Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Hamiltonian formulation of classical electrodynamics

M. Kira, S. W. Koch

Published Nov 17, 2011• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

At the conceptual level, the quantization procedure replaces the pure particle description of classical mechanics by a particle-wave treatment satisfying the requirements of the fundamental wave–particle dualism. Technically, one can always start from a generalized wave equation and use it as a basis to discuss wave-front propagation in the form of rays following classical particle trajectories, see Sections 2.2.1 and 3.1. Consequently, any wave theory inherently contains that aspect of the wave–particle dualism. Especially, Maxwell's equations of electrodynamic theory include both wave and particle aspects of electromagnetic fields. Hence, it could be that there are no additional “quantum,” i.e., wave–particle dualistic aspects. However, as we discuss in this chapter, Maxwell's equations can be expressed in the framework of Hamilton's formulation of particle mechanics. This then suggests that in addition to the approximate ray-like behavior, electromagnetic fields do have a supplementary level of particle-like properties. Due to the fundamental axiom of wave–particle dualism, the additional particle-like aspects of electromagnetic fields must then also have a wave counterpart that can be axiomatically introduced via the canonical quantization scheme described in Section 3.2.3. Since the spatial dependency in Maxwell's equation contains wave–particle dualism already at the classical level, it is clear that the new level of quantization cannot be a simple real-space feature but has to involve some other space describing the structure of the electromagnetic fields. In fact, this quantization yields several very concrete implications such as quantization of the light energy, elementary fluctuations in the light-field amplitude and intensity, and more.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9781139016926.008

Related papers

Classical Limits of Light Quanta

Clara Valeria Fuchs, Thomas Filk A

It is argued that from a formal point of view, the classical limit of light quanta or photons is not that of a point-like particle but that of a geometric ray. According to this view, standard particle-wave dualism, which is often used in schools to describe the quantum behavior of massive objects, could be replaced by a ray-wave dualism (or even a particle-ray-wave trialism), which seems to be more appropriate for massless quantum objects such as photons. We compare the limits leading from quantum electrodynamics to a classical (Hamiltonian) theory of particles for electrons with those leading from photons via Maxwell’s equations to geometric ray optics. We also discuss the question to which extent Maxwell’s theory for electromagnetic waves should be considered as being on the same formal level as Schrödinger’s or Dirac’s theory.

Physics•Aug 22, 2022•1 citation

From classical to quantum mechanics: “How to translate physical ideas into mathematical language”

Hervé Bergeron

Following previous works by E. Prugovečki [Physica A 91A, 202 (1978) and Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)] on common features of classical and quantum mechanics, we develop a unified mathematical framework for classical and quantum mechanics (based on L2-spaces over classical phase space), in order to investigate to what extent quantum mechanics can be obtained as a simple modification of classical mechanics (on both logical and analytical levels). To obtain this unified framework, we split quantum theory in two parts: (i) general quantum axiomatics (a system is described by a state in a Hilbert space, observables are self-adjoints operators, and so on) and (ii) quantum mechanics proper that specifies the Hilbert space as L2(Rn); the Heisenberg rule [pi,qj]=−iℏδij with p=−iℏ∇, the free Hamiltonian H=−ℏ2Δ/2m and so on. We show that general quantum axiomatics (up to a supplementary “axiom of classicity”) can be used as a nonstandard mathematical ground to formulate physical ideas and equations of ordinary classical statistical mechanics. So, the question of a “true quantization” with “ℏ” must be seen as an independent physical problem not directly related with quantum formalism. At this stage, we show that this nonstandard formulation of classical mechanics exhibits a new kind of operation that has no classical counterpart: this operation is related to the “quantization process,” and we show why quantization physically depends on group theory (the Galilei group). This analytical procedure of quantization replaces the “correspondence principle” (or canonical quantization) and allows us to map classical mechanics into quantum mechanics, giving all operators of quantum dynamics and the Schrödinger equation. The great advantage of this point of view is that quantization is based on concrete physical arguments and not derived from some “pure algebraic rule” (we exhibit also some limit of the correspondence principle). Moreover spins for particles are naturally generated, including an approximation of their interaction with magnetic fields. We also recover by this approach the semi-classical formalism developed by E. Prugovečki [Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)].

