Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Why spontaneous emission?

Peter W. Milonni

Published Apr 1, 1984• 99 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper is a discussion of that perennial question, ‘‘Why does an excited atom radiate?’’ A satisfactory physical picture emerges when proper account is taken of the interplay between radiation reaction and the (quantum-mechanical) zero-point fluctuations of the radiation field. The fluctuation-dissipation connection between these two effects is therefore emphasized.

DOI
10.1119/1.13886

Related papers

Spontaneous emission

P. van der Straten, Harold J. Metcalf

Introduction The preceding chapters have focused on atomic transitions induced by applied radiation. That is, there is an optical field illuminating the atoms, and their response is calculated. It is implicitly assumed that an excited atom left alone will spontaneously return to the ground state, and conserve energy by emitting light that satisfies E 2 − E 1 = ħ ω 21 in accordance with the Planck and Bohr pictures. But this spontaneous emission process is not addressed quantitatively in these earlier chapters. Spontaneous emission is one of the most pervasive phenomena of atomic physics, and yet its origins remain among the least well-understood. The number of misconceptions is enormous, and they are to be found in textbooks, journal articles, and lecture notes. Because the natural decay of an excited atom adds energy to what is usually an empty mode of the electromagnetic field, the process is fundamentally quantum mechanical. Classical or even semi-classical descriptions cannot be assured to give correct answers. This is not to say that such discussion is to be avoided, but only that caution is needed in interpreting the results. Toward the end of the nineteenth century, many experimental results made it clear that classical mechanics needed to be supplemented by new theories. The first venture into the new physics was Planck's hypothesis that the energy of classical radiating oscillators like those discussed in Chap. 1 would have to be quantized into integer multiples of ħ ω. This notion led to his famous formula for the spectrum of thermal radiation from a non-reflective object (black body), and this formula describes a radiation field in thermodynamic equilibrium with its environment. The result of Planck's hypothesis in the context of thermal equilibrium plays a vital role in the discussion of spontaneous emission. Einstein A - and B -coefficients Soon after Bohr proposed a model of atomic structure consisting of discrete energy levels, connected by radiation whose energy satisfied Δ E = ħω when atoms made transition between them, Einstein published the first serious attempt to connect the absorption and emission processes. Absorption, he reasoned, could occur only in the presence of applied radiation, whereas spontaneous decay occurred without the application of any field.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 2015•0 citations

Radiation reaction and vacuum fluctuations in spontaneous emission

Peter W. Milonni, Wallace Arden Smith

A Heisenberg-picture treatment of spontaneous emission is given, and the origin of radiative line shifts and widths is discussed. It is shown that radiation reaction and vacuum fluctuations provide complementary conceptual bases for the interpretation of these radiative corrections. Alternative approaches are discussed, including the use of a random classical field to simulate the effects of the quantum-electrodynamical radiation field.

Physical Review A•Mar 1, 1975•124 citations

Spontaneous emission: vacuum fluctuations or radiation reaction?

Ravinder Rupchand Puri

The role of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction in the process of spontaneous emission is examined with particular reference to the Heisenberg picture of quantum electrodynamics. In this picture the radiation reaction is found to be responsible for spontaneous emission if the equations are ordered normally. However, in the case of nonnormally ordered equations there appears to be an explicit contribution to the observable effects from vacuum fluctuations as well. We point out that this contribution from the vacuum field is an artifact of the approximation methods employed for eliminating the free-field variables from the nonnormally ordered equations These approximations are the same as those used in the master-equation approach, in which spontaneous emission appears to be due solely to the vacuum fluctuations. We show that the vacuum field does not contribute explicitly in any ordering if it is eliminated nonperturbatively and the approximation methods are invoked only after its elimination from the equations of motion.

Journal of the Optical Society of America B•Mar 1, 1985•3 citations

Comment on “Spontaneous emission: vacuum fluctuations or radiation reaction” by R R Puri

Peter W. Milonni

It has recently been claimed that the vacuum field does not contribute explicitly, in any operator ordering, to spontaneous emission. This claim is based on a trivial observation that misses the point of a whole series of independent investigations.

