Often a pair of quantum systems may be represented mathematically (by a vector) in a way each system alone cannot: the mathematical representation of the pair is said to be non-separable: Schrödinger called this feature of quantum theory entanglement. It would reflect a physical relation between a pair of systems only if a system’s mathematical representation were to describe its physical condition. Einstein and colleagues used an entangled state to argue that its quantum state does not completely describe the physical condition of a system to which it is assigned. A single physical system may be assigned a non-separable quantum state, as may a large number of systems, including electrons, photons, and ions. The GHZ state is an example of an entangled polarization state that may be assigned to three photons.
Often a pair of quantum systems may be represented mathematically (by a vector) in a way each system alone cannot: the mathematical representation of the pair is said to be non-separable: Schrödinger called this feature of quantum theory entanglement. It would reflect a physical relation between a pair of systems only if a system’s mathematical representation were to describe its physical condition. Einstein and colleagues used an entangled state to argue that its quantum state does not completely describe the physical condition of a system to which it is assigned. A single physical system may be assigned a non-separable quantum state, as may a large number of systems, including electrons, photons, and ions. The GHZ state is an example of an entangled polarization state that may be assigned to three photons.
Up to now we have limited ourselves to states of a single particle. In the present chapter we shall introduce the description of two-particle states. Once this case is understood, it will be easy to generalize to any number of particles. States of two (or more) particles lead to very rich configurations called entangled states. A remarkable feature is that two entangled quantum particles, even at arbitrarily large spatial separations, continue to form a single entity and no classical probabilistic model is able to reproduce the correlation between particles. In the first section we shall present the essential mathematical formalism, that of the tensor product. This will permit us in Section 6.2 to describe quantum mixtures using the state operator formalism. Section 6.3 is devoted to the study of important physical consequences like the Bell inequalities and interference experiments involving entangled states, which will lead us to a deeper understanding of quantum physics. Finally, in the last section we shall briefly review applications to measurement theory and quantum information theory. The latter is undergoing rapid development at present and has applications to quantum computing, cryptography, and teleportation. The tensor product of two vector spaces Definition and properties of the tensor product We wish to construct the space of states of two physical systems which we assume initially to be completely independent. Let ℌ N 1 and ℌ M 2 be the spaces of states of the two systems, of dimension N and M , respectively.
In classical mechanics, two (or more) systems that do not interact – that do not exert any kind of force on each other – are completely separated (see Sec. 1.1), i.e. experiments performed locally on one of them cannot in any way influence experiments performed locally on the other. Quantum mechanics, on the other hand, admits that there can be a form of interdependence even in absence of physical interaction. This type of correlation goes under the name of entanglement (see Def. 5.1: p. 183). We already know that entanglement means non-factorizability of the state vector describing a system with at least two different degrees of freedom. In this chapter, we shall see that this may be the case also for systems that are very far away (space-like distant) from each other and we shall learn many interesting consequences of this state of affairs. Recent developments show that one may entangle even particles that have never interacted with each other. The starting point of the following analysis is necessarily represented by the pioneering paper of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, who inaugurated an incredible series of theoretical and experimental investigations right up to the present day that have confirmed the predictions of quantum mechanics. The “irony” of this history is that Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, EPR for short, aimed to present a definitive proof of the inconsistency of quantum mechanics relative to classical physical theory. In fact, they initiated one of the most prolific fields of modern science.
Entanglement is one of the most surprising features of quantum mechanics. However, it was not until the last decades of the twentieth century that its full importance was understood and it was realized that it could lead to revolutionary applications in the area of quantum information. It was A. Einstein who discovered the extraordinary properties of non-factorizable two-particle states, when seeking to demonstrate that the formalism of quantum mechanics is incomplete. He presented his findings in 1935 in his famous article published jointly with B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, now referred to as the ‘EPR’ paper. Soon afterwards, Schrödinger coined the term ‘entangled states’ to emphasize the fact that the properties of the two particles are inextricably bound together. In the EPR article, Einstein and his colleagues used quantum predictions to conclude that the formalism of quantum mechanics was incomplete, in the sense that it did not account for the whole of physical reality, and that the task of physics was therefore to find a more complete theory. They did not contest the validity of the quantum formalism, but suggested that a further, more detailed level of description would have to be introduced, in which each particle of the EPR pair would have well-defined properties that were not taken into account in the quantum formalism.
