What is a quantum phase transition? Consider a Hamiltonian, H ( g ), whose degrees of freedom reside on the sites of a lattice, and which varies as a function of a dimensionless coupling, g . Let us follow the evolution of the ground state energy of H ( g ) as a function of g . For the case of a finite lattice, this ground state energy will generically be a smooth, analytic function of g . The main possibility of an exception comes from the case when g couples only to a conserved quantity (i.e. H ( g ) = H 0 + gH 1 , where H 0 and H 1 commute). This means that H 0 and H 1 can be simultaneously diagonalized and so the eigenfunctions are independent of g even though the eigenvalues vary with g ; then there can be a level-crossing where an excited level becomes the ground state at g = gc (say), creating a point of nonanalyticity of the ground state energy as a function of g (see Fig. 1.1). The possibilities for an infinite lattice are richer. An avoided level-crossing between the ground and an excited state in a finite lattice could become progressively sharper as the lattice size increases, leading to a nonanalyticity at g = gc in the infinite lattice limit. We shall identify any point of nonanalyticity in the ground state energy of the infinite lattice system as a quantum phase transition: The nonanalyticity could be either the limiting case of an avoided level-crossing or an actual level-crossing.
What is a quantum phase transition? Consider a Hamiltonian, H ( g ), whose degrees of freedom reside on the sites of a lattice, and which varies as a function of a dimensionless coupling, g . Let us follow the evolution of the ground state energy of H ( g ) as a function of g . For the case of a finite lattice, this ground state energy will generically be a smooth, analytic function of g . The main possibility of an exception comes from the case when g couples only to a conserved quantity (i.e. H ( g ) = H 0 + gH 1 , where H 0 and H 1 commute). This means that H 0 and H 1 can be simultaneously diagonalized and so the eigenfunctions are independent of g even though the eigenvalues vary with g ; then there can be a level-crossing where an excited level becomes the ground state at g = gc (say), creating a point of nonanalyticity of the ground state energy as a function of g (see Fig. 1.1). The possibilities for an infinite lattice are richer. An avoided level-crossing between the ground and an excited state in a finite lattice could become progressively sharper as the lattice size increases, leading to a nonanalyticity at g = gc in the infinite lattice limit. We shall identify any point of nonanalyticity in the ground state energy of the infinite lattice system as a quantum phase transition: The nonanalyticity could be either the limiting case of an avoided level-crossing or an actual level-crossing.
What Is a Quantum Phase Transition? Consider a Hamiltonian, H(g) , whose degrees of freedom reside on the sites of a lattice, and which varies as a function of a dimensionless coupling g . Let us follow the evolution of the ground state energy of H(g) as a function of g . For the case of a finite lattice, this ground state energy will generically be a smooth, analytic function of g . The main possibility of an exception comes from the case when g couples only to a conserved quantity (i.e., H(g) = H 0 + gH 1 , where H 0 and H 1 commute). This means that H 0 and H 1 can be simultaneously diagonalized and so the eigenfunctions are independent of g even though the eigenvalues vary with g ; then there can be a level-crossing where an excited level becomes the ground state at g = g c (say), creating a point of nonanalyticity of the ground state energy as a function of g (see Fig. 1.1). The possibilities for an infinite lattice are richer. An avoided level-crossing between the ground and an excited state in a finite lattice could become progressively sharper as the lattice size increases, leading to a nonanalyticity at g = g c in the infinite lattice limit. We shall identify any point of nonanalyticity in the ground state energy of the infinite lattice system as a quantum phase transition: The nonanalyticity could be either the limiting case of an avoided level-crossing or an actual level-crossing.
Introduction In the limit of zero temperature, the partition function is dominated by the ground state of the system, the free energy becomes equivalent to the ground state energy, and the central object of interest is the Hamiltonian of the system H (λ), dependent in general on one or more parameters λ. A ‘quantum’ Hamiltonian, as noted previously, is one which contains non-commuting operators. Here we concentrate on quantum spin Hamiltonians, of which the prime example is the Heisenberg model. Of particular interest is the possibility of a quantum phase transition , i.e. nonanalytic behaviour as a function of coupling λ. A quantum phase transition may exert a dominating influence on the system over a range of low temperatures above T = 0. Such phenomena have figured prominently in theoretical discussions of experiments on the cuprate superconductors, the heavy fermion materials, organic conductors, and related materials (e.g. Sachdev, 1999). In some cases, a correspondence can be found between a quantum system at zero temperature in 1 time and ( d – 1) space dimensions, and an equivalent classical system at finite temperature in d space dimensions, based on the Feynman path integral formalism – see Chapter 9 and Appendix 8 for further discussions. Under this mapping, the temperature kT in the classical system corresponds to a coupling λ in the equivalent quantum system. If a phase transition occurs, the same universal critical exponents are expected to apply in both cases.
