Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

Formalism

Shabnam Siddiqui

Published Oct 10, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This chapter discusses the mathematical formalism of the theory of quantum mechanics and present the differences between the theory of classical mechanics and quantum mechanics. The mathematics that is used to account for the indeterminacy of quantum mechanics renders the mathematical approach of quantum mechanics distinct from that of classical mechanics. In quantum mechanics, any dynamical variable that is an observable that can be measured experimentally is described as a linear Hermitian operator. In quantum mechanics, it is not only necessary to define an observable, but it is also necessary to define the states associated with it. When a system is in a linear superposition of states of an observable, the number of different values of an observable observed in an experiment is equal to the number of states that a quantum mechanical system can jump into upon measurement of an observable.

DOI
10.1201/b22074-3

Related papers

The mathematical structure of quantum mechanics

Belal Ehsan Baaquie

An examination of the postulates of quantum mechanics reveals a number of fundamental mathematical constructs that form its theoretical underpinnings. Many of the results that are summarized in this Chapter will only become clear after reading the rest of the book and a re-reading may be in order. The dynamical variables of classical mechanics are superseded by the quantum degree of freedom. An exhaustive and complete description of the indeterminate degree of freedom is given by its state function, which is an element of a state space that, in general, is an infinite-dimensional linear vector space. The properties of the indeterminate degree of freedom are extracted from its state vector by the linear action of operators representing experimentally observable quantities. Repeated applications of the operators on the state function yield the average value of the operator for the state [Baaquie (2013e)]. The conceptual framework of quantum mechanics is discussed in Section 2.1. The concepts of degree of freedom, state space and operators are briefly reviewed in Sections 2.3–2.5. Three distinct formulations of quantum mechanics emerge from the superstructure of quantum mechanics and these are briefly summarized in Sections 2.7–2.9. The Copenhagen quantum postulate The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, pioneered by Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg, provides a conceptual framework for the interpretation of the mathematical constructs of quantum mechanics and is the standard interpretation that is followed by the majority of practicing physicists [Stapp (1963), Dirac (1999)].

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 27, 2014•2 citations

Operators in quantum mechanics

Victor M. Galitski, Boris Mikhailovich Karnakov, Vladimir I Kogan +1 more

Abstract Mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics is closely connected with the theory of linear operators. A key quantum-mechanical principle is that physical quantities (observables) are represented by Hermitian linear operators that act on state vectors that belong to a Hilbert vector space. This chapter analyzes problems that deal with the basic concepts of the theory of linear operators; eigenfunctions, eigenvalues, mean values; the projection operators; quantum-mechanical representations of operators and wave-functions; and unitary operators.

•Feb 28, 2013•2 citations

Measurements and mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics

D. A. Slavnov

A scheme for constructing quantum mechanics is given that does not have Hilbert space and linear operators as its basic elements. Instead, a version of algebraic approach is considered. Elements of a noncommutative algebra (observables) and functionals on this algebra (elementary states) associated with results of single measurements are used as primary components of the scheme. On the one hand, it is possible to use within the scheme the formalism of the standard (Kolmogorov) probability theory, and, on the other hand, it is possible to reproduce the mathematical formalism of standard quantum mechanics, and to study the limits of its applicability. A short outline is given of the necessary material from the theory of algebras and probability theory. It is described how the mathematical scheme of the paper agrees with the theory of quantum measurements, and avoids quantum paradoxes.

