Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics

Classical Limits of Light Quanta

Clara Valeria Fuchs, Thomas Filk A

Published Aug 22, 2022• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

It is argued that from a formal point of view, the classical limit of light quanta or photons is not that of a point-like particle but that of a geometric ray. According to this view, standard particle-wave dualism, which is often used in schools to describe the quantum behavior of massive objects, could be replaced by a ray-wave dualism (or even a particle-ray-wave trialism), which seems to be more appropriate for massless quantum objects such as photons. We compare the limits leading from quantum electrodynamics to a classical (Hamiltonian) theory of particles for electrons with those leading from photons via Maxwell’s equations to geometric ray optics. We also discuss the question to which extent Maxwell’s theory for electromagnetic waves should be considered as being on the same formal level as Schrödinger’s or Dirac’s theory.

DOI
10.3390/physics4030060

Related papers

Hamiltonian formulation of classical electrodynamics

M. Kira, S. W. Koch

At the conceptual level, the quantization procedure replaces the pure particle description of classical mechanics by a particle-wave treatment satisfying the requirements of the fundamental wave–particle dualism. Technically, one can always start from a generalized wave equation and use it as a basis to discuss wave-front propagation in the form of rays following classical particle trajectories, see Sections 2.2.1 and 3.1. Consequently, any wave theory inherently contains that aspect of the wave–particle dualism. Especially, Maxwell's equations of electrodynamic theory include both wave and particle aspects of electromagnetic fields. Hence, it could be that there are no additional “quantum,” i.e., wave–particle dualistic aspects. However, as we discuss in this chapter, Maxwell's equations can be expressed in the framework of Hamilton's formulation of particle mechanics. This then suggests that in addition to the approximate ray-like behavior, electromagnetic fields do have a supplementary level of particle-like properties. Due to the fundamental axiom of wave–particle dualism, the additional particle-like aspects of electromagnetic fields must then also have a wave counterpart that can be axiomatically introduced via the canonical quantization scheme described in Section 3.2.3. Since the spatial dependency in Maxwell's equation contains wave–particle dualism already at the classical level, it is clear that the new level of quantization cannot be a simple real-space feature but has to involve some other space describing the structure of the electromagnetic fields. In fact, this quantization yields several very concrete implications such as quantization of the light energy, elementary fluctuations in the light-field amplitude and intensity, and more.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 17, 2011•0 citations

Formal Quantum Theory of Light Rays

DETLEF GLOGE, Dietrich Marcuse

It is shown that the relation between ray optics and wave optics is analogous to the relation between the classical mechanics of a point particle and quantum mechanics. The time coordinate of quantum mechanics has to be replaced with a length coordinate and the light wavelength λ takes the place of Planck’s constant h. A well-known result of quantum mechanics is that it coincides with classical mechanics in the limit h → 0. Correspondingly, wave and ray optics must coincide in the limit λ → 0.

Journal of the Optical Society of America•Dec 1, 1969•169 citations

Summarizing what we know about the photon

Harry Paul

How can we construct a picture of the photon from the wealth of observation material available to us? The photon appears to have a split personality: it is neither a wave nor a particle but something else which, depending on the experimental situation, exhibits a wave- or a particle-like behavior. In other words, in the photon (as in material particles such as the electron) the particle–wave dualism becomes manifest. Whereas classically the wave and the particle pictures are separate, quantum mechanics accomplishes a formal synthesis through a unified mathematical treatment. Let us look first at the wave aspect familiar from classical electrodynamics, which seems to be the most natural description. It makes all the different interference phenomena understandable, such as the “interference of the photon with itself” on the one hand and the appearance of spatial and temporal intensity correlations in a thermal radiation field on the other (which are obviously brought about by superposition of elementary waves emitted independently from different atoms). It might come as a surprise (at least for those having quantum mechanical preconceptions) that the classical theory is valid down to arbitrarily small intensities: the visibility of the interference pattern does not deteriorate even for very small intensities – the zero point fluctuations of the electromagnetic field advocated by quantum mechanics do not have a disturbing effect – and is valid not only for conventional interference experiments but also for interference between independently generated light beams (in the form of laser light).

