Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Acta Optica Sinica

基于Rydberg原子的100 kHz~40 GHz超宽带射频传感器

杨凯 Yang Kai, 安强 An Qiang, 姚佳伟 Yao Jiawei, 毛瑞棋 Mao Ruiqi, 林沂 Lin Yi, 刘燚 Liu Yi, 付云起 Fu Yunqi

Published Jan 1, 2022• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.3788/aos202242.1528002

Related papers

Real time g (2) monitoring with 100 kHz sampling rate

Carolin Lüders, Johannes Thewes, Marc Assmann

(0)-sampling rate of 100 kHz.

arXiv:1806.10666•Optics Express•Sep 10, 2018•15 citations

光发射电子与原子分子高Rydberg态的产生

海洋 李, 吉玲 白, 日昌 吕 +1 more

Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version)•Jun 1, 1998•0 citations

Single-Photon Avalanche Diode with kHz Dark Count Rates at Room Temperature for O-Band QKD

Elisa Collin, Pascal Rustige, Patrick Runge +1 more

By switching from InGaAs to InGaAsP we improve the SPAD dark count rate from 18 kHz to 4.9 kHz for a photon detection efficiency of 20% at 293 K in the O-band. Intrinsic C-band suppression is 18.5 dB.

European Conference on Optical Communication•Sep 28, 2025•0 citations

Sm原子奇宇称Rydberg态光谱

XU Zhao-jin, ZHANG Xiao-hu, ZHANG Wen-na +2 more

Chinese Journal of Luminescence•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Optomechanical Calibration of the Quantum Precision Holonomy Magnetic Laplacian Physical Units, Held-Out Spectral Tests, and the Quadratic Flux-Gap Law

Paweł Krzysztof Chomiuk

The companion theory paper Quantum Precision Holonomy constructs a magnetic graph Laplacian LU from inverse GNS-Gramian data and proves a quadratic opening law for its lowest eigenvalue. The present paper addresses a narrower physical question: what does the dimensionless operator mean, and how is it assigned physical units in a system where the same operator class is an actual Hamiltonian? We use the programmable nano-optomechanical network of Slim, del Pino, and Verhagen. In the opposed-flux diamond at the special ratio Jc = √ 2J, one antisymmetric apex mode decouples and the remaining three modes are exactly those of an equal-coupling Aharonov– Bohm loop. For the unit-weight magnetic triangle, LU = 2I − AU , and the experimentally realized coupled-mode Hamiltonian satisfies Hphys h = νrefI + jeff(2I − LU ). Thus spectral splittings are linear in differences of eigenvalues of LU ; no particle-mass map is introduced. The independently reported perimeter coupling is J/(2π) = 5.000 kHz, implying jeff = 7.071 067 812 kHz. A one-parameter calibration on ten digitized gaps gives jeff = 6.877 941 342 kHz and hence J/(2π) = 4.863 438 964 kHz, a difference of −2.731%. On nine frozen held-out gaps, MAE = 0.344 229 kHz and RMSE = 0.423 010 kHz. The raster scale is approximately 0.303 kHz per vertical pixel; reported mechanical linewidths are approximately 1 kHz to 7 kHz. The small-flux QPH law becomes ∆νQPH = jeff 9 Φ 2 + O(Φ4 ), with independently calibrated coefficient 0.785 674 201 kHz rad−2 . This is a figure-level held- out consistency test of the downstream map (G, w, U) → LU → physical spectrum. It does not test the upstream derivation of (w, U) from a measured complex GNS Gramian. Keywords: magnetic graph Laplacian; optomechanics; Aharonov–Bohm phase; spectral calibra- tion; held-out test; Quantum Precision Holonomy. Scope. This paper is a self-contained empirical companion to the mathematical QPH paper. It defines every object needed for the calibration, derives the C3 spectral map, freezes one fit parameter and a prospective train/test split, and reports physical units and held-out errors. It does not repeat the full inverse-GNS-Gramian proofs and does not claim that the

•Aug 15, 2026•0 citations

有機媒質中の分子の“Rydberg”状態からの発光

Yoshihiro Nakato, Hiroshi Tsubomura

Journal of Luminescence•Jan 1, 1976•0 citations
The companion theory paper Quantum Precision Holonomy constructs a magnetic graph Laplacian LU from inverse GNS-Gramian data and proves a quadratic opening law for its lowest eigenvalue. The present paper addresses a narrower physical question: what does the dimensionless operator mean, and how is it assigned physical units in a system where the same operator class is an actual Hamiltonian? We use the programmable nano-optomechanical network of Slim, del Pino, and Verhagen. In the opposed-flux diamond at the special ratio Jc = √ 2J, one antisymmetric apex mode decouples and the remaining three modes are exactly those of an equal-coupling Aharonov– Bohm loop. For the unit-weight magnetic triangle, LU = 2I − AU , and the experimentally realized coupled-mode Hamiltonian satisfies Hphys h = νrefI + jeff(2I − LU ). Thus spectral splittings are linear in differences of eigenvalues of LU ; no particle-mass map is introduced. The independently reported perimeter coupling is J/(2π) = 5.000 kHz, implying jeff = 7.071 067 812 kHz. A one-parameter calibration on ten digitized gaps gives jeff = 6.877 941 342 kHz and hence J/(2π) = 4.863 438 964 kHz, a difference of −2.731%. On nine frozen held-out gaps, MAE = 0.344 229 kHz and RMSE = 0.423 010 kHz. The raster scale is approximately 0.303 kHz per vertical pixel; reported mechanical linewidths are approximately 1 kHz to 7 kHz. The small-flux QPH law becomes ∆νQPH = jeff 9 Φ 2 + O(Φ4 ), with independently calibrated coefficient 0.785 674 201 kHz rad−2 . This is a figure-level held- out consistency test of the downstream map (G, w, U) → LU → physical spectrum. It does not test the upstream derivation of (w, U) from a measured complex GNS Gramian. Keywords: magnetic graph Laplacian; optomechanics; Aharonov–Bohm phase; spectral calibra- tion; held-out test; Quantum Precision Holonomy. Scope. This paper is a self-contained empirical companion to the mathematical QPH paper. It defines every object needed for the calibration, derives the C3 spectral map, freezes one fit parameter and a prospective train/test split, and reports physical units and held-out errors. It does not repeat the full inverse-GNS-Gramian proofs and does not claim that the