arXiv:quant-ph/0102084•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 2001•12 citations

General Description and Quantization of EM Fields

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

We will begin our journey through the background of quantum optics with an elementary, but quantitative, classical theory of radiative fields.Wewill first briefly outline the electromagnetic (EM) theory of radiation, and describe how the EM radiation may be understood as a wavewhich can be represented by a set of harmonic oscillators. We shall describe how the free or non-interacting EM field may be understood as a collection of harmonic oscillators which is quantized in the standard manner, and whose energy cannot be zero as a consequence of the basic non-commutability of the canonical field variables. This chapter discusses the properties of plane EM waves and normalization of the EM field in one dimension. This is followed by a description of the Hamiltonian and the amplitudes of the EM field in terms of the annihilation and creation operators. Based on this chapter, it is possible to considerably simplify the formulation of the physical basis for the mathematical description of the major problems of quantum optics.

•Apr 19, 2016•0 citations

Quantum electrodynamics

Monique Combescot, Shiue-Yuan Shiau

Abstract In the chapter « Quantum electrodynamics », both the particles and the electromagnetic field are quantized. An elementary quantization procedure is first proposed in which the classical field normal modes are naïvely replaced by photon operators. The full quantization procedure is then presented that makes use of the Lagrangian formalism and the resulting Hamilton equations. This chapter ends with a discussion on photon number states and coherent Glauber states.

•Aug 5, 2026•0 citations

Summarizing what we know about the photon

Harry Paul

How can we construct a picture of the photon from the wealth of observation material available to us? The photon appears to have a split personality: it is neither a wave nor a particle but something else which, depending on the experimental situation, exhibits a wave- or a particle-like behavior. In other words, in the photon (as in material particles such as the electron) the particle–wave dualism becomes manifest. Whereas classically the wave and the particle pictures are separate, quantum mechanics accomplishes a formal synthesis through a unified mathematical treatment. Let us look first at the wave aspect familiar from classical electrodynamics, which seems to be the most natural description. It makes all the different interference phenomena understandable, such as the “interference of the photon with itself” on the one hand and the appearance of spatial and temporal intensity correlations in a thermal radiation field on the other (which are obviously brought about by superposition of elementary waves emitted independently from different atoms). It might come as a surprise (at least for those having quantum mechanical preconceptions) that the classical theory is valid down to arbitrarily small intensities: the visibility of the interference pattern does not deteriorate even for very small intensities – the zero point fluctuations of the electromagnetic field advocated by quantum mechanics do not have a disturbing effect – and is valid not only for conventional interference experiments but also for interference between independently generated light beams (in the form of laser light).

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 20, 2004•0 citations

Source-Free Electromagnetism's Canonical Fields Reveal the Free-Photon Schrödinger Equation

Steven Kenneth Kauffmann

Classical equations of motion that are first-order in time and conserve energy can only be quantized after their variables have been transformed to canonical ones, i.e., variables in which the energy is the system's Hamiltonian. The source-free version of Maxwell's equations is purely dynamical, first-order in time and has well-defined nonnegative conserved field energy but is decidedly noncanonical. That should long ago have made source-free Maxwell equation canonical Hamiltonization a research priority, and afterward, standard textbook fare, but textbooks seem unaware of the issue. The opposite parities of the electric and magnetic fields and consequent curl operations that typify Maxwell's equations are especially at odds with their being canonical fields. Transformation of the magnetic field into the transverse part of the vector potential helps but is not sufficient; further simple nonnegative symmetric integral transforms, which commute with all differential operators, are needed for both fields; such transforms also supplant the curls in the equations of motion. The canonical replacements of the source-free electromagnetic fields remain transverse-vector fields, but are more diffuse than their predecessors, albeit less diffuse than the transverse vector potential. Combined as the real and imaginary parts of a complex field, the canonical fields prove to be the transverse-vector wave function of a time-dependent Schrodinger equation whose Hamiltonian operator is the quantization of the free photon's square-root relativistic energy. Thus proper quantization of the source-free Maxwell equations is identical to second quantization of free photons that have normal square-root energy. There is no physical reason why first and second quantization of any relativistic free particle ought not to proceed in precise parallel, utilizing the square-root Hamiltonian operator. This natural procedure leaves no role for the completely artificial Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations, as accords with their grossly unphysical properties.