Physics of Particles and Nuclei•Mar 1, 2007•17 citations

Quantum mechanics

Carlo Rovelli C

Quantum mechanics (QM) is not just a theory of micro-objects: it is our current fundamental theory of motion. It expresses a deeper understanding of Nature than classical mechanics. Precisely as classical mechanics, the conventional formulation of QM describes evolution of states and observables in time. Precisely as classical mechanics, this is not sufficient to deal with general relativistic systems, because these systems do not describe evolution in time; they describe correlations between observables. Therefore, a formulation of QM slightly more general than the conventional one – or a quantum version of the relativistic classical mechanics discussed in the previous chapter – is needed. In this chapter I discuss the possibility of such a formulation. In the last section I discuss the general physical interpretation of QM. QM can be formulated in a number of more or less equivalent formalisms: canonical (Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators), covariant (Feynman's sum-over-histories), algebraic (states as linear functionals over an abstract algebra of observables) and others. Generally, but not always, we are able to translate these formalisms into one another, but often what is easy in one formulation is difficult in another. A generalrelativistic sum-over-histories formalism has been developed by Jim Hartle. Here I focus on the canonical formalism, because the canonical formalism has provided the mathematical completeness and precision needed to explicitly construct the mathematical apparatus of quantum gravity. Later I will consider alternative formalisms.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 15, 2004•0 citations

A Brief Introduction to Quantum Formalism

Emmanuel E. Haven, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

The authors present briefly the basic notions of the quantum formalism: pure and mixed states; quantum observables; quantum probability; Born’s rule, superposition, and ‘state collapse’; the projection postulate (von Neumann–Lüders postulate); Dirac’s ket and bra-vector notations; elements of quantum information theory and quantum logic; Schrödinger’s and von Neumann’s equations; unitary dynamics; and positive operator valued measures. They also define the basic mathematical notions related to the quantum formalism: Hilbert space; scalar product; norm; Hermitian operator (matrix); projector; and unitary operator and adjoint operator. This chapter may be useful for newcomers to the field, but for those readers who have preliminary knowledge about quantum mechanics (QM) they can proceed directly to advanced chapters. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks•Jan 1, 2017•6 citations

Mathematical Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Nicolai Friis

Abstract In this chapter we present the mathematical framework of describing wave functions as vectors in a Hilbert space and observables as Hermitian operators on such a vector space. We describe the mathematical formulation of these ideas for finite and infinite-dimensional cases via the Dirac notation, and discuss the example of the Hilbert space of photon polarization. Important classes of linear operators on Hilbert spaces are discussed, including projectors, Hermitian and self-adjoint operators, as well as unitary operators. As an important centre piece for the mathematical language of quantum mechanics we present the spectral theorem. We discuss the subtleties of this framework in infinite dimensions, giving a brief overview of the distributional aspects of quantum mechanics and the conceptually important problem of finding self-adjoint extensions via the Weyl-von Neumann theorem

