We provide a reasonable explanation for measurement where no wave function in the sense of quantum mechanics is collapsed. The wave functions of the particles in the measuring device should be considered together with the measured particle as one system. The measurement is actually a physical process which makes the wave functions of different paths orthogonal. The collapsed wave function is just an equivalent one to explain certain physical phenomena. Our understanding of measurement also provides reasonable explanations for both EPR paradox and the experiments of delayed quantum eraser.
The basic idea of quantum mechanics is that the property of any system can be in a state of superposition of various possibilities (or eigen states).This state of superposition is also known as wave function and it evolves linearly with time in a deterministic way in accordance with the Schrodinger equation.However, when a measurement is carried out on the system to determine the value of that property (say position), the system instantaneously transforms to one of the eigen states and thus we get only a single value as an outcome of the measurement.Quantum measurement problem seeks to find the cause and exact mechanism governing this transformation.In an attempt to solve the above problem, in this paper, we will first define what the wave function represents in real-world and will identify the root cause behind the stochastic nature of events.Then, we will develop a model to explain the mechanism of collapse of the quantum mechanical wave function in response to a measurement.In the process of development of model, we will explain Schrodinger cat paradox and will show how Born's rule for probability becomes a natural consequence of the measurement process.
Introduction In a very elegant and rigorous paper, K. Hepp has discussed quantum measurement theory. He uses the C * algebra description of infinite quantum systems. Here an attempt is made to give a more popular account of some of his reasoning. Such an attempt seems worthwhile because many people not familiar with the C * algebra approach, and even somewhat intimidated by it, have been intrigued by the following statement in Hepp's abstract: In several explicitly soluble models, the measurement leads to macroscopically different ‘pointer positions’ and to a rigorous ‘reduction of the wave packet’ with respect to all local observables. This could look like a clean solution at last to the infamous measurement problem. But it is not so, nor thought by Hepp to be so. Here we will take one of his models and analyse it in elementary text-book terms. It will be insisted that the ‘rigorous reduction’ does not occur in physical time but only in an unattainable mathematical limit. It will be argued that the distinction is an important one. We will work at first in the Schrödinger picture, but later, with the extension to relativistic systems in mind, it will be argued that such considerations become particularly clear in the Heisenberg picture.
One of the major concerns of Schr\"odinger, Lorentz, Einstein, and many others about the wave function is that it is defined on the
3N-dimensional configuration space, rather than on the three-dimensional (3D) physical space. This gives the impression that quantum mechanics cannot have a
3D space or space-time ontology, even in the absence of quantum measurements. In particular, this seems to affect interpretations which take the wave function as a physical entity, in particular, the many-worlds and the spontaneous collapse interpretations, and some versions of the pilot wave theory. Here, a representation of the many-particle states is given, as multilayered fields defined on the three-dimensional physical space. This representation is equivalent to the usual representation on the configuration space, but it makes it explicit that it is possible to interpret the wave functions as defined on the physical space. As long as only unitary evolution is involved, the interactions are local. I intended this representation to capture and formalize the nonexplicit and informal intuition of many working quantum physicists, who, by considering the wave function sometimes to be defined on the configuration space and sometimes on the physical space, may seem to researchers in the foundations of quantum theory as adopting an inconsistent view about its ontology. This representation does not aim to solve the measurement problem, and it allows for Schr\"odinger cats just like the usual one. But, it may help various interpretations to solve these problems, through inclusion of the wave function as (part of) their primitive ontology. In appendices, it is shown how the multilayered field representation can be extended to quantum field theory.
We propose a double-slit photon interference experiment conducted across three gravitational conditions (1g, ~0g, 0.16g) to test whether gravitational field strength modulates wave function collapse behaviour. This proposal does not assume wave function collapse is ontologically real; it tests whether effective collapse behaviour—operationalised as interference fringe visibility and decoherence rate—varies with gravitational context. A secondary experiment introduces information accessibility as a variable, testing whether the causal availability of which-path information affects collapse statistics differently across gravitational conditions. Null results would place strong upper bounds on gravitationally induced collapse models, constraining Penrose-type theories. Positive results would provide the first direct experimental evidence for a gravitational component in quantum state reduction. Keywords: wave function collapse, quantum decoherence, gravity, Penrose objective reduction, measurement problem, double-slit experiment, microgravity