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 20, 2004•0 citations

The photon of the quantized electromagnetic field

Ole Keller

According to modern quantum field theory all elementary particles are quantum excitations of an underlying quantum field. In the case of the photon the underlying field is the electromagnetic field. In photon wave mechanics the photon concept was reached by a reinterpretation of the physical meaning of the free classical electromagnetic field. Such a reinterpretation does not give us a quantum theory of light quanta because the elementary quantum of action is foreign to classical physics. Although Planck’s constant does occur in the various Schro¨dinger-like wave equations we have presented in Part III it just plays the role of a multiplicative factor, see e.g., Eq. (10.36). The “justification” for bringing ~ into the formalism is the wish to make contact to the Einstein-de Broglie relations [Eqs. (10.40) and (10.41)]. In a sense one may call the light particle appearing from classical electrodynamics the classical photon.

CRC Press eBooks•May 13, 2014•0 citations

Relationship of quantum mechanics to classical electromagnetism and classical relativistic mechanics

J.H. Field

Some connections between quantum mechanics and classical physics are explored. The Planck–Einstein and De Broglie relations, the wavefunction and its probabilistic interpretation, the canonical commutation relations and the Maxwell–Lorentz equation may be understood in a simple way by comparing classical electromagnetism and the photonic description of light provided by classical relativistic kinematics. The method used may be described as 'inverse correspondence' since quantum phenomena become apparent on considering the low photon number density limit of classical electromagnetism. Generalization to massive particles leads to the Klein–Gordon and Schrödinger equations. The difference between the quantum wavefunction of the photon and a classical electromagnetic wave is discussed in some detail.

arXiv:physics/0403076•European Journal of Physics•Mar 18, 2004•15 citations

Remarks on the mathematical origin of wave mechanics and consequences for a quantum mechanics in a gravitational field

Mayeul Arminjon

According to Schroedinger's ideas, classical dynamics of point particles should correspond to the " geometrical optics " limit of a linear wave equation, in the same way as ray optics is the limit of wave optics. It is shown that, using notions of modern wave theory, the " geometrical optics " analogy leads to the correspondence between a classical Hamiltonian H and a " quantum " wave equation in a natural and general way. In particular, the correspondence is unambiguous also in the case where H contains mixed terms involving momentum and position. In the line of Schroedinger's ideas, it is also attempted to justify the occurrence, in QM, of eigenvalues problems, not merely for energy, but also for momentum. It is shown that the wave functions of pure momentum states can be defined in a physically more satisfying way than by assuming plane waves. In the case of a spatially uniform force field, such momentum states have a singularity and move undeformed according to Newton's second law. The mentioned unambiguous correspondence allows to uniquely extend the Klein-Gordon relativistic wave equation to the case where a constant gravitational field is present. It is argued that Schroedinger's wave mechanics can be extended to the case with a variable gravitational field only if one accepts that the wave equation is a preferred-frame one. From this viewpoint, generally-covariant extensions of the wave equations of QM seem rather formal. Finally, it is conjectured that there is no need for a quantum gravity.

