Machine learning (ML) is often listed among the most potential applications for quantum computing. This is in reality a puzzling choice: Nowadays machine learning algorithms are extremely powerful in practice, but still theoretically challenging to understand. Quantum computing, in contrast, does not give actual benchmarks on practical scales. However, theory remains the main tool we have to determine if it may become important for a task. Although it is far from reaching its full potential, nevertheless, it presents several techniques to efficiently deal with the problem which are tough to solve traditionally. In this perspective we deploy the Quanvolutional Neural Networks (QNNs) on a quantum computer to recognize handwritten digits, and compare its performance with that of its classical counterpart namely the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). We used a quanvolutional layer to separate the pixel data and demonstrate the advantage of applying QNN on a quantum computer. Finally, we implement the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC) and several classical classifiers built on the Iris dataset, in order to compare their accuracies. We employed amplitude encoding to map data into the large Hilbert space of a quantum computer. The results revealed that the QNN model and VQC had high accuracy and low loss value compared to their purely classical counterparts.
Machine learning (ML) is often listed among the most potential applications for quantum computing. This is in reality a puzzling choice: Nowadays machine learning algorithms are extremely powerful in practice, but still theoretically challenging to understand. Quantum computing, in contrast, does not give actual benchmarks on practical scales. However, theory remains the main tool we have to determine if it may become important for a task. Although it is far from reaching its full potential, nevertheless, it presents several techniques to efficiently deal with the problem which are tough to solve traditionally. In this perspective we deploy the Quanvolutional Neural Networks (QNNs) on a quantum computer to recognize handwritten digits, and compare its performance with that of its classical counterpart namely the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). We used a quanvolutional layer to separate the pixel data and demonstrate the advantage of applying QNN on a quantum computer. Finally, we implement the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC) and several classical classifiers built on the Iris dataset, in order to compare their accuracies. We employed amplitude encoding to map data into the large Hilbert space of a quantum computer. The results revealed that the QNN model and VQC had high accuracy and low loss value compared to their purely classical counterparts.
Despite its undeniable success, classical machine learning remains a resource-intensive process. Practical computational efforts for training state-of-the-art models can now only be handled by high speed computer hardware. As this trend is expected to continue, it should come as no surprise that an increasing number of machine learning researchers are investigating the possible advantages of quantum computing. The scientific literature on Quantum Machine Learning is now enormous, and a review of its current state that can be comprehended without a physics background is necessary. The objective of this study is to present a review of Quantum Machine Learning from the perspective of conventional techniques. Departing from giving a research path from fundamental quantum theory through Quantum Machine Learning algorithms from a computer scientist's perspective, we discuss a set of basic algorithms for Quantum Machine Learning, which are the fundamental components for Quantum Machine Learning algorithms. We implement the Quanvolutional Neural Networks (QNNs) on a quantum computer to recognize handwritten digits, and compare its performance to that of its classical counterpart, the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Additionally, we implement the QSVM on the breast cancer dataset and compare it to the classical SVM. Finally, we implement the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC) and many classical classifiers on the Iris dataset to compare their accuracies.
Quantum Computing (QC) was born as a purely theoretical subject. Thus, in the beginning, the main category of researchers in the area was physicists and mathematicians. Since IBM introduced the first quantum computer, global interest in this emerging technology has been growing more and more, involving computer science and engineering researchers. Machine learning is another rapidly growing technology, used in a wide range of applications where traditional computing is not sufficient. The two technologies are merged in the thesis work. The different ways in which a combination of them can occur are discussed, as well as the explanation why there is not a single definition of Quantum Machine Learning (QML). Firstly, quantum computing is examined in depth. The basic elements of quantum computation theory, based on the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, are introduced. The attention is focused on the qubit description on the Bloch sphere, the fundamental quantum gates, and examples of quantum algorithms. Therefore, the differences between quantum simulators and quantum processors are analysed, including the frameworks that provide tools to interact with them. Focusing on Quantum Machine Learning, the different definitions of the technology are described. There are four distinct approaches that are differentiated by the type of data used (quantum or classical) and by the device processing them (quantum or classical). In this thesis, QML is defined as the approach that uses classical data to feed a quantum device. The two possible methods for developing QML algorithms are: 1) to translate existing classical models into the terms of quantum computing; 2) to leave the existing models of classical machine learning completely, and explore new possible ways of doing QML to take full advantage of the physical characteristics of a quantum computer. The strategy adopted is the first one, thus it is used a state-of-the-art hybrid model of Quanvolutional Neural Network (QNN), composed of both quanvolutional and classical convolutional layers. The quanvolutional layers reproduce the same concept of the classical ones: they are made of quantum filters that generate feature maps through locally transforming input data. The transformation can be performed by variational quantum circuits or random quantum circuits. The specific field where Quantum Machine Learning is applied is image classification. The considered case study is a labeled dataset with X-ray images of lungs (labels: pneumonia, normal). The images are pre-processed and cropped for being used by quantum circuits, thus some information is lost. The main aim of the thesis is to understand whether and in which ways Quantum Machine Learning could bring advantages in the mentioned classification in terms of timing, accuracy, or dataset reduction, despite the large decrease in images' resolution. Different configurations of the hybrid model (with a different number of quantum filters and different settings of convolutional layers) are analysed and tested. The current quantum devices have many limitations, thus the time is still immature to observe a significant change in perspective. Nevertheless, the obtained results are promising for the future of QML in terms of dataset and hyperparameters reduction.