QUANTUM entanglement is one the weirdest features of quantum mechanics and is at the heart of most of the paradoxes in quantum theory. Erwin Schrödinger considered it to be the most profound characteristics of quantum mechanics and Albert Einstein called it spooky. Entanglement is an attribute that links two or more quantum systems as one and allows particles with two distinct quantum states to have a much closer relationship than classical physics permits. For instance it is possible to create pairs of photons that have their polarizations entangled: if the first photon is circularly polarized in a right-handed sense, then the second photon is always polarized in a left-handed sense, and vice versa.
Summary: \nEntanglement is a strange feature contained in the quantum mechanical framework, first observed theoretically by Erwin Schrödinger and Albert Einstein. An inherent attribute of entanglement is non-locality, and in the continuation of this, several non-reductionist features, which are conceptually challenging and philosophically interesting. \n \nA considerable growth of the interest in quantum entanglement has occurred since the early 1990s, and much of the reason for this is that the tools of quantum optics and modern instrumentation have made it possible to measure and manipulate entangled quantum systems. Today, several applications of entanglement exist, including quantum computers and several areas in quantum communications. \n \nA quantum state is either separable or entangled, it cannot be none or both. A separable state do not exhibit the non-local features found in entangled states, and are in this sense comparable to classic states. An important issue here is the separability problem, which is the problem of determining whether a given state is entangled or not. \n \nWe study these quantum states as Hermitian matrices with positive eigenvalues in convex spaces. The PPT criterion is based on the partial transposition operation, which essentially transposes one of the two subsystems in the quantum system. For some states the result is another quantum (positive) state, and these are PPT (Positive Partial Transpose) states, while others that gain negative eigenvalues are called NPT states. \n \nFor systems of dimensions 2 × 2 and 2 × 3, the PPT states are identical to the separable states, and the NPT states are identical to the entangled states, so the PPT criterion is always conclusive. But for larger dimensions, such as for instance the 3 × 3 system, there always exist PPT states that are entangled, so for this case the PPT criterion can only be used in a contrapositive way. Since entangled PPT states in this sense seem to have great significance, their characteristics are worth studying. \nAs mentioned, the PPT criterion uses the transposition map on one of the two subsystems of a composite quantum system. Transposition is an example of a positive map, in that it maps all quantum states into quantum states. It is possible to use positive maps to formulate a much more general criterion for the separability problem.There is a link (an isomorphism) between positive maps and a subset of Hermitian operators called entanglement witnesses. \n \nThe so-called Horodecki criterion states that a quantum state is separable if and only if the expectation value of all entanglement witnesses in the state are non-negative. If the expectation value of one (or possibly several) entanglement witnesses in a given quantum state is negative, then the state is always entangled. This criterion is both necessary and sufficient, but demands that we can characterize the entire set of entanglement witnesses. \n \nThe approach in this thesis is through geometry. Of fundamental importance is the convex nature of the sets in question. The knowledge and understanding of the extremal points in these sets is very relevant, since they describe the sets completely. Undertaking completely analytic studies of the geometry at hand is in general very hard, especially as the dimension of the systems grow. The development and use of numerical tools is therefore essential.
One of the most intriguing concepts of quantum mechanics is quantum entanglement. Two physical systems are said to be entangled with respect to a certain variable, if their individual outcomes of the variable are undetermined before measurement, but strictly correlated. Measurement of the variable for only one system immediately determines the outcome for the other system, irrespective of the distance between the two systems. It is this strong correlation that provides a basis for perspective, powerful applications like quantum cryptography and quantum computation. The most studied entangled systems, often called EPR systems (after the pioneers Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen), are pairs of light particles or photon pairs. These photon pairs, usually generated via the optical process of a spontaneous parametric down-conversion, are, in principal, simultaneously entangled in three variables, being polarization (polarization entanglement), energy or time (time entanglement), and momentum or transverse space (spatial entanglement). The contents of this thesis cover new insights in the polarization and spatial entanglement of photons. We have investigated both the entanglement quality and the yield of entangled photons for different experimental geometries that are associated with the production and detection of the photons.