Journal of the Optical Society of America B•Dec 1, 1985•2 citations

Fluctuations in Radiative Processes

Claude N. Cohen-Tannoudji

The purpose of these two lectures is to present a brief review of theoretical works done at Ecole Normale Superieure in collaboration with Jean Dalibard, Jacques Dupont-Roc and Claude Fabre. The motivation of these works is to try to understand the dynamics of an atomic system coupled to the radiation field and to get some physical insight in radiative processes in terms of fluctuations of the two interacting systems. By radiative processes, we mean spontaneous emission of radiation by an excited atom and radiative corrections such as the Lamb-shift or g − 2. We will focus here on "spontaneous" effects which are not induced by an incident field, so that the two interacting systems are the atom and the vacuum field.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1986•23 citations

Interaction Hamiltonian and Spontaneous Emission

Peter W. Milonni

Abstract The atom-field interaction is formulated within the fully quantized-field theory, starting from a detailed analysis of the transformation from the fundamental minimal coupling interaction Hamiltonian to the electric dipole Hamiltonian used extensively in quantum optics. Spontaneous emission, radiative level shifts, and the natural radiative lineshape are treated in both the Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures, with emphasis on the roles of vacuum field fluctuations, radiation reaction, and the fluctuation-dissipation relation between them. The shortcomings of semiclassical radiation theories are discussed.

•Jan 31, 2019•0 citations
This paper is a discussion of that perennial question, ‘‘Why does an excited atom radiate?’’ A satisfactory physical picture emerges when proper account is taken of the interplay between radiation reaction and the (quantum-mechanical) zero-point fluctuations of the radiation field. The fluctuation-dissipation connection between these two effects is therefore emphasized.
Introduction The preceding chapters have focused on atomic transitions induced by applied radiation. That is, there is an optical field illuminating the atoms, and their response is calculated. It is implicitly assumed that an excited atom left alone will spontaneously return to the ground state, and conserve energy by emitting light that satisfies E 2 − E 1 = ħ ω 21 in accordance with the Planck and Bohr pictures. But this spontaneous emission process is not addressed quantitatively in these earlier chapters. Spontaneous emission is one of the most pervasive phenomena of atomic physics, and yet its origins remain among the least well-understood. The number of misconceptions is enormous, and they are to be found in textbooks, journal articles, and lecture notes. Because the natural decay of an excited atom adds energy to what is usually an empty mode of the electromagnetic field, the process is fundamentally quantum mechanical. Classical or even semi-classical descriptions cannot be assured to give correct answers. This is not to say that such discussion is to be avoided, but only that caution is needed in interpreting the results. Toward the end of the nineteenth century, many experimental results made it clear that classical mechanics needed to be supplemented by new theories. The first venture into the new physics was Planck's hypothesis that the energy of classical radiating oscillators like those discussed in Chap. 1 would have to be quantized into integer multiples of ħ ω. This notion led to his famous formula for the spectrum of thermal radiation from a non-reflective object (black body), and this formula describes a radiation field in thermodynamic equilibrium with its environment. The result of Planck's hypothesis in the context of thermal equilibrium plays a vital role in the discussion of spontaneous emission. Einstein A - and B -coefficients Soon after Bohr proposed a model of atomic structure consisting of discrete energy levels, connected by radiation whose energy satisfied Δ E = ħω when atoms made transition between them, Einstein published the first serious attempt to connect the absorption and emission processes. Absorption, he reasoned, could occur only in the presence of applied radiation, whereas spontaneous decay occurred without the application of any field.
The role of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction in the process of spontaneous emission is examined with particular reference to the Heisenberg picture of quantum electrodynamics. In this picture the radiation reaction is found to be responsible for spontaneous emission if the equations are ordered normally. However, in the case of nonnormally ordered equations there appears to be an explicit contribution to the observable effects from vacuum fluctuations as well. We point out that this contribution from the vacuum field is an artifact of the approximation methods employed for eliminating the free-field variables from the nonnormally ordered equations These approximations are the same as those used in the master-equation approach, in which spontaneous emission appears to be due solely to the vacuum fluctuations. We show that the vacuum field does not contribute explicitly in any ordering if it is eliminated nonperturbatively and the approximation methods are invoked only after its elimination from the equations of motion.
The purpose of these two lectures is to present a brief review of theoretical works done at Ecole Normale Superieure in collaboration with Jean Dalibard, Jacques Dupont-Roc and Claude Fabre. The motivation of these works is to try to understand the dynamics of an atomic system coupled to the radiation field and to get some physical insight in radiative processes in terms of fluctuations of the two interacting systems. By radiative processes, we mean spontaneous emission of radiation by an excited atom and radiative corrections such as the Lamb-shift or g − 2. We will focus here on "spontaneous" effects which are not induced by an incident field, so that the two interacting systems are the atom and the vacuum field.
Abstract The atom-field interaction is formulated within the fully quantized-field theory, starting from a detailed analysis of the transformation from the fundamental minimal coupling interaction Hamiltonian to the electric dipole Hamiltonian used extensively in quantum optics. Spontaneous emission, radiative level shifts, and the natural radiative lineshape are treated in both the Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures, with emphasis on the roles of vacuum field fluctuations, radiation reaction, and the fluctuation-dissipation relation between them. The shortcomings of semiclassical radiation theories are discussed.