We propose a quantum-mechanical framework to describe the dynamics of human decision making, where the interactions between the open quantum system of decision makers and its surrounding environment at given temperature are relevantly taken into account. The temporal evolution of quantum system is described in terms of the time-dependent density matrix, from which we can evaluate those thermodynamic functions such as internal energy, (von Neumann) entropy and (Helmholtz) free energy. In this study we rely on the symmetrical quasi-classical (SQC) windowing approach to numerically solve the non-adiabatic quantum dynamics. We then consider the Hamiltonians to formulate the Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) problem and calculate the population dynamics of the quantum states of two players’ decisions, where some quantum coherence or interference effects are observed. The evaluated free energy tends to decrease toward the thermodynamic equilibrium value, thus driving the dynamics of quantum system between the Nash equilibrium and Pareto optimum states. The calculated entropy often shows a tendency of temporal decrease, thus indicating the emergence of order in the quantum system. We have also applied the present scheme to the issue of the violation of the sure thing principle and found its occurrence through explicit numerical simulations for the PD problem. The present study may provide a theoretical basis to connect the dynamics of quantum decision making to the free energy principle in cognitive science.
We propose a quantum-mechanical framework to describe the dynamics of human decision making, where the interactions between the open quantum system of decision makers and its surrounding environment at given temperature are relevantly taken into account. The temporal evolution of quantum system is described in terms of the time-dependent density matrix, from which we can evaluate those thermodynamic functions such as internal energy, (von Neumann) entropy and (Helmholtz) free energy. In this study we rely on the symmetrical quasi-classical (SQC) windowing approach to numerically solve the non-adiabatic quantum dynamics. We then consider the Hamiltonians to formulate the Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) problem and calculate the population dynamics of the quantum states of two players’ decisions, where some quantum coherence or interference effects are observed. The evaluated free energy tends to decrease toward the thermodynamic equilibrium value, thus driving the dynamics of quantum system between the Nash equilibrium and Pareto optimum states. The calculated entropy often shows a tendency of temporal decrease, thus indicating the emergence of order in the quantum system. We have also applied the present scheme to the issue of the violation of the sure thing principle and found its occurrence through explicit numerical simulations for the PD problem. The present study may provide a theoretical basis to connect the dynamics of quantum decision making to the free energy principle in cognitive science.
We review recent theoretical developments linking quantum-like cognition, nonequilibrium thermodynamics, and foundation of quantum mechanics. Empirical studies inpsychology and decision making reveal contextuality, order effects, and violations of classical probability theory that are naturally represented within a Hilbert-space formalism. While quantum-like models clarify how such non-classical structures describe cognitive phenomena, and the Free Energy Principle (FEP) explains why living systems perform variational inference, their conceptual integration has remained incomplete. We here explore a possibility of unifying these concepts in terms of temporally correlated “quantum” states. Reformulating variational free energy as quantum relative entropy, we show that open-system quantum decision models realize a quantum extension of the FEP. Using quantum state-over-time representations, we demonstrate that violations of Leggett–Garg inequalities admit an information-theoretic interpretation as strictly positive lower bounds on a macrorealism-restricted temporal free energy. Extending the framework of thermodynamics of prediction, temporal nonclassicality introduces an additional irreducible energetic cost beyond classical predictive inefficiency. We further examine both material (water–electromagnetic–phonon coherence) and stochastic-network foundations for quantum cognition and decision making, and propose that consciousness may be understood as non-collapsing variational inference sustained by temporally coherent organization in living systems.
This paper starts with surveying the evolution of quantum-like models of cognition and decision making, transitioning from static kinematic representations to a robust dynamical framework based on open quantum systems. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad (GKSL) master equation's application in cognitive psychology and decision making, illustrating how it models mental state evolution as a dissipative process influenced by an informational environment. We categorize dynamical regimes into Passive and Active Hamiltonians, demonstrating how non-commutation with projections on decision basis serves as a mathematical signature of cognitive agency and Quantum Escape from classical equilibria. The utility of this framework is further explored through its ability to stabilize non-Nash outcomes in strategic games, such as the Prisoner's Dilemma. Building upon this dynamical foundation, we identify ``cognitive beats'' as a signature of the internal struggle between competing ``flows of mind'' deliberated at approximately equal frequencies. Distinct from the damped oscillations of simple interference, these beats emerge from a structural tension between Liouvillian channels that generates a secondary, slow-scale modulation of conviction. This beat envelope dictates the timing of peak readiness and hesitation, providing a mathematical map of the transition between conflicting cognitive states. By resolving these nested time scales, we provide a new spectral diagnostic for the depth of cognitive agency and the complexity of the underlying deliberation process. This paper develops a theoretical framework linking GKSL dynamics with quantum-like cognition and decision-making (QCDM), highlighting how dissipative quantum models can capture features of human thought and decision processes.