Prespacetime journal•Dec 1, 2010•0 citations
At the conceptual level, the quantization procedure replaces the pure particle description of classical mechanics by a particle-wave treatment satisfying the requirements of the fundamental wave–particle dualism. Technically, one can always start from a generalized wave equation and use it as a basis to discuss wave-front propagation in the form of rays following classical particle trajectories, see Sections 2.2.1 and 3.1. Consequently, any wave theory inherently contains that aspect of the wave–particle dualism. Especially, Maxwell's equations of electrodynamic theory include both wave and particle aspects of electromagnetic fields. Hence, it could be that there are no additional “quantum,” i.e., wave–particle dualistic aspects. However, as we discuss in this chapter, Maxwell's equations can be expressed in the framework of Hamilton's formulation of particle mechanics. This then suggests that in addition to the approximate ray-like behavior, electromagnetic fields do have a supplementary level of particle-like properties. Due to the fundamental axiom of wave–particle dualism, the additional particle-like aspects of electromagnetic fields must then also have a wave counterpart that can be axiomatically introduced via the canonical quantization scheme described in Section 3.2.3. Since the spatial dependency in Maxwell's equation contains wave–particle dualism already at the classical level, it is clear that the new level of quantization cannot be a simple real-space feature but has to involve some other space describing the structure of the electromagnetic fields. In fact, this quantization yields several very concrete implications such as quantization of the light energy, elementary fluctuations in the light-field amplitude and intensity, and more.
It is argued that from a formal point of view, the classical limit of light quanta or photons is not that of a point-like particle but that of a geometric ray. According to this view, standard particle-wave dualism, which is often used in schools to describe the quantum behavior of massive objects, could be replaced by a ray-wave dualism (or even a particle-ray-wave trialism), which seems to be more appropriate for massless quantum objects such as photons. We compare the limits leading from quantum electrodynamics to a classical (Hamiltonian) theory of particles for electrons with those leading from photons via Maxwell’s equations to geometric ray optics. We also discuss the question to which extent Maxwell’s theory for electromagnetic waves should be considered as being on the same formal level as Schrödinger’s or Dirac’s theory.
Following previous works by E. Prugovečki [Physica A 91A, 202 (1978) and Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)] on common features of classical and quantum mechanics, we develop a unified mathematical framework for classical and quantum mechanics (based on L2-spaces over classical phase space), in order to investigate to what extent quantum mechanics can be obtained as a simple modification of classical mechanics (on both logical and analytical levels). To obtain this unified framework, we split quantum theory in two parts: (i) general quantum axiomatics (a system is described by a state in a Hilbert space, observables are self-adjoints operators, and so on) and (ii) quantum mechanics proper that specifies the Hilbert space as L2(Rn); the Heisenberg rule [pi,qj]=−iℏδij with p=−iℏ∇, the free Hamiltonian H=−ℏ2Δ/2m and so on. We show that general quantum axiomatics (up to a supplementary “axiom of classicity”) can be used as a nonstandard mathematical ground to formulate physical ideas and equations of ordinary classical statistical mechanics. So, the question of a “true quantization” with “ℏ” must be seen as an independent physical problem not directly related with quantum formalism. At this stage, we show that this nonstandard formulation of classical mechanics exhibits a new kind of operation that has no classical counterpart: this operation is related to the “quantization process,” and we show why quantization physically depends on group theory (the Galilei group). This analytical procedure of quantization replaces the “correspondence principle” (or canonical quantization) and allows us to map classical mechanics into quantum mechanics, giving all operators of quantum dynamics and the Schrödinger equation. The great advantage of this point of view is that quantization is based on concrete physical arguments and not derived from some “pure algebraic rule” (we exhibit also some limit of the correspondence principle). Moreover spins for particles are naturally generated, including an approximation of their interaction with magnetic fields. We also recover by this approach the semi-classical formalism developed by E. Prugovečki [Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)].
