Quantum entanglement: No paradox

Aayush Verma

Md Anwarul Islam Aion

F. J. Duarte

Ever since Schrödinger envisioned the possibility of quantum entanglement, in 1935, by contemplating the implications of the meaning of ‘not complete’ emitted by Einstein and colleagues towards quantum mechanics the word paradox has been brought forth. Paradox was again invoked by Bohm in the 1950s and of course the creation of Bell's theorem was motivated by it. Paradox has been a trademark of the philosophical path towards quantum entanglement. And yet, the physics tells us that quantum entanglement is not afflicted at all by any paradox whatsoever. That this was the case was first silently implied by the physics of Dirac, Wheeler, and Pryce and Ward (1930–1947) and directly articulated by Feynman in 1965. Here we transparently show that, from the quantum interference perspective, the physics of quantum entanglement is completely and utterly free of paradoxes.

Zeno Toffano

Alexey V. Melkikh

Quantum entanglement is discussed as a consequence of the quantization of fields. The inclusion of quantum fields self-consistently explains some quantum paradoxes (EPR and Hardy’s paradox). The definition of entanglement was introduced, which depends on the maximum energy of the interaction of particles. The destruction of entanglement is caused by the creation and annihilation of particles. On this basis, an algorithm for quantum particle evolution was formulated.