy comparable to the most precise conventional methods has been achieved. Our results for the critical exponents are given by α = 0.108(5), β = 0.327(4), γ = 1.237(4) and δ = 4.77(5).

•Jan 1, 2008•12 citations

Accurate Monte Carlo critical exponents for Ising lattices

Jorge Garcı́a, Julio A. Gonzalo

arXiv:cond-mat/0304056•Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Jun 3, 2003•17 citations
An analysis of the critical behavior of the three-dimensional Ising model using the coherent-anomaly method (CAM) is presented. Various sources of errors in CAM estimates of critical exponents are discussed, and an improved scheme for the CAM data analysis is tested. Using a set of mean-field type approximations based on the variational series expansion approach, accuracy comparable to the most precise conventional methods has been achieved. Our results for the critical exponents are given by α = 0.108(5), β = 0.327(4), γ = 1.237(4) and δ = 4.77(5).