We will begin our journey through the background of quantum optics with an elementary, but quantitative, classical theory of radiative fields.Wewill first briefly outline the electromagnetic (EM) theory of radiation, and describe how the EM radiation may be understood as a wavewhich can be represented by a set of harmonic oscillators. We shall describe how the free or non-interacting EM field may be understood as a collection of harmonic oscillators which is quantized in the standard manner, and whose energy cannot be zero as a consequence of the basic non-commutability of the canonical field variables. This chapter discusses the properties of plane EM waves and normalization of the EM field in one dimension. This is followed by a description of the Hamiltonian and the amplitudes of the EM field in terms of the annihilation and creation operators. Based on this chapter, it is possible to considerably simplify the formulation of the physical basis for the mathematical description of the major problems of quantum optics.
How can we construct a picture of the photon from the wealth of observation material available to us? The photon appears to have a split personality: it is neither a wave nor a particle but something else which, depending on the experimental situation, exhibits a wave- or a particle-like behavior. In other words, in the photon (as in material particles such as the electron) the particle–wave dualism becomes manifest. Whereas classically the wave and the particle pictures are separate, quantum mechanics accomplishes a formal synthesis through a unified mathematical treatment. Let us look first at the wave aspect familiar from classical electrodynamics, which seems to be the most natural description. It makes all the different interference phenomena understandable, such as the “interference of the photon with itself” on the one hand and the appearance of spatial and temporal intensity correlations in a thermal radiation field on the other (which are obviously brought about by superposition of elementary waves emitted independently from different atoms). It might come as a surprise (at least for those having quantum mechanical preconceptions) that the classical theory is valid down to arbitrarily small intensities: the visibility of the interference pattern does not deteriorate even for very small intensities – the zero point fluctuations of the electromagnetic field advocated by quantum mechanics do not have a disturbing effect – and is valid not only for conventional interference experiments but also for interference between independently generated light beams (in the form of laser light).
Classical equations of motion that are first-order in time and conserve energy can only be quantized after their variables have been transformed to canonical ones, i.e., variables in which the energy is the system's Hamiltonian. The source-free version of Maxwell's equations is purely dynamical, first-order in time and has well-defined nonnegative conserved field energy but is decidedly noncanonical. That should long ago have made source-free Maxwell equation canonical Hamiltonization a research priority, and afterward, standard textbook fare, but textbooks seem unaware of the issue. The opposite parities of the electric and magnetic fields and consequent curl operations that typify Maxwell's equations are especially at odds with their being canonical fields. Transformation of the magnetic field into the transverse part of the vector potential helps but is not sufficient; further simple nonnegative symmetric integral transforms, which commute with all differential operators, are needed for both fields; such transforms also supplant the curls in the equations of motion. The canonical replacements of the source-free electromagnetic fields remain transverse-vector fields, but are more diffuse than their predecessors, albeit less diffuse than the transverse vector potential. Combined as the real and imaginary parts of a complex field, the canonical fields prove to be the transverse-vector wave function of a time-dependent Schrodinger equation whose Hamiltonian operator is the quantization of the free photon's square-root relativistic energy. Thus proper quantization of the source-free Maxwell equations is identical to second quantization of free photons that have normal square-root energy. There is no physical reason why first and second quantization of any relativistic free particle ought not to proceed in precise parallel, utilizing the square-root Hamiltonian operator. This natural procedure leaves no role for the completely artificial Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations, as accords with their grossly unphysical properties.