arXiv:gr-qc/0203104•Mar 28, 2002•7 citations
It is argued that from a formal point of view, the classical limit of light quanta or photons is not that of a point-like particle but that of a geometric ray. According to this view, standard particle-wave dualism, which is often used in schools to describe the quantum behavior of massive objects, could be replaced by a ray-wave dualism (or even a particle-ray-wave trialism), which seems to be more appropriate for massless quantum objects such as photons. We compare the limits leading from quantum electrodynamics to a classical (Hamiltonian) theory of particles for electrons with those leading from photons via Maxwell’s equations to geometric ray optics. We also discuss the question to which extent Maxwell’s theory for electromagnetic waves should be considered as being on the same formal level as Schrödinger’s or Dirac’s theory.
At the conceptual level, the quantization procedure replaces the pure particle description of classical mechanics by a particle-wave treatment satisfying the requirements of the fundamental wave–particle dualism. Technically, one can always start from a generalized wave equation and use it as a basis to discuss wave-front propagation in the form of rays following classical particle trajectories, see Sections 2.2.1 and 3.1. Consequently, any wave theory inherently contains that aspect of the wave–particle dualism. Especially, Maxwell's equations of electrodynamic theory include both wave and particle aspects of electromagnetic fields. Hence, it could be that there are no additional “quantum,” i.e., wave–particle dualistic aspects. However, as we discuss in this chapter, Maxwell's equations can be expressed in the framework of Hamilton's formulation of particle mechanics. This then suggests that in addition to the approximate ray-like behavior, electromagnetic fields do have a supplementary level of particle-like properties. Due to the fundamental axiom of wave–particle dualism, the additional particle-like aspects of electromagnetic fields must then also have a wave counterpart that can be axiomatically introduced via the canonical quantization scheme described in Section 3.2.3. Since the spatial dependency in Maxwell's equation contains wave–particle dualism already at the classical level, it is clear that the new level of quantization cannot be a simple real-space feature but has to involve some other space describing the structure of the electromagnetic fields. In fact, this quantization yields several very concrete implications such as quantization of the light energy, elementary fluctuations in the light-field amplitude and intensity, and more.
It is shown that the relation between ray optics and wave optics is analogous to the relation between the classical mechanics of a point particle and quantum mechanics. The time coordinate of quantum mechanics has to be replaced with a length coordinate and the light wavelength λ takes the place of Planck’s constant h. A well-known result of quantum mechanics is that it coincides with classical mechanics in the limit h → 0. Correspondingly, wave and ray optics must coincide in the limit λ → 0.
How can we construct a picture of the photon from the wealth of observation material available to us? The photon appears to have a split personality: it is neither a wave nor a particle but something else which, depending on the experimental situation, exhibits a wave- or a particle-like behavior. In other words, in the photon (as in material particles such as the electron) the particle–wave dualism becomes manifest. Whereas classically the wave and the particle pictures are separate, quantum mechanics accomplishes a formal synthesis through a unified mathematical treatment. Let us look first at the wave aspect familiar from classical electrodynamics, which seems to be the most natural description. It makes all the different interference phenomena understandable, such as the “interference of the photon with itself” on the one hand and the appearance of spatial and temporal intensity correlations in a thermal radiation field on the other (which are obviously brought about by superposition of elementary waves emitted independently from different atoms). It might come as a surprise (at least for those having quantum mechanical preconceptions) that the classical theory is valid down to arbitrarily small intensities: the visibility of the interference pattern does not deteriorate even for very small intensities – the zero point fluctuations of the electromagnetic field advocated by quantum mechanics do not have a disturbing effect – and is valid not only for conventional interference experiments but also for interference between independently generated light beams (in the form of laser light).
According to modern quantum field theory all elementary particles are quantum excitations of an underlying quantum field. In the case of the photon the underlying field is the electromagnetic field. In photon wave mechanics the photon concept was reached by a reinterpretation of the physical meaning of the free classical electromagnetic field. Such a reinterpretation does not give us a quantum theory of light quanta because the elementary quantum of action is foreign to classical physics. Although Planck’s constant does occur in the various Schro¨dinger-like wave equations we have presented in Part III it just plays the role of a multiplicative factor, see e.g., Eq. (10.36). The “justification” for bringing ~ into the formalism is the wish to make contact to the Einstein-de Broglie relations [Eqs. (10.40) and (10.41)]. In a sense one may call the light particle appearing from classical electrodynamics the classical photon.
Some connections between quantum mechanics and classical physics are explored. The Planck–Einstein and De Broglie relations, the wavefunction and its probabilistic interpretation, the canonical commutation relations and the Maxwell–Lorentz equation may be understood in a simple way by comparing classical electromagnetism and the photonic description of light provided by classical relativistic kinematics. The method used may be described as 'inverse correspondence' since quantum phenomena become apparent on considering the low photon number density limit of classical electromagnetism. Generalization to massive particles leads to the Klein–Gordon and Schrödinger equations. The difference between the quantum wavefunction of the photon and a classical electromagnetic wave is discussed in some detail.
According to Schroedinger's ideas, classical dynamics of point particles should correspond to the " geometrical optics " limit of a linear wave equation, in the same way as ray optics is the limit of wave optics. It is shown that, using notions of modern wave theory, the " geometrical optics " analogy leads to the correspondence between a classical Hamiltonian H and a " quantum " wave equation in a natural and general way. In particular, the correspondence is unambiguous also in the case where H contains mixed terms involving momentum and position. In the line of Schroedinger's ideas, it is also attempted to justify the occurrence, in QM, of eigenvalues problems, not merely for energy, but also for momentum. It is shown that the wave functions of pure momentum states can be defined in a physically more satisfying way than by assuming plane waves. In the case of a spatially uniform force field, such momentum states have a singularity and move undeformed according to Newton's second law. The mentioned unambiguous correspondence allows to uniquely extend the Klein-Gordon relativistic wave equation to the case where a constant gravitational field is present. It is argued that Schroedinger's wave mechanics can be extended to the case with a variable gravitational field only if one accepts that the wave equation is a preferred-frame one. From this viewpoint, generally-covariant extensions of the wave equations of QM seem rather formal. Finally, it is conjectured that there is no need for a quantum gravity.