Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Research outreach

How geometry expresses the Second Law of Thermodynamics

Published Jun 13, 2022• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

oth quantum mechanics and thermodynamics are central concepts in modern physics.Yet while quantum mechanics is widely believed to be the fundamental description of how the universe works, the goal of deriving thermodynamics from quantum principles has eluded physicists for many decades.A central part of this challenge lies in the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which guarantees that no physical process where energy is converted from one form to another can ever be 100% efficient.The process must generate 'waste heat' in some form, and the 'entropy' of the universe as a whole must increase.

DOI
10.32907/ro-130-2785565102

Related papers

First and Second Law of Quantum Thermodynamics: A Consistent Derivation Based on a Microscopic Definition of Entropy

Philipp Strasberg, Andreas Winter

Deriving the laws of thermodynamics from a microscopic picture is a central quest of statistical mechanics.This tutorial focuses on the derivation of the first and second law for isolated and open quantum systems far from equilibrium, where such foundational questions also become practically relevant for emergent nanotechnologies.The derivation is based on a microscopic definition of five essential quantities: internal energy, thermodynamic entropy, work, heat, and temperature.These definitions are shown to satisfy the phenomenological laws of nonequilibrium thermodynamics for a large class of states and processes.The consistency with previous results is demonstrated.The framework applies to multiple baths including particle transport and accounts for processes with, e.g., a changing temperature of the bath, which is determined microscopically.An integral fluctuation theorem for entropy production is satisfied.In summary, this tutorial introduces a consistent and versatile framework to understand and apply the laws of thermodynamics in the quantum regime and beyond.

arXiv:2002.08817•PRX Quantum•Aug 19, 2021•129 citations

The Statistical Interpretation of Entropy

David R. Gaskell

In Chapter 3 the introduction of entropy as a state function was facilitated by the realization that there exist possible and impossible processes, and by an examination of the heat and work effects occurring during these processes. From the formal statement of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as developed from Classical Thermodynamics arguments, it is difficult to assign a physical significance or a physical quality to entropy. In this respect entropy differs from internal energy in spite of the fact that, within the scope of Classical Thermodynamics, both properties are simply mathematical functions of the state of a system. The ready acceptance of the First Law of Thermodynamics, after its enunciation, was due to the easily understood physical significance of internal energy, whereas the lack of corresponding understanding of entropy caused the acceptance of the Second Law of Thermodynamics to be slow. From the classical viewpoint the Second Law is only valid as a direct result of the fact that, to date, human ingenuity has failed to invent a perpetual motion machine. Thus, within the scope of Classical Thermodynamics, the Second Law is a “law” only because it has not yet been disproved. The physical interpretation of entropy had to await the development of quantum theory and statistical mechanics.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 13, 2012•1 citation

The kinetic basis of thermodynamics

Max Born, H. S. Green

Abstract In this paper the thermodynamical properties of any system whatsoever are deduced from quantum mechanics. Two fundamental irreversible processes are considered: the conversion of other forms of energy into heat, and the flow of heat from one temperature to another. By the proof of a generalized H -theorem, it is shown that in each case the entropy, correctly defined, must increase, and the system tend towards a state of equilibrium. A simple but rigorous proof of Boltzmann’s law is given from which the thermodynamics of reversible processes may be inferred. An appendix includes the exact solution of the most general time-dependent perturbation problem of quantum mechanics.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Feb 4, 1948•13 citations

A review of quantum thermodynamics

S. Shahidani, A. T. Rezakhani

In this article, we present a brief and elementary review of quantum thermodynamics and its achievements and challenges. This review includes an introduction to some fundamental concepts such as internal energy, heat, work, entropy, entropy production, thermal equilibrium, second law of quantum thermodynamics, relation between thermodynamics and information theory, as well as a discussion of how quantum effects such as entanglement and correlations affect performance of quantum heat engines.

Iranian Journal of Physics Research•Dec 10, 2019•0 citations

A review of quantum thermodynamics

S. Shahidani, A. T. Rezakhani

In this article, we present a brief and elementary review of quantum thermodynamics and its achievements and challenges. This review includes an introduction to some fundamental concepts such as internal energy, heat, work, entropy, entropy production, thermal equilibrium, second law of quantum thermodynamics, relation between thermodynamics and information theory, as well as a discussion of how quantum effects such as entanglement and correlations affect performance of quantum heat engines.

Iranian Journal of Physics Research•Oct 1, 2019•0 citations

ћ, or, Quantum Theory

Tristan Hübsch, Djordje Minić

Every vertex of the magic cube of physics discussed so far introduced a major element in the development of physics and the whole of science. Mechanics introduced the basic concept of equations of motion, or time-evolution of a physical system given certain initial condition and the associated idea of determinism, even with its generalization in the form of chaos, the dependence of the outcomes of the temporal evolution on the initial conditions. These concepts taken for many particles, or elements of a physical system, led to the probabilistic description of many particle systems, in the realm of statistical physics and thermodynamics, whereby the averages over time of various observable quantities were related to the ensemble averages, that involve classical, so-called Kolmogorov, probability measures, at least for certain “equilibrium” situations. The second law of thermodynamics introduced the concept of entropy and its probabilistic increase, the first truly emergent, probabilistic law in physics (temperature and pressure, being other emergent quantities, apart from entropy, the measure of disorder of a statistical system). In the context of Newtonian gravity, one gets, at least in retrospect the geometric description of gravity in non-relativistic, Galilean spacetime. Galilean relativity, based on the asymmetric mixing of space and time, with the absolute, universal time, true for all observers, gets generalized in special theory of relativity to observer dependent space and observer dependent time, viewed as “slices” of a new concept of spacetime, with the new concept of causal structure, that distinguish timelike, null and spacelike events. This in turn is made into a full dynamical geometric structure of spacetime with a relativistic description of gravity stemming from curvature of spacetime, and a dynamical causal structure, tied to gravity. In our next story, the story of quantum theory, we will encounter fundamental, intrinsic probabilities, that can interfere, unlike the classical probabilities of statistical thermodynamics, and which are consistent with equations of motion of individual elements, and not, as in statistical thermodynamics, with temporal averages over the time evolution of many elements. This is the big new lesson of quantum theory, that transcends the lessons of classical spacetime physics.

