Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

Classical Aspects of Spontaneous Emission

ALBERT ROSE

Published Apr 1, 1989• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814434188_0007

Related papers

On the classical and quantum feature of self amplified spontaneous emission

Rodolfo Bonifacio

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 1997•2 citations

Theoretical Aspects of Spontaneous Photon-Emission from Atoms.

Peter W. Milonni

•Jan 1, 1974•0 citations

Maser Noise Considerations

J. Weber

The contribution of the saturation field to the noise figure of a three-level maser is calculated. It is shown that the effect is very small, under ordinary circumstances.Certain aspects of spontaneous-emission noise are considered. It is shown that the spontaneous-emission equivalent temperature for a free-electron vacuum-tube amplifier is one-half that of a maser.The possibility of eliminating spontaneous-emission noise is considered and it is concluded that more general quantum-mechanical amplifiers can in principle be constructed which will not have spontaneous-emission noise.

Physical Review•Nov 1, 1957•40 citations

Spontaneous Emission and Its Effects

L. F. Mollenauer, J. P. Gordon

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Phase aspect in stimulated and spontaneous emission and the laser linewidth

Markus Pollnau

In the literature one finds several conflicting accounts of the phase difference of stimulated and spontaneous emission, as well as absorption, with respect to an existing (triggering) electromagnetic field. One of these approaches proposes that stimulated emission and absorption occur in phase and out of phase with their driving field, respectively, whereas spontaneous emission occurs under an arbitrary phase difference with respect to an existing field. It has served as a basis for explaining quantum-mechanically the laser linewidth, its narrowing by a factor of 2 around the laser threshold, as well as its broadening due to amplitude-phase coupling, resulting in Henry’s α-factor. Assuming the validity of Maxwell’s equations, all three processes would, thus, violate the law of energy conservation. In semi-classical approaches, we investigate stimulated emission in a Fabry-Pérot resonator, analyze the Lorentz oscillator model, apply the Kramers-Kronig relations to the complex susceptibility, understand the summation of quantized electric fields, and quantitatively interpret emission and absorption in the amplitude-phase diagram. In all cases, we derive that the phase of stimulated emission is 90o in lead of the driving field, and the phase of absorption lags 90o behind the transmitted field. Also spontaneous emission must obey energy conservation, hence it occurs with 90o phase in lead of an existing field. These semi-classical findings agree with recent experimental investigations regarding the interaction of attosecond pulses with an atom, thereby questioning the physical explanation of the laser linewidth and its narrowing or broadening.

SPIE Solid State Lasers: Technology and Devices•Mar 7, 2019•0 citations

On spontaneous emission

George William Series

European Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 1990•0 citations
The contribution of the saturation field to the noise figure of a three-level maser is calculated. It is shown that the effect is very small, under ordinary circumstances.Certain aspects of spontaneous-emission noise are considered. It is shown that the spontaneous-emission equivalent temperature for a free-electron vacuum-tube amplifier is one-half that of a maser.The possibility of eliminating spontaneous-emission noise is considered and it is concluded that more general quantum-mechanical amplifiers can in principle be constructed which will not have spontaneous-emission noise.
In the literature one finds several conflicting accounts of the phase difference of stimulated and spontaneous emission, as well as absorption, with respect to an existing (triggering) electromagnetic field. One of these approaches proposes that stimulated emission and absorption occur in phase and out of phase with their driving field, respectively, whereas spontaneous emission occurs under an arbitrary phase difference with respect to an existing field. It has served as a basis for explaining quantum-mechanically the laser linewidth, its narrowing by a factor of 2 around the laser threshold, as well as its broadening due to amplitude-phase coupling, resulting in Henry’s α-factor. Assuming the validity of Maxwell’s equations, all three processes would, thus, violate the law of energy conservation. In semi-classical approaches, we investigate stimulated emission in a Fabry-Pérot resonator, analyze the Lorentz oscillator model, apply the Kramers-Kronig relations to the complex susceptibility, understand the summation of quantized electric fields, and quantitatively interpret emission and absorption in the amplitude-phase diagram. In all cases, we derive that the phase of stimulated emission is 90o in lead of the driving field, and the phase of absorption lags 90o behind the transmitted field. Also spontaneous emission must obey energy conservation, hence it occurs with 90o phase in lead of an existing field. These semi-classical findings agree with recent experimental investigations regarding the interaction of attosecond pulses with an atom, thereby questioning the physical explanation of the laser linewidth and its narrowing or broadening.