Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Today

Addressing the quantum measurement problem

Sean M. Carroll

Published Jul 1, 2022• 10 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Attempts to solve the problem have led to a number of well-defined competing theories. Choosing between them might be crucial for progress in fundamental physics.
DOI
10.1063/pt.3.5046

Related papers

The two Problems of Quantum Measurement

Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics•Jan 1, 1973•8 citations

The Panvitalist Theory in the Context of Current Research in Quantum Gravity and the Foundations of Physics - An Assessment

Manfred U.E. Pohl

The theoretical physics community in 2026 remains deeply fragmented. Despite impressive technical progress in several directions, there is still no consensus on the foundations of quantum gravity. Multiple competing research programs coexist, each with its own conceptual framework, mathematical tools, and community. At the same time, public discourse on social media is increasingly shaped by simplified or misleading claims about fundamental issues such as the nature of time or the viability of specific unification attempts. This paper provides a structured assessment of the current landscape (as of early 2026) and situates the Panvitalist Theory (PVT) within it. The PVT is distinguished by a unique combination of features: it models the act of measurement as primary, redefines $\pi$ as a dimensioned quantity ($\pi \equiv T/L$), treats life as a fundamental mathematical axiom, provides an explicit model of free will, and offers a radical de-mathematization. These characteristics position the PVT as a fundamentally different approach that addresses several persistent problems of contemporary programs from a genuinely new foundational angle.

•May 2, 2026•0 citations

The Preferred-Basis Problem and the Quantum Mechanics of Everything

Jeffrey Alan Barrett

Jereon Vink ([1993]) argued that there are two options for what he called a realistic solution to the quantum measurement problem: (1) select a preferred set of observables for which definite values are assumed to exist, or (2) attempt to assign definite values to all observables simultaneously (1810–1). While conventional wisdom has it that the second option is ruled out by the Kochen-Specker theorem, Vink nevertheless advocated it. Making every physical quantity determinate in quantum mechanics carries with it significant conceptual costs, but it also provides a way of addressing the preferred basis problem that arises if one chooses to pursue the first option. The potential costs and benefits of a formulation of quantum mechanics where every physical quantity is determinate are herein examined. 1. The preferred-basis problem 2. How to solve the preferred-basis problem 3. Relativistic constraints 4. Conclusion

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•May 17, 2005•32 citations

A New Look at the Old Quantum Measurement Problem

Z. E. Musielak

•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Competing Ideas in Quantum Measurement: The Search for a Perfect ``Theory of Everything''

Melissa Schmitz

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Apr 14, 2018•0 citations

Operational Meanings of Orders of Observables Defined through Quantum Set Theories with Different Conditionals

Masanao Ozawa

In quantum logic there is well-known arbitrariness in choosing a binary operation for conditional. Currently, we have at least three candidates, called the Sasaki conditional, the contrapositive Sasaki conditional, and the relevance conditional. A fundamental problem is to show how the form of the conditional follows from an analysis of operational concepts in quantum theory. Here, we attempt such an analysis through quantum set theory (QST). In this paper, we develop quantum set theory based on quantum logics with those three conditionals, each of which defines different quantum logical truth value assignment. We show that those three models satisfy the transfer principle of the same form to determine the quantum logical truth values of theorems of the ZFC set theory. We also show that the reals in the model and the truth values of their equality are the same for those models. Interestingly, however, the order relation between quantum reals significantly depends on the underlying conditionals. We characterize the operational meanings of those order relations in terms of joint probability obtained by the successive projective measurements of arbitrary two observables. Those characterizations clearly show their individual features and will play a fundamental role in future applications to quantum physics.

arXiv:1701.00661•Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science•Jan 1, 2017•7 citations
The theoretical physics community in 2026 remains deeply fragmented. Despite impressive technical progress in several directions, there is still no consensus on the foundations of quantum gravity. Multiple competing research programs coexist, each with its own conceptual framework, mathematical tools, and community. At the same time, public discourse on social media is increasingly shaped by simplified or misleading claims about fundamental issues such as the nature of time or the viability of specific unification attempts. This paper provides a structured assessment of the current landscape (as of early 2026) and situates the Panvitalist Theory (PVT) within it. The PVT is distinguished by a unique combination of features: it models the act of measurement as primary, redefines π\piπ as a dimensioned quantity (π≡T/L\pi \equiv T/Lπ≡T/L), treats life as a fundamental mathematical axiom, provides an explicit model of free will, and offers a radical de-mathematization. These characteristics position the PVT as a fundamentally different approach that addresses several persistent problems of contemporary programs from a genuinely new foundational angle.
Jereon Vink ([1993]) argued that there are two options for what he called a realistic solution to the quantum measurement problem: (1) select a preferred set of observables for which definite values are assumed to exist, or (2) attempt to assign definite values to all observables simultaneously (1810–1). While conventional wisdom has it that the second option is ruled out by the Kochen-Specker theorem, Vink nevertheless advocated it. Making every physical quantity determinate in quantum mechanics carries with it significant conceptual costs, but it also provides a way of addressing the preferred basis problem that arises if one chooses to pursue the first option. The potential costs and benefits of a formulation of quantum mechanics where every physical quantity is determinate are herein examined. 1. The preferred-basis problem 2. How to solve the preferred-basis problem 3. Relativistic constraints 4. Conclusion
In quantum logic there is well-known arbitrariness in choosing a binary operation for conditional. Currently, we have at least three candidates, called the Sasaki conditional, the contrapositive Sasaki conditional, and the relevance conditional. A fundamental problem is to show how the form of the conditional follows from an analysis of operational concepts in quantum theory. Here, we attempt such an analysis through quantum set theory (QST). In this paper, we develop quantum set theory based on quantum logics with those three conditionals, each of which defines different quantum logical truth value assignment. We show that those three models satisfy the transfer principle of the same form to determine the quantum logical truth values of theorems of the ZFC set theory. We also show that the reals in the model and the truth values of their equality are the same for those models. Interestingly, however, the order relation between quantum reals significantly depends on the underlying conditionals. We characterize the operational meanings of those order relations in terms of joint probability obtained by the successive projective measurements of arbitrary two observables. Those characterizations clearly show their individual features and will play a fundamental role in future applications to quantum physics.