Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2206.10741

A note on the quantum measurement problem

N. David Mermin

Published Jun 21, 2022• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The idea that wave-function collapse is a physical process stems from a misunderstanding of probability and the role it plays in quantum mechanics.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2206.10741

Related papers

There is no quantum measurement problem

N. David Mermin

The idea that the collapse of a quantum state is a physical process stems from a misunderstanding of probability and the role it plays in quantum mechanics.

Physics Today•Jun 1, 2022•32 citations

The Quantum Measurement Problem: Collapse of the Wave Function Explained

Rochelle Forrester

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Bohr, objectivity, and "our experience": À propos Mermin's note on the quantum measurement problem

Ulrich Mohrhoff

In a recent note David Mermin attributed the idea that wave function collapse is a physical process to a misunderstanding of probability and the role it plays in quantum mechanics. There are, however, further misconceptions at play, some of which are shared by Mermin himself and more generally by QBists. The main objective of the present comment on his note is to explain why I disagree with his reading of a well-known passage by Niels Bohr, in particular the ambiguity of the first-person plural he perceives in Bohr's reference to "our description of nature" and "our experience."

arXiv:2210.13980•Oct 22, 2022•0 citations

"Analytical and numerical study of some problems in nonlinear mechanics"

Ibtihal Mohammed ALSalem

This study deals with the topic of “Analytical and numerical study of some problems in nonlinear mechanics.” The study aimed to analyze a problem in nonlinear mechanics, which is “wave function collapse.” Which is represented by the laboratory experiment "Schrödinger's cat", the interpretations of Heisenberg and Copenhagen, and an application of the method of Lagrange's equations to explain the phenomenon of wave function collapse and the EPR paradox, and Einstein's interpretation in pure algebraic theory and his interpretation of wave collapse, in addition to the Schrödinger equation. The study concluded with a set of results, the most important of which are: that the problem Wave function collapse represents one of the measurement problems in quantum mechanics. It has been proven that it can be solved based on quantum mechanics and does not require any additional assumptions or new theories. The processes of particle creation and annihilation described based on quantum field theory play a major role in measurement processes. Decoherence theory also refers to the creation and annihilation of particles and these processes are a nonlinear consequence of quantum mechanics, in which case the wave function collapse term becomes a consequence of other statements of quantum mechanics rather than a separate assumption of quantum mechanics.

Mağallaẗ Al-Qirā'aẗ wa Al-Maʿrifaẗ/Mağallaẗ Al-Qirā'aẗ wa Al-Maʿrifaẗ•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Comment on the observability of the “collapse” of the wavefunction in quantum measurements

Vladimir Hnizdo

Physics Letters A•Mar 1, 1987•1 citation

An irreversible act

Jim Baggott

Abstract If we are not persuaded of the approach to recovering causality in quantum physics through the de Broglie-Bohm theory (perhaps because, like Einstein, we think this route ‘too cheap’) or Popper’s reinterpretation of the meaning of probability, we must seek alternative solutions to the problems of quantum probability and the collapse of the wave function. Even if we choose to accept what quantum probability tells us concerning the fundamental indeterminism and acausality of the quantum world, we are still left to trouble over quantum measurement.

•Nov 6, 2003•0 citations
In a recent note David Mermin attributed the idea that wave function collapse is a physical process to a misunderstanding of probability and the role it plays in quantum mechanics. There are, however, further misconceptions at play, some of which are shared by Mermin himself and more generally by QBists. The main objective of the present comment on his note is to explain why I disagree with his reading of a well-known passage by Niels Bohr, in particular the ambiguity of the first-person plural he perceives in Bohr's reference to "our description of nature" and "our experience."
This study deals with the topic of “Analytical and numerical study of some problems in nonlinear mechanics.” The study aimed to analyze a problem in nonlinear mechanics, which is “wave function collapse.” Which is represented by the laboratory experiment "Schrödinger's cat", the interpretations of Heisenberg and Copenhagen, and an application of the method of Lagrange's equations to explain the phenomenon of wave function collapse and the EPR paradox, and Einstein's interpretation in pure algebraic theory and his interpretation of wave collapse, in addition to the Schrödinger equation. The study concluded with a set of results, the most important of which are: that the problem Wave function collapse represents one of the measurement problems in quantum mechanics. It has been proven that it can be solved based on quantum mechanics and does not require any additional assumptions or new theories. The processes of particle creation and annihilation described based on quantum field theory play a major role in measurement processes. Decoherence theory also refers to the creation and annihilation of particles and these processes are a nonlinear consequence of quantum mechanics, in which case the wave function collapse term becomes a consequence of other statements of quantum mechanics rather than a separate assumption of quantum mechanics.
Abstract If we are not persuaded of the approach to recovering causality in quantum physics through the de Broglie-Bohm theory (perhaps because, like Einstein, we think this route ‘too cheap’) or Popper’s reinterpretation of the meaning of probability, we must seek alternative solutions to the problems of quantum probability and the collapse of the wave function. Even if we choose to accept what quantum probability tells us concerning the fundamental indeterminism and acausality of the quantum world, we are still left to trouble over quantum measurement.