Quantum-enhanced techniques are widely employed to address machine learning difficulties. This work compares Support Vector Classifier (SVC) with Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC) on the Iris dataset, a typical machine learning benchmark. This study compares the performance, accuracy, and efficiency of two approaches: classical computing and quantum computing. The paper emphasizes the positive and negative aspects of each method, as well as practical data demonstrating quantum computing's potential for bettering machine learning tasks. This comparison offers helpful perspectives into the practical applications of quantum algorithms, providing an enhanced awareness of quantum machine learning's abilities and possibilities.
As the limits of classical machine learning (ML) become increasingly evident—especially in terms of computational scalability and data processing—quantum computing emerges as a promising frontier capable of addressing these challenges. Quantum Machine Learning (QML) represents the intersection of quantum computing and traditional ML, aiming to leverage quantum phenomena such as superposition, entanglement, and quantum parallelism to enhance learning capabilities, accelerate training, and solve complex problems that are intractable for classical algorithms. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving field of QML, beginning with the theoretical foundations of quantum computing and its synergy with classical machine learning principles. We explore key QML algorithms, including quantum support vector machines (QSVM), variational quantum classifiers (VQC), quantum neural networks (QNN), and hybrid quantum-classical approaches that exemplify the practical integration of both paradigms. We further examine real-world applications of QML across domains such as drug discovery, finance, climate modeling, and optimization, where quantum enhancements have begun to show early but promising results. Despite its theoretical potential, QML faces substantial limitations, including quantum hardware instability, limited qubit scalability, noise sensitivity, and unresolved challenges in quantum data encoding and interpretability. In synthesizing recent advancements and persistent obstacles, this paper highlights the importance of continued interdisciplinary research, algorithmic refinement, and hardware evolution. We also outline future directions that could lead QML from experimental promise to practical utility, including developments in quantum error correction, benchmarking standards, and application-specific quantum architectures
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as a compelling research domain that unites quantum computing principles with classical learning theory to address computationally demanding classification problems.This paper investigates two principal QML architectures-Variational Quantum Classifiers (VQC) and Quantum Neural Networks (QNN)-within the context of binary classification.We present an end-to-end hybrid quantum-classical pipeline applied to the UCI Mushroom dataset, comprising 22 categorical attributes, and demonstrate that quantumenhanced models can achieve competitive classification performance under present-day hardware constraints.The pipeline integrates Quantum Random Access Code (QRAC) encoding for dimensionality reduction, ZZFeatureMapbased quantum feature mapping, RealAmplitudes parameterized ansatz, and classical optimizer-driven parameter updates using the COBYLA algorithm.The complete system is deployed through a Flask web interface and containerized with Docker for reproducibility.Experimental results on a quantum simulator indicate a classification accuracy of 87.4%, precision of 0.891, and recall of 0.863, establishing the practical viability of NISQ-era quantum classifiers for structured categorical data.The paper further analyzes convergence behavior, circuit depth effects, and comparative performance against classical baselines, providing insights into the strengths and limitations of current QML architectures for real-world classification deployment.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as an interdisciplinary field that harnesses the potential of quantum computing to revolutionize classical machine learning paradigms. This paper presents a benchmarking study focused on four quantum classifier algorithms: Quantum Support Vector Classifier (QSVC), Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC), Quantum Neural Network Classifier (QNNC) and Pegasos Quantum Support Vector Classifier (PegasosQSVC). These quantum classifiers hold promise for unlocking quantum advantages in classification tasks. However, a systematic assessment of their performance across diverse datasets is yet to be fully explored. In this research study, we evaluate and compare the classification performance of quantum machine learning classifiers on various datasets (Breast Cancer, Diabetes, and Titanic) and compare them to a classical model. Our findings revealed that PegasosQSVC consistently maintained high performance across all datasets with the highest average accuracy, recall, and F1-score values of 0.81, 0.72, and 0.71, respectively, followed by VQC, followed by VQC, while QSVC and QNNC perform variably. Nevertheless, QSVC was found to balance performance and training time, achieving an average accuracy of 0.81 and a training time of 177 seconds. Overall, the classical model surpassed QML models as it was up to 10% higher in average accuracy.