Quantum Entanglement: Myth or Reality ?

Oleg V. Yermakov

This article proposes a philosophical interpretation of quantum physics and myth as two complementary limit-languages of describing reality. Quantum mechanics is considered as a maximally formalized, impersonal framework for articulating the non-classical relational structure of physical reality. Myth is interpreted as an imagistic and experiential mode of engaging with a similar notion of wholeness. It is argued that the human subject, within a mythological ontology, should not be understood as an autonomous entity but as a relational node within a broader structure of reality. The article situates this proposal in relation to major interpretations of quantum mechanics, including the Copenhagen interpretation, QBism, and relational quantum mechanics. Author portal: https://sites.google.com/view/yermakov-orcid

Hoshang Heydari

Victor Paromov

Calculation supremacy is expected for quantum computers operating with about 50 qubits. However, in case the non-classical spacetime geometry-based theory (http://vixra.org/abs/1806.0181) of particle interactions is right, entanglement exists for the observer-bound coordinate systems only, thus requiring additional control. If so, quantum supremacy would be hardly achievable.

Tim D. Reid

Paul Cummins

Vlatko Vedral