Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Princeton University Press eBooks

B. Quantum Tunneling Energies

C. C. Chancey, M. C.M. O’Brien

Published Dec 31, 1998• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1515/9780691225340-011

Related papers

Quantum Tunneling Energies

Princeton University Press eBooks•Feb 9, 2021•0 citations

Energy, Quantization and Quantum Tunneling

Jean-Louis Basdevant

Graduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Energy loss in quantum tunnelling

U. Weiss, Peter S. Riseborough, Peter Hänggi A +1 more

Physics Letters A•Aug 1, 1984•36 citations

Quantum tunneling as a classical anomaly

Carl M. Bender, Daniel W. Hook

Classical mechanics is a singular theory in that real-energy classical particles can never enter classically forbidden regions. However, if one regulates classical mechanics by allowing the energy E of a particle to be complex, the particle exhibits quantum-like behavior: complex-energy classical particles can travel between classically allowed regions separated by potential barriers. When Im E → 0, the classical tunneling probabilities persist. Hence, one can interpret quantum tunneling as an anomaly. A numerical comparison of complex classical tunneling probabilities with quantum tunneling probabilities leads to the conjecture that as Re E increases, complex classical tunneling probabilities approach the corresponding quantum probabilities. Thus, this work attempts to generalize the Bohr correspondence principle from classically allowed to classically forbidden regions.

arXiv:1011.0121•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Aug 23, 2011•26 citations

Quantum Mechanical Tunneling

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Sep 1, 2012•0 citations

Coherent Quantum Tunneling of Bose-Einstein Condensates in Optical Lattices

Zaira Nazario, David Santiago

We study inter-well coherent quantum tunneling of Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC's) in optical lattices. Irrespective of whether the BEC is a superfluid in the whole lattice, it may or may not be a superfluid within each well of the lattice depending on whether the ratio of the well kinetic energy to the interaction energy is small or large. When the bosons in each well are superfluid, we have Josephson tunneling among the wells driven by the phase difference between the superfluids in the different wells. For typical lattice parameters the Josephson tunneling rate will be somewhat enhanced from the naive estimate of (tunneling energy scale)$/\hbar$. Whether it is enhanced or not will depend on lattice parameters, but it can never be zero. When the bosons in each well are not superfluid, there is coherent quantum tunneling of essentially free bosons between the wells. This tunneling is proportional to the boson number difference between the wells.

arXiv:cond-mat/0312417•Dec 17, 2003•0 citations
Classical mechanics is a singular theory in that real-energy classical particles can never enter classically forbidden regions. However, if one regulates classical mechanics by allowing the energy E of a particle to be complex, the particle exhibits quantum-like behavior: complex-energy classical particles can travel between classically allowed regions separated by potential barriers. When Im E → 0, the classical tunneling probabilities persist. Hence, one can interpret quantum tunneling as an anomaly. A numerical comparison of complex classical tunneling probabilities with quantum tunneling probabilities leads to the conjecture that as Re E increases, complex classical tunneling probabilities approach the corresponding quantum probabilities. Thus, this work attempts to generalize the Bohr correspondence principle from classically allowed to classically forbidden regions.
We study inter-well coherent quantum tunneling of Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC's) in optical lattices. Irrespective of whether the BEC is a superfluid in the whole lattice, it may or may not be a superfluid within each well of the lattice depending on whether the ratio of the well kinetic energy to the interaction energy is small or large. When the bosons in each well are superfluid, we have Josephson tunneling among the wells driven by the phase difference between the superfluids in the different wells. For typical lattice parameters the Josephson tunneling rate will be somewhat enhanced from the naive estimate of (tunneling energy scale)/ℏ/\hbar/ℏ. Whether it is enhanced or not will depend on lattice parameters, but it can never be zero. When the bosons in each well are not superfluid, there is coherent quantum tunneling of essentially free bosons between the wells. This tunneling is proportional to the boson number difference between the wells.