Discussion

Deepak Vaid, Sundance Bilson-Thompson

Lei Zhang, Wendie Han, Rui Zhang +2 more

Distributed online social network (DOSN) solves the challenges of single-point failure and user data privacy faced by traditional online social network (OSN). Online discussion group, allowing a user to facilitate the communications with other users, is one of the most important components of (D)OSN. Key management is the key technology to ensure the secure establishment of discussion groups in DOSNs. However, the existing key management schemes for secure discussion group establishment in DOSNs cannot meet the requirements of sender non-restriction, receiver controllability, round optimal, certificate freeness simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a novel key management scheme for secure discussion group establishment in DOSNs. In our scheme, any user could use our key management scheme to initialize a discussion group with a piece of discussion group information. Users who are interested in the group topic contained in the discussion group information can join and leave the discussion group at any time once the discussion group is initialized with one-round communication. Any user/sender can find the users that he/she wants to communicate with by looking up the discussion group information of a discussion group and then send encrypted messages to some or all of the users in the discussion group. Therefore, our scheme achieves sender non-restriction, receiver controllability, round optimal, certificate freeness simultaneously. Security analysis also shows that our scheme achieves confidentiality, authentication, full collusion resistance, known-key security and perfect forward security.

Erik Rüdinger

In recent years there has been an upsurge in the discussion of so-called delayed-choice experiments, as exemplified in the interferometer experiment discussed by Wheeler [1]. In commenting on this experiment Bohm et al. [2] claim that their quantum potential interpretation gives results entirely compatible with Bohr's views on wholeness and complementarity. It seems to me, however, that this discussion to a large extent completely misses the fundamental point in Bohr's argumentation as given in his famour answer [3] to Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen as well as in his paper on his discussions with Einstein [4]. Expressing it a bit paradoxically one might say that in the examples discussed the experiments are not sufficiently delayed. I shall therefore here discuss a different thought experiment, much closer to Bohr's own examples, which brings out this point.

Peter Shadbolt

David Wallace

After an initial discussion of the general aims of scientific theories, the quantum measurement problem is presented. Non-Everettian solutions to the problem are briefly discussed; the aim of the discussion is to show that these solutions require significant change either to our philosophical approach to science or to quantum theory itself. In this context, the Everett interpretation is introduced and motivated as the result of simply applying our normal approach to scientific theories to the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics and following where it leads. The chapter ends with a introductory discussion of potential problems, and with references to subsequent chapters where they are discussed more fully.