CRC Press eBooks•Jun 4, 2026•0 citations
oth quantum mechanics and thermodynamics are central concepts in modern physics.Yet while quantum mechanics is widely believed to be the fundamental description of how the universe works, the goal of deriving thermodynamics from quantum principles has eluded physicists for many decades.A central part of this challenge lies in the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which guarantees that no physical process where energy is converted from one form to another can ever be 100% efficient.The process must generate 'waste heat' in some form, and the 'entropy' of the universe as a whole must increase.
Deriving the laws of thermodynamics from a microscopic picture is a central quest of statistical mechanics.This tutorial focuses on the derivation of the first and second law for isolated and open quantum systems far from equilibrium, where such foundational questions also become practically relevant for emergent nanotechnologies.The derivation is based on a microscopic definition of five essential quantities: internal energy, thermodynamic entropy, work, heat, and temperature.These definitions are shown to satisfy the phenomenological laws of nonequilibrium thermodynamics for a large class of states and processes.The consistency with previous results is demonstrated.The framework applies to multiple baths including particle transport and accounts for processes with, e.g., a changing temperature of the bath, which is determined microscopically.An integral fluctuation theorem for entropy production is satisfied.In summary, this tutorial introduces a consistent and versatile framework to understand and apply the laws of thermodynamics in the quantum regime and beyond.
In Chapter 3 the introduction of entropy as a state function was facilitated by the realization that there exist possible and impossible processes, and by an examination of the heat and work effects occurring during these processes. From the formal statement of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as developed from Classical Thermodynamics arguments, it is difficult to assign a physical significance or a physical quality to entropy. In this respect entropy differs from internal energy in spite of the fact that, within the scope of Classical Thermodynamics, both properties are simply mathematical functions of the state of a system. The ready acceptance of the First Law of Thermodynamics, after its enunciation, was due to the easily understood physical significance of internal energy, whereas the lack of corresponding understanding of entropy caused the acceptance of the Second Law of Thermodynamics to be slow. From the classical viewpoint the Second Law is only valid as a direct result of the fact that, to date, human ingenuity has failed to invent a perpetual motion machine. Thus, within the scope of Classical Thermodynamics, the Second Law is a “law” only because it has not yet been disproved. The physical interpretation of entropy had to await the development of quantum theory and statistical mechanics.
Abstract In this paper the thermodynamical properties of any system whatsoever are deduced from quantum mechanics. Two fundamental irreversible processes are considered: the conversion of other forms of energy into heat, and the flow of heat from one temperature to another. By the proof of a generalized H -theorem, it is shown that in each case the entropy, correctly defined, must increase, and the system tend towards a state of equilibrium. A simple but rigorous proof of Boltzmann’s law is given from which the thermodynamics of reversible processes may be inferred. An appendix includes the exact solution of the most general time-dependent perturbation problem of quantum mechanics.
Every vertex of the magic cube of physics discussed so far introduced a major element in the development of physics and the whole of science. Mechanics introduced the basic concept of equations of motion, or time-evolution of a physical system given certain initial condition and the associated idea of determinism, even with its generalization in the form of chaos, the dependence of the outcomes of the temporal evolution on the initial conditions. These concepts taken for many particles, or elements of a physical system, led to the probabilistic description of many particle systems, in the realm of statistical physics and thermodynamics, whereby the averages over time of various observable quantities were related to the ensemble averages, that involve classical, so-called Kolmogorov, probability measures, at least for certain “equilibrium” situations. The second law of thermodynamics introduced the concept of entropy and its probabilistic increase, the first truly emergent, probabilistic law in physics (temperature and pressure, being other emergent quantities, apart from entropy, the measure of disorder of a statistical system). In the context of Newtonian gravity, one gets, at least in retrospect the geometric description of gravity in non-relativistic, Galilean spacetime. Galilean relativity, based on the asymmetric mixing of space and time, with the absolute, universal time, true for all observers, gets generalized in special theory of relativity to observer dependent space and observer dependent time, viewed as “slices” of a new concept of spacetime, with the new concept of causal structure, that distinguish timelike, null and spacelike events. This in turn is made into a full dynamical geometric structure of spacetime with a relativistic description of gravity stemming from curvature of spacetime, and a dynamical causal structure, tied to gravity. In our next story, the story of quantum theory, we will encounter fundamental, intrinsic probabilities, that can interfere, unlike the classical probabilities of statistical thermodynamics, and which are consistent with equations of motion of individual elements, and not, as in statistical thermodynamics, with temporal averages over the time evolution of many elements. This is the big new lesson of quantum theory, that transcends the lessons of classical spacetime physics.