In the theory of open quantum systems, a quantum Markovian master equation, the Lindblad equation, reveals the most general form for the generators of a quantum dynamical semigroup. In this thesis, we present the derivation of the Lindblad equation and several examples of Lindblad equations with their analytic and numerical solutions. The graphs of the numerical solutions illuminate the dynamics and the stabilization as time increases. The corresponding von Neumann entropies are also presented as graphs. Moreover, to illustrate the difference between the dynamics of open and isolated systems, we prove two theorems about the conditions for stabilization of the solutions of the von Neumann equation which describes the dynamics of the density matrix of open quantum systems. It shows that the von Neumann equation is not satisfied for modelling dynamics in the cognitive contextin general. Instead, we use the Lindblad equation to model the mental dynamics of the players in the game of the 2-player prisoner’s dilemma to explain the irrational behaviors of the players. The stabilizing solution will lead the mental dynamics to an equilibrium state, which is regarded as the termination of the comparison process for a decision maker. The resulting pure strategy is selected probabilistically by performing a quantum measurement. We also discuss two important concepts, quantum decoherence and quantum Darwinism. Finally, we mention a classical Neural Network Master Equation introduced by Cowan and plan our further works on an analogous version for the quantum neural network by using the Lindblad equation.
The application of the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics to model behavioral patterns in social science and economics is a novel and constantly emerging field. The aim of the so called 'quantum like' models is to model the decision making processes in a macroscopic setting, capturing the particular 'context' in which the decisions are taken. Several subsequent empirical findings proved that when making a decision people tend to violate the axioms of expected utility theory and Savage's Sure Thing principle, thus violating the law of total probability. A quantum probability formula was devised to describe more accurately the decision making processes. A next step in the development of QL-modeling in decision making was the application of Schrödinger equation to describe the evolution of people's mental states. A shortcoming of Schrödinger equation is its inability to capture dynamics of an open system; the brain of the decision maker can be regarded as such, actively interacting with the external environment. Recently the master equation, by which quantum physics describes the process of decoherence as the result of interaction of the mental state with the environmental 'bath', was introduced for modeling the human decision making. The external environment and memory can be referred to as a complex 'context' influencing the final decision outcomes. The master equation can be considered as a pioneering and promising apparatus for modeling the dynamics of decision making in different contexts.
In cognitive psychology, some experiments of games were reported [1, 2, 3, 4], and these demonstrated that real players did not use the "rational strategy" provided by classical game theory. To discuss probabilities of such "irrational choice", recently, we proposed a decision-making model which is based on the formalism of quantum mechanics [5, 6, 7, 8]. In this paper, we briefly explain the above model and calculate the probability of irrational choice in several prisoner's dilemma (PD) games.
This paper starts with surveying the evolution of quantum-like models of cognition and decision making, transitioning from static kinematic representations to a robust dynamical framework based on open quantum systems. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad (GKSL) master equation's application in cognitive psychology and decision making, illustrating how it models mental state evolution as a dissipative process influenced by an informational environment. We categorize dynamical regimes into Passive and Active Hamiltonians, demonstrating how non-commutation with projections on decision basis serves as a mathematical signature of cognitive agency and Quantum Escape from classical equilibria. The utility of this framework is further explored through its ability to stabilize non-Nash outcomes in strategic games, such as the Prisoner's Dilemma. Building upon this dynamical foundation, we identify ``cognitive beats'' as a signature of the internal struggle between competing ``flows of mind'' deliberated at approximately equal frequencies. Distinct from the damped oscillations of simple interference, these beats emerge from a structural tension between Liouvillian channels that generates a secondary, slow-scale modulation of conviction. This beat envelope dictates the timing of peak readiness and hesitation, providing a mathematical map of the transition between conflicting cognitive states. By resolving these nested time scales, we provide a new spectral diagnostic for the depth of cognitive agency and the complexity of the underlying deliberation process. This paper develops a theoretical framework linking GKSL dynamics with quantum-like cognition and decision-making (QCDM), highlighting how dissipative quantum models can capture features of human thought and decision processes.