•Sep 7, 2023•0 citations
This chapter discusses the mathematical formalism of the theory of quantum mechanics and present the differences between the theory of classical mechanics and quantum mechanics. The mathematics that is used to account for the indeterminacy of quantum mechanics renders the mathematical approach of quantum mechanics distinct from that of classical mechanics. In quantum mechanics, any dynamical variable that is an observable that can be measured experimentally is described as a linear Hermitian operator. In quantum mechanics, it is not only necessary to define an observable, but it is also necessary to define the states associated with it. When a system is in a linear superposition of states of an observable, the number of different values of an observable observed in an experiment is equal to the number of states that a quantum mechanical system can jump into upon measurement of an observable.
An examination of the postulates of quantum mechanics reveals a number of fundamental mathematical constructs that form its theoretical underpinnings. Many of the results that are summarized in this Chapter will only become clear after reading the rest of the book and a re-reading may be in order. The dynamical variables of classical mechanics are superseded by the quantum degree of freedom. An exhaustive and complete description of the indeterminate degree of freedom is given by its state function, which is an element of a state space that, in general, is an infinite-dimensional linear vector space. The properties of the indeterminate degree of freedom are extracted from its state vector by the linear action of operators representing experimentally observable quantities. Repeated applications of the operators on the state function yield the average value of the operator for the state [Baaquie (2013e)]. The conceptual framework of quantum mechanics is discussed in Section 2.1. The concepts of degree of freedom, state space and operators are briefly reviewed in Sections 2.3–2.5. Three distinct formulations of quantum mechanics emerge from the superstructure of quantum mechanics and these are briefly summarized in Sections 2.7–2.9. The Copenhagen quantum postulate The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, pioneered by Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg, provides a conceptual framework for the interpretation of the mathematical constructs of quantum mechanics and is the standard interpretation that is followed by the majority of practicing physicists [Stapp (1963), Dirac (1999)].
Abstract Mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics is closely connected with the theory of linear operators. A key quantum-mechanical principle is that physical quantities (observables) are represented by Hermitian linear operators that act on state vectors that belong to a Hilbert vector space. This chapter analyzes problems that deal with the basic concepts of the theory of linear operators; eigenfunctions, eigenvalues, mean values; the projection operators; quantum-mechanical representations of operators and wave-functions; and unitary operators.
A scheme for constructing quantum mechanics is given that does not have Hilbert space and linear operators as its basic elements. Instead, a version of algebraic approach is considered. Elements of a noncommutative algebra (observables) and functionals on this algebra (elementary states) associated with results of single measurements are used as primary components of the scheme. On the one hand, it is possible to use within the scheme the formalism of the standard (Kolmogorov) probability theory, and, on the other hand, it is possible to reproduce the mathematical formalism of standard quantum mechanics, and to study the limits of its applicability. A short outline is given of the necessary material from the theory of algebras and probability theory. It is described how the mathematical scheme of the paper agrees with the theory of quantum measurements, and avoids quantum paradoxes.
Quantum mechanics (QM) is not just a theory of micro-objects: it is our current fundamental theory of motion. It expresses a deeper understanding of Nature than classical mechanics. Precisely as classical mechanics, the conventional formulation of QM describes evolution of states and observables in time. Precisely as classical mechanics, this is not sufficient to deal with general relativistic systems, because these systems do not describe evolution in time; they describe correlations between observables. Therefore, a formulation of QM slightly more general than the conventional one – or a quantum version of the relativistic classical mechanics discussed in the previous chapter – is needed. In this chapter I discuss the possibility of such a formulation. In the last section I discuss the general physical interpretation of QM. QM can be formulated in a number of more or less equivalent formalisms: canonical (Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators), covariant (Feynman's sum-over-histories), algebraic (states as linear functionals over an abstract algebra of observables) and others. Generally, but not always, we are able to translate these formalisms into one another, but often what is easy in one formulation is difficult in another. A generalrelativistic sum-over-histories formalism has been developed by Jim Hartle. Here I focus on the canonical formalism, because the canonical formalism has provided the mathematical completeness and precision needed to explicitly construct the mathematical apparatus of quantum gravity. Later I will consider alternative formalisms.
The authors present briefly the basic notions of the quantum formalism: pure and mixed states; quantum observables; quantum probability; Born’s rule, superposition, and ‘state collapse’; the projection postulate (von Neumann–Lüders postulate); Dirac’s ket and bra-vector notations; elements of quantum information theory and quantum logic; Schrödinger’s and von Neumann’s equations; unitary dynamics; and positive operator valued measures. They also define the basic mathematical notions related to the quantum formalism: Hilbert space; scalar product; norm; Hermitian operator (matrix); projector; and unitary operator and adjoint operator. This chapter may be useful for newcomers to the field, but for those readers who have preliminary knowledge about quantum mechanics (QM) they can proceed directly to advanced chapters. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Abstract In this chapter we present the mathematical framework of describing wave functions as vectors in a Hilbert space and observables as Hermitian operators on such a vector space. We describe the mathematical formulation of these ideas for finite and infinite-dimensional cases via the Dirac notation, and discuss the example of the Hilbert space of photon polarization. Important classes of linear operators on Hilbert spaces are discussed, including projectors, Hermitian and self-adjoint operators, as well as unitary operators. As an important centre piece for the mathematical language of quantum mechanics we present the spectral theorem. We discuss the subtleties of this framework in infinite dimensions, giving a brief overview of the distributional aspects of quantum mechanics and the conceptually important problem of finding self-adjoint extensions via the Weyl-von Neumann theorem