Based on the axioms of quantum theory, we identify a class of topological singularities that encode a fundamental difference between classic and quantum probability, and explain quantum theory’s puzzles and phenomena in simple mathematical terms so they are no longer ‘quantum paradoxes’. The singularities provide also new experimental insights and predictions that are presented in this article and establish a surprising new connection between the physical and social sciences. The key is the topology of spaces of quantum events and of the frameworks postulated by these axioms. These are quite different from their counterparts in classic probability and explain mathematically the interference between quantum experiments and the existence of several frameworks or ‘violation of unicity’ that characterizes quantum physics. They also explain entanglement, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, order dependence of observations, the conjunction fallacy and geometric phenomena such as Pancharatnam–Berry phases. Somewhat surprisingly, we find that the same topological singularities explain the impossibility of selecting a social preference among different individual preferences: which is Arrow’s social choice paradox: the foundations of social choice and of quantum theory are therefore mathematically equivalent. We identify necessary and sufficient conditions on how to restrict experiments to avoid these singularities and recover unicity, avoiding possible interference between experiments and also quantum paradoxes; the same topological restriction is shown to provide a resolution to the social choice impossibility theorem of Chichilnisky.
Based on the axioms of quantum theory, we identify a class of topological singularities that encode a fundamental difference between classic and quantum probability, and explain quantum theory’s puzzles and phenomena in simple mathematical terms so they are no longer ‘quantum paradoxes’. The singularities provide also new experimental insights and predictions that are presented in this article and establish a surprising new connection between the physical and social sciences. The key is the topology of spaces of quantum events and of the frameworks postulated by these axioms. These are quite different from their counterparts in classic probability and explain mathematically the interference between quantum experiments and the existence of several frameworks or ‘violation of unicity’ that characterizes quantum physics. They also explain entanglement, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, order dependence of observations, the conjunction fallacy and geometric phenomena such as Pancharatnam–Berry phases. Somewhat surprisingly, we find that the same topological singularities explain the impossibility of selecting a social preference among different individual preferences: which is Arrow’s social choice paradox: the foundations of social choice and of quantum theory are therefore mathematically equivalent. We identify necessary and sufficient conditions on how to restrict experiments to avoid these singularities and recover unicity, avoiding possible interference between experiments and also quantum paradoxes; the same topological restriction is shown to provide a resolution to the social choice impossibility theorem of Chichilnisky.
Quantum probability theory, originally developed in the context of quantum mechanics, has increasingly been applied to social sciences to explain decision-making, cognition, and collective behavior. Unlike classical probability models, which assume pre-existing and well-defined preferences, quantum models incorporate superposition, interference, and non-commutativity to capture the contextual dependence and measurement effects observed in human decisions. This paper systematically explores the theoretical foundations of quantum probability in social sciences, discusses model construction techniques, and reviews empirical findings supporting its application. By examining case studies in quantum cognition, quantum game theory, and quantum voting, we illustrate how quantum approaches provide alternative explanations for phenomena such as order effects, measurement-induced attitude shifts, and collective polarization. The paper also discusses the methodological challenges and limitations of quantum social science, emphasizing the need for rigorous experimental validation and interdisciplinary collaboration. Finally, we highlight the potential for integrating quantum probability models with emerging technologies such as quantum computing and artificial intelligence, opening new avenues for social science research and policy applications.
The standard Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics relies on a set of historically established, ad hoc postulates to describe particle-wave duality, measurement, and non-locality. In this paper, we propose a single foundational axiom that fully reproduces the standard mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics while eliminating the need for supplementary assumptions. From this singular postulate, we rigorously derive the fundamental origin of the wave function and the mathematical generator of the Schrödinger equation. Furthermore, we demonstrate via isomorfism that all seemingly inexplicable quantum phenomena—including wave-function collapse and quantum entanglement—are mathematically and conceptually reducible to the underlying dynamics of the double-slit experiment. By establishing a direct fundamental correlation between the double-slit interference mechanism and the Monty Hall phenomenon, we prove that these effects are distinct manifestations of the exact same principle. We framed the double-slit experiment as an interference of the space of possibilities affected by information and simetrys. Ultimately, by anchoring the existing quantum mathematical framework to this unique axiom, this work provides a coherent, paradox-free ontological foundation that resolves the interpretational crisis of quantum mechanics without altering its empirical predictive power.
One of the most complex systems is the human brain whose formalized functioning is characterized by decision theory. We present a "Quantum Decision Theory" of decision-making, based on the mathematical theory of separable Hilbert spaces. This mathematical structure captures the effect of superposition of composite prospects, including many incorporated intentions, which allows us to explain a variety of interesting fallacies and anomalies that have been reported to particularize the decision-making of real human beings. The theory describes entangled decision-making, non-commutativity of subsequent decisions, and intention interference of composite prospects. We demonstrate how the violation of the Savage's sure-thing principle (disjunction effect) can be explained as a result of the interference of intentions, when making decisions under uncertainty. The conjunction fallacy is also explained by the presence of the interference terms. We demonstrate that all known anomalies and paradoxes, documented in the context of classical decision theory, are reducible to just a few mathematical archetypes, all of which allow the finding of straightforward explanations in the frame of the developed quantum approach.
Abstract This work develops a unified mathematical framework in which the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics arise naturally from the operator–topological structure of χ‑substance within the ZEBTS theory. The uncertainty principle, complementarity, the Pauli exclusion principle, entanglement, decoherence, and quantum measurement are reformulated in terms of χ‑operators, χ‑entropy, and topological transitions T^χ. Quantum dynamics is derived from the evolution of χ‑substance under the action of the fundamental operator D̂, with the Schrödinger and von Neumann equations appearing as projections of the general χ‑evolution equation. The theory introduces flightron dynamics, a new class of resonance phenomena capable of modifying coherence, entanglement, and conservation laws. Conservation principles and gauge symmetries are generalized to χ‑gauge transformations and topological invariants such as Chern numbers and Hopf indices. The resulting framework provides a coherent interpretation of quantum phenomena, resolves conceptual paradoxes such as nonlocality and wave‑function collapse, and predicts new effects including χ‑oscillations, flightron‑induced anomalies, and topological quantum transitions. Experimental strategies are proposed across ultracold atoms, quantum optics, condensed matter, high‑energy physics, and cosmology. ZEBTS thus offers a unified topological–operator foundation for quantum physics and opens a path toward a new synthesis of matter, geometry, and information.
Since the 70’s, researchers noticed that people do not follow the rules of probability theory while making decisions under risk.Just like quantum physics was created in order to accommodate paradoxical findings from classical physics, quantum cognition arose as a disciple with the promise of creating models that would accommodate and explain the violations found in human decision-making.In this work, we explore an alternative quantum structure to perform quantum probabilistic inferences. We propose a Quantum Probabilistic Graphical Model in order to predict human decisions under situations with high levels of uncertainty.Under the proposed network, if a node (event) is unobserved, then a particle can enter in a superposition state and produce interference effects. These effects provide some explanation in terms of cognition, since they can be seen as the feeling of confusion or ambiguity.This work also discusses the problem of creating a generalized quantum probabilistic model: the number of quantum parameters grows exponentially. We will see that for a given event, several outcomes are possible through quantum probability. A final question is posed and discussed: is it possible to find a method to assign quantum parameters in order to provide accurate predictions?