Newton thought that light was made up of particles, but then it was discovered that it behaves like a wave. Later, however it was found that light did indeed sometimes behave like a particle. Historically, the electron, for example, was thought to behave like a particle, and then it was found that in many respects it behaved like a wave. At our current levels of experimental sensitivity, there is no evidence for any constituent objects within electrons, hence they are regarded as fundamental particles. They have an electrical charge which is negative and a very tiny mass. While thinking about experiments involving beams of atoms and magnetic fields, Otto Stern realized that passing a beam of specially selected atoms through a nonuniform external magnetic field would apply a force to the atomic magnets.
Newton thought that light was made up of particles, but then it was discovered that it behaves like a wave. Later, however it was found that light did indeed sometimes behave like a particle. Historically, the electron, for example, was thought to behave like a particle, and then it was found that in many respects it behaved like a wave. At our current levels of experimental sensitivity, there is no evidence for any constituent objects within electrons, hence they are regarded as fundamental particles. They have an electrical charge which is negative and a very tiny mass. While thinking about experiments involving beams of atoms and magnetic fields, Otto Stern realized that passing a beam of specially selected atoms through a nonuniform external magnetic field would apply a force to the atomic magnets.
Newton thought that light was made up of particles, but then it was discovered, as we have seen here, that it behaves like a wave. Later, however (in the beginning of the twentieth century) it was found that light did indeed sometimes behave like a particle. Historically, the electron, for example, was thought to behave like a particle, and then it was found that in many respects it behaved like a wave. So it really behaves like neither. Now we have given up. We say: “it is like neither.” ere is one lucky break, however-electrons behave like light. e quantum behaviour of atomic objects (electrons, protons, neutron, photons, and so on) is the same for all, they are all ‘particle waves’ or whatever you want to call them.
Introduction It is believed that the basic physical building blocks forming the world we live in may be categorized into particles of matter and carriers of force between matter. All known elementary constituents of matter and transmitters of force are quantized. For example, energy, momentum, and angular momentum take on discrete quantized values. The electron is an example of an elementary particle of matter, and the photon is an example of a transmitter of force. Neutrons, protons, and atoms are composite particles made up of elementary particles of matter and transmitters of force. These composite particles are also quantized. Because classical mechanics is unable to explain quantization, we must learn quantum mechanics in order to understand the microscopic properties of atoms – which, for example, make up solids such as crystalline semiconductors. Historically, the laws of quantum mechanics have been established by experiment. The most important early experiments involved light. Long before it was realized that light waves are quantized into particles called photons, key experiments on the wave properties of light were performed. For example, it was established that the color of visible light is associated with different wavelengths of light. Table 2.1 shows the range of wavelengths corresponding to different colors. The connection between optical and electrical phenomena was established by Maxwell in 1864. This extended the concept of light to include the complete electromagnetic spectrum. A great deal of effort was, and continues to be, spent gathering information on the behavior of light.
The years of the third decade of the present century were heady times. Old social orders were being swept away, monarchies becoming republics and the United States of America was emerging as a world power. In physics too, revolutions were taking place, none more potent than that which resulted in the emergence of quantum mechanics as a model for the behaviour of sub-atomic particles. It was Newton who first suggested that light was particulate but during the nineteenth century this view had fallen into neglect. Indeed a number of experiments, for example the classic Young's slits experiment, demonstrated quite conclusively that light was a wave motion. How else could interference fringes occur? However, the experiments on the photoelectric effect demonstrated just as conclusively that light energy was carried in packets, or quanta, and that a continuous wave description was not applicable. This ‘wave or particle’ dilemma was not unique to the behaviour of light. J. J. Thompson showed that cathode rays were charged, had a well defined mass and had all the properties expected of a beam of particles. Nevertheless, Davisson and Germer showed that diffraction of electrons could take place, an effect made visually much more dramatic by G. P. Thompson's transmission electron diffraction patterns. Nowadays, electron diffraction is used as a routine analytical tool in all advanced metallurgical and materials science laboratories (Fig. 2.1). Clearly new axioms were required.
Einstein’s 1905 paper on the photoelectric effect, in which he considered Planck’s idea of quanta of energy to be a universal characteristic of light, marks the beginning of quantum theory. Electrons and other quantum particles behave like particles and like waves, depending on the particular observation. An electron occupies a position in space only when an observation is made. Heisenberg decided that the problem of the actual orbits of the electrons inside the atom should be ignored; they have no meaning. Schrodinger reasoned that if an electron has a wave-like behavior, then it should be possible to describe this behavior in space and time by a wave equation. Soon after it was discovered that high-speed electrons had wavelengths that were much shorter than the wavelengths of light, physicists showed that magnetic fields could act as lenses by causing electron waves to converge to a focus.
Einstein assumed duality between radiation and particles. Experiments involving electrons and diffraction effects are described to illustrate such behaviors. Classical physics and Einstein’s findings unmistakably demonstrated that light possessed both wave and particle properties. The responses of electrons in electric and magnetic fields are evidence for their existence as charged particles. The relationship between particle- and wave-like behavior was given by de Broglie in 1924. The dual nature of electrons was demonstrated experimentally by Davisson and Germer, when studying the diffraction of a stream of electrons. The reflection or diffraction of a beam of electromagnetic radiation can be expected to change its intensity, but changes in its wavelength would not ordinarily be anticipated. Photons and electrons may be described in terms of waves, but this approach has inherent limitations. The greater the attempt that is made to study the nature or behavior of a photon or a particle, the greater will be the uncertainty or error of the measurements.
Those defile the purity of mathematical and philosophical truthy who confound real quantities with their relations and sensible measures. —ISAAC NEWTON, Principia Before we say anything about quantum mechanics, let us take a quick look at the Newtonian (or ‘classical’) view of the physical universe. According to that view, nature consists of an enormous number of particles. When Newtonian physics is combined with the theory of the electromagnetic field, it becomes convenient to think of these particles as dimensionless (even if there is a kind of conceptual strain involved in trying to think of something as having a mass but not any size ), and as possessing electrical properties – negative charge, or positive charge, or neutrality. This leads to the well-known ‘solar system’ view of the atom – with the electrons whirling around the nucleons (neutrons and protons) just as the planets whirl around the sun. Out of atoms are built molecules; out of molecules, macroscopic objects, scaling from dust motes to whole planets and stars. These latter also fall into larger groupings – solar systems and galaxies – but these larger structures differ from the ones previously mentioned in being held together exclusively by gravitational forces. At every level, however, one has trajectories (ultimately that means the possibility of continuously tracing the movements of the elementary particles) and one has causality (ultimately that means the possibility of extrapolating from the history of the universe up to a given time to its whole sequence of future states).