Quantum phase transitions are sudden changes in the ground-state wavefunction of a many-body system that can occur as a control parameter such as a concentration or a field strength is varied. They are driven purely by the competition between quantum fluctuations and mutual interactions among constituents of the system, not by thermal fluctuations; hence they can occur even at zero temperature. Examples of quantum phase transitions in many-body physics may be found in systems ranging from high-temperature superconductors to topological insulators. A quantum phase transition usually can be characterized by nonanalyticity/discontinuity in certain order parameters or divergence of the ground state energy eigenvalue and/or its derivatives with respect to certain physical quantities. Here in a circular one-dimensional spin model with Heisenberg XY interaction and no magnetic field, we observe critical phenomena for the n0=1/N→0 Mott insulator caused by a qualitative change of the boundary condition. We demonstrate in the vicinity of the transition point a sudden change in ground-state properties accompanied by an avoided level-crossing between the ground and the first excited states. Notably, our result links conventional quantum phase transitions to microscopic boundary conditions, with significant implications for quantum information, quantum control, and quantum computing.
Quantum phase transitions, being in charge of the property of matter, are normally induced by varying the Hamiltonian and are characterized by an avoided level crossing between the ground and an excited state. Recently, a quantum phase anomaly induced by a boundary is predicted theoretically as the number of sites N goes to infinity in a one-dimensional Heisenberg spin XY model without an external magnetic field. The infinite-size lattice apparently is inaccessible in experiment, which prevents the experimental observation of the theoretical prediction. In this paper, we find that the finite-size odd-sited lattice can also give the infinite-size lattice's ground-state behavior, and successfully observe such a critical anomaly between two phases having topologically different boundary conditions for the Mott insulator in a finite-size photonic lattice.
Aim and Scope of this Book A plethora of systems exhibit phase transitions as the temperature or some other parameter is changed. Examples range from the ice-water phase transition observed in our daily life to the loss of ferromagnetism in iron or to the more sophisticated Mott insulator-superfluid phase transition observed in optical lattices [343]. The last five decades have witnessed a tremendous upsurge in the studies of phase transitions at finite temperature [727, 149, 333, 136, 494, 541, 556]. The success of Landau-Ginzburg theories and the concepts of spontaneous symmetry breaking and the renormalization group [27, 410, 821, 578] in explaining many of the finite temperature phase transitions occurring in nature has been spectacular. In this book, we will consider only a subclass of phase transitions called quantum phase transitions (QPTs) [154, 658, 725, 799, 185, 63, 62, 66, 141, 744] and we will discuss these mainly from the view point of recent studies of information and dynamics. QPTs are zero temperature phase transitions which are driven by quantum fluctuations and are usually associated with a non-analyticity in the ground state energy density of a quantum many-body Hamiltonian. We will focus on continuous QPTs where the order parameter vanishes continuously at the quantum critical point (QCP) at some value of the parameters which characterize the Hamiltonian. We will not discuss first order quantum phase transitions associated with an abrupt change in the order parameter. Usually, a first order phase transition is characterized by a finite discontinuity in the first derivative of the ground state energy density. A continuous QPT is similarly characterized by a finite discontinuity, or divergence, in the second derivative of the ground state energy density, assuming that the first derivative is continuous. This is of course the classical definition; we will later mention some QPTs where the ground state energy density is not necessarily singular.
The polaron concept captures physical situations involving an itinerant quantum particle (excitation) that interacts strongly with bosonic degrees of freedom and becomes heavily boson-dressed. While the Gerlach-L\"owen theorem rules out the occurrence of nonanalyticities of ground-state-related quantities for a broad class of polaron models, examples were found in recent years of sharp transitions pertaining to strongly momentum-dependent interactions of an excitation with dispersionless (zero-dimensional) phonons. On the example of a lattice model with Peierls-type excitation-phonon interaction, such level-crossing-type small-polaron transitions are analyzed here through the prism of the entanglement spectrum of the excitation-phonon system. By evaluating this spectrum in a numerically exact fashion it is demonstrated that the behavior of the entanglement entropy in the vicinity of the critical excitation-phonon coupling strength chiefly originates from one specific entanglement-spectrum eigenvalue, namely the smallest one. While the discrete translational symmetry of the system implies that those eigenvalues can be labeled by the bare-excitation quasimomentum quantum numbers, here it is shown numerically that they are predominantly associated with the quasimomenta 0 and $\ensuremath{\pi}$, including cases where a transition between the two takes place deeply in